OK, two old errors :
The “Washington-Ajo” error on St. Jerome: “…[Jerome] asserts that the bishop of Rome is of the same worth as the bishop of any smaller city or province. All the bishops, Jerome claims, are the successors of the apostles. No mention is made of Peter, no mention is made of the unity of the church depending on Rome. Surely Jerome recognized the importance of the Roman See – so did just about everyone else. But they did so for reasons that are other than those claimed by modern Romanism.” (
Answers to Catholic Claims [Crowne Publications, 1990], page 121)
Demolished here by John Chapman over 100 years ago.
The “Universal Bishop-Antichrist” error on Pope Gregory the Great: “Gregory likens anyone who would claim to be ‘universal bishop’ to Lucifer himself who attempted to raise his throne above the throne of God Himself (Isaiah 14). Would the modern claims of the papacy qualify for Gregory’s ridicule? This author believes that they would.” (
ATCC, page 122)
Answered here by Radio Replies, This Rock, etc on Gregory
And there is: “In fact, there is a good possibility that Peter did not go to Rome at all” (page 103), that “Babylon” might not be
Rome (page 104).
To be fair, White hasn’t used these since his Dec 1990 debate with Matatics on the Papacy. Webster still uses the “universal bishop” one (
Roman Catholicism [Moody, 1994] and repeated in his more recent books/talks). There are others in that White book (
ATCC) that he still uses (
Cyprian,
Augustine,
Chalcedon and Canon 28, etc) which are more differences of historical interpretation rather than blatant errors. I call the St. Jerome quote he used, the Pope Gregory and “universal bishop” quote, and the “Peter may not have been in Rome” blatant errors.
Phil P