M
meltzerboy2
Guest
Thank you for your answers and patience.
Because neither the Holy Spirit nor the Father became man and died for us. They’re not Jesus. The persons of the Trinity are not interchangeable: they’re distinct.So exactly why is it inappropriate to describe the father or holy spirit as saviour, if both are fully God, and so was Jesus?
They’re relational distinct, yes.2014taylorj:
Because neither the Holy Spirit nor the Father became man and died for us. They’re not Jesus. The persons of the Trinity are not interchangeable: they’re distinct.So exactly why is it inappropriate to describe the father or holy spirit as saviour, if both are fully God, and so was Jesus?
For I am the Lord your God, the Holy One of Israel, your Savior . . . “You are my witnesses,” declares the Lord, and my servant whom I have chosen, so that you may know and believe me and understand that I am he. . . I, am the Lord, and apart from me there is no savior. . . I have revealed and saved and proclaimed— I, and not some foreign god among you. You are my witnesses,” declares the Lord, “that I am God… . . This is what the Lord says— your Redeemer, the Holy One of Israel:“. . . I am the Lord, your Holy One, Israel’s Creator, your King.” Isaiah 43It’s not inappropriate to describe God as our savior.
Philip said, “Lord, show us the Father and that will be enough for us.” Jesus answered: “Don’t you know me, Philip, even after I have been among you such a long time? Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’? Don’t you believe that I am in the Father, and that the Father is in me? The words I say to you I do not speak on my own authority. Rather, it is the Father, living in me, who is doing his work. Believe me when I say that I am in the Father and the Father is in me; or at least believe on the evidence of the works themselves. -John 14:8-11well now i’m really confused who is right. Is it appropriate to describe the father or holy spirit as saviour or not. I thought christ died for our atonement?