P
Pattylt
Guest
And I say, no He’s not. I say He is not God at all. That’s a fact!God is Trinity.
See, that got us nowhere!
And I say, no He’s not. I say He is not God at all. That’s a fact!God is Trinity.
PattyIt . . . .God is Trinity.
I get that.And I say, no He’s not.
I think the Old Testament talks about Jesus so much that it’s impossible to see Him as anything other than the prophesied Messiah and God. For example, in the Psalms, David addresses God, and then he says “Your God” - well, who is God’s God? The Hebrew is very clear (Elohim Elohekha). To me, this is a reference to Jesus (God the Son) and God the Father, but if you don’t believe so I’d be curious to hear what you think of it:And I say, no He’s not. I say He is not God at all. That’s a fact!
I would respectfully disagree with the highlighted section. Since you hold diametric different points of view on this subject, there are three possibilities. You PattyIt are right and @Cathoholic is wrong. Cathoholic is right and you PattyIt are wrong. You are both wrong. What is not possible is that you are both “not wrong”,You are a believer, I am not. Your way is right for you but not for me, and my way is right for me and not for you. I’m not wrong, you’re not wrong…we’re just different.
Cathoholic . . .. . . I find it remarkable that Matthew, Mark and Luke never say that Jesus is God
in any sort of direct way. . . .
FiveLinden . . .FiveLinden. What do you think are the “indirect ways” Matthew, Mark, and Luke affirm Jesus’ Divinity?
Cathoholic again . . . .I think there is a lot of confusion about the use of the team ‘Son of God’.
Bold added for emphasis.FiveLinden. What do you think
are the “indirect ways” Matthew, Mark, and Luke affirm Jesus’ Divinity?
Well are you affirming Matthew, Mark, and Luke are asserting Jesus’ Divinity in their Gospels?Confused…
It’s obvious, however that I think I’m right and he thinks he’s right. All he actually wants to state is that he’s right and I’m wrong. It certainly isn’t a way to dialog but I doubt he wants that anyway. That’s ok. I give him the same permission he gave me.What is not possible is that you are both “not wrong”,
This is false.Before Jesus, no one read the Christian Jesus prophesies as such. No one.
Do you know what a Pesher is? Even in the Jewish Peshers, no one seemed to find a Jesus type messiah. This type of Pesher analysis arrived during and after Jesus but not before then. Paul was quite an expert at this technique, by the way. Brilliant even.St. Paul used these same Scriptures to explain Jesus to Jewish people in many synagogues.
I am not going to be sidetracked.Do you know what a Pesher is?
Then you will never understand any point of view except your own. I suspect you like it that way.I am not going to be sidetracked.
You’re wrong.Then you will never understand any point of view except your own.
I suspect you like it that way.
This implies fairly strongly that he and the Father are different people. It does not state that they are simultaneously the same.Christ said” I am the Way the Truth and the Life ”” No one comes to my father,except through me. “
You need to remind me of what answers you need. As far as I can see I have answered them all!I will develop it more when I can get some more answers from @FiveLinden
Yes I know what Paul said - here I am talking about the Gospel writers, who claim to have information about Jesus before he died. Paul does not. He believed he had an encounter with the risen Jesus.Did you see that Paul also believed in the divinity of Christ? (see Colossians 2:9.)
Here it is again . . .You need to remind me of what answers you need. As far as I can see I have answered them all!
FiveLinden . . .
Cathoholic . . .. . . I find it remarkable that Matthew, Mark and Luke never say that Jesus is God
in any sort of direct way . . . .
FiveLinden. What do you think are the “ indirect ways” Matthew, Mark, and Luke affirm Jesus’ Divinity? . . .
Well are you affirming Matthew, Mark, and Luke are asserting Jesus’ Divinity in their Gospels?
(If not why did you put the “indirect” in your statement??)
Cathoholic:![]()
I think there is a lot of confusion about the use of the team ‘Son of God’. Christians seem to think it means ‘second person of the Trinity’. I don’t see any reason to think that is what the writers of the first three Gospels thought. But later theology, read back into the text, makes it possible for people to convince themselves that the writers believed Jesus was God. And there is similar confusion over the term ‘Messiah’. As Bart Ehrman has pointed out there was absolutely no Jewish expectation that the Messiah would be God. So if Jesus said he was the Messiah, he was telling people he was not God, because his listeners did not expect the Messiah to be God.FiveLinden. What do you think are the “indirect ways” Matthew, Mark, and Luke affirm Jesus’ Divinity?
And Peter also. Also in the Gospel of John 20:18, Saint Thomas replies: “My Lord and My God!” In Acts 7:59, Saint Stephen’s reply is recorded “And they stoned Stephen, invoking and saying: Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.”Vico:![]()
Yes I know what Paul said - here I am talking about the Gospel writers, who claim to have information about Jesus before he died. Paul does not. He believed he had an encounter with the risen Jesus.Did you see that Paul also believed in the divinity of Christ? (see Colossians 2:9.)
Jews were as much confused and there failure to identify the Messiah, was also prophesied to them. What would you say about this prophesy:I think there is a lot of confusion about the use of the team ‘Son of God’. Christians seem to think it means ‘second person of the Trinity’. I don’t see any reason to think that is what the writers of the first three Gospels thought. But later theology, read back into the text, makes it possible for people to convince themselves that the writers believed Jesus was God. And there is similar confusion over the term ‘Messiah’. As Bart Ehrman has pointed out there was absolutely no Jewish expectation that the Messiah would be God. So if Jesus said he was the Messiah, he was telling people he was not God, because his listeners did not expect the Messiah to be God.