D
Sometimes there is a good reason for avoiding certain people in some situations, but if someone is really advocating for something so extreme there are betters ways to answer it then an abused cliche.It depends on what “JAWS” is intended to prove. If the person is using it in response to the idea that we have to shun sinners and refuse to engage with anyone who disagrees with us, then “JAWS” is a pretty good rebuttal.
Exactly. At some point you need to kind of develop your own moral compass and intuition and not seek internet affirmation for every situation.The real question in my mind is, why do grown adults need to take a poll of Internet strangers in order to decide whether to go to a wedding or not.
There are many decisions I am able to make just fine in my own life without having to ask a committee. If I somehow got it wrong, then God will take it up with me I guess, but I thought the whole point of being an adult was being able to make and own one’s own decisions.
You know, for some people, these decisions seem like they should be relatively easy to navigate, however, sometimes there’s a tangled web of relationships, friendships, even work relationships that might be damaged in some way if one takes a stand about not going to one’s ex-step-mother’s lesbian wedding, or whatever.The real question in my mind is, why do grown adults need to take a poll of Internet strangers in order to decide whether to go to a wedding or not.
Really? Who, and for what sin?You are rebuking someone right now.
I agree we can not see into anyone’s heart and judge the person for the sin they commit. That is left for God alone, though based on the Church and the Word of God we can know if an action someone does is a sin or not.I’m not Christ and cannot see into anyone’s heart, sometimes not even my own, so I will leave the rebuking alon
We can know if an action is wrong by our standards, and can “call out” the action depending on the severity. That is not the same as it being a sin, or having any idea of the person’s actual culpability if it is.we can know if an action someone does is a sin or not.
Not by our standards, by the Word of God and the Church, which tell us if something is wrong or not.We can know if an action is wrong by our standards,
Well said.Oh I’m not disagreeing with you on that one at all and I also agree that often the ones who are most vocal about the sins of others spend very little time being vocal about their own.
“True charity consists in putting up with all one’s neighbors fault’s; never being surprised by his weakness, and being inspired by the least of his virtues” - St Therese of Liseux
Which are the standards we use, aka “our standards”. Granted it is not entirely 100% correct on a certain level, but it is a useful shorthand. Of course the fact that others do not follow or even sometimes recognize them as standards can cause other issues, especially when we go around rebuking people who really don’t care what we think or believe.Not by our standards, by the Word of God and the Church,
Yes, as other posters have noted, admonishing sinners is everybody’s favorite pastime thoughI would just like to remind posters that admonishing sinners is just 1 of the 14 works of mercy (corporal and spiritual) and that there are 13 other great ones that they could try to practice as well
Here at CAF it is usually gossip since admonishing the sinner is going to the sinner and many here at CAF are guilty of “admonishing” sinners or rather gossiping.as other posters have noted, admonishing sinners is everybody’s favorite pastime