James Martin's latest

  • Thread starter Thread starter CatholicELATeacher
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I just now noticed there was a previous thread that wasn’t open for long.
My question is: how long, oh Lord?
 
What, exactly, is homoerotic about this image? How is it different from any other attempt to portray Jesus as one of our contemporaries?

I think I have missed your point.
 
I’ve seen some of the other images from the same series. The gay Ascension. The gay Trinity. Etc. They’re easy enough to find. I won’t post them here.
 
No, please don’t look. I don’t want to be responsible. They are the products of a sick, distorted (and third rate) artist. They are utter blasphemy.
 
There’s even a t shirt for sale with the artist’s “genderqueer trinity” on it.
And no, I don’t capitalize a holy word when it’s used for the devil’s agenda. Like the “m” in “black mass.”
 
Last edited:
I’ve never seen so many rebukes before on Martin’s Twitter feed. At least there’s that.
 
This is a duplicate thread. We just had a thread on this like 2 days ago, where a number of us made the point that the one image of Moneychangers posted by Fr Martin is not objectionable and that it was Lifesite who decided to post the artist’s entire catalog, which Fr Martin didn’t post.

Fr Martin named the artist no doubt because he reposted an image (the Moneychangers image) that the artist owns and likely requires to be credited when people repost it.

Here is the previous thread:
https://forums.catholic-questions.o...s-blasphemous-image-of-jesus-as-a-homosexual/

I rather liked the image Fr Martin posted today.

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
 
Last edited:
Mark121359 said:
See other artwork (garbage) here;

Fr. James Martin touts blasphemous image of Jesus as a homosexual | Blogs | LifeSite
Click to expand...
“But far more appalling is the suggestion that Jesus rose again “to enjoy homoerotic moments with God,” a notion to which Fr. Martin lends tacit approval by drawing from the Blanchard series of paintings.”

Lifesite News and it’s devotees need to seriously look inward in self examination since by their own logic they give ‘tacit approval’ to pharisaism and sedevacantism by borrowing from their principles.
 
It’s not a sin to be gay. For whatever reason, God has allowed that to affect people from birth. I used to be repulsed by gay people but through the grace of God, I can now distinguish between the orientation.… and the sin of sodomy and unchastity.
 
Emeraldlady said:
“But far more appalling is the suggestion that Jesus rose again “to enjoy homoerotic moments with God,” a notion to which Fr. Martin lends tacit approval by drawing from the Blanchard series of paintings.”
Click to expand...
Tacit approval no doubt. He is very clever.
 
CatholicELATeacher said:
40.png
Emeraldlady:
“But far more appalling is the suggestion that Jesus rose again “to enjoy homoerotic moments with God,” a notion to which Fr. Martin lends tacit approval by drawing from the Blanchard series of paintings.”
Click to expand...
Tacit approval no doubt. He is very clever.
Click to expand...
As with the tacit approval that Lifesite gives pharisaism and sedevacantism.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top