Jesus ate only 3 times, never bathed, and never used the bathroom

[PhilNeri]

Trelow:

Going to the potty is a pegan invention, traditions of men if you will.

Excellent point! More proof that Catholics are evil! They all follow this ancient, evil, pagan practice!

Jesus must have been pretty bored between the ages of 12 and 30 since the Bible says nothing whatsoever about what He did then. No eating, drinking, “using the little boy’s room”, or sleeping. Not even talking! It’s kinda hard to communicate without talking…unless they used sign language. But the Bible never mentions that, either. How could He love His parents if he never talked to them?

 

[Barbara_Ann]

PhilNeri:

Excellent point! More proof that Catholics are evil! They all follow this ancient, evil, pagan practice!

Jesus must have been pretty bored between the ages of 12 and 30 since the Bible says nothing whatsoever about what He did then. No eating, drinking, “using the little boy’s room”, or sleeping. Not even talking! It’s kinda hard to communicate without talking…unless they used sign language. But the Bible never mentions that, either. How could He love His parents if he never talked to them?

Of course we know what happened after Jesus got lost in the temple. Joseph and Mary were so mad, Jesus was grounded for 18 years. I tried that with my kids but it never seemed to work. You know “You’re grounded for life”

 

[Malachi4U]

Like the Protestants say, if it’s not in the Bible it didn’t happen! Everything else is just a Catholic invention!

 

[DaleMeyn]

Edwin1961:

There is a FOURTH time that Jesus ate:
After Jesus’s resurrection, the Apostles were back at it doing the fishin’ bit, and when Peter realized that it was Jesus on the shore, Peter jumped out of the boat to go to Him. Jesus was cooking a fish breakfast and some of the Apostles didn’t believe it was Jesus so, Jesus ate some fish in front of them to prove Jesus was human AND Divine in the glorified body.
Edwin

There’s more: Luke 13:41-43 “And while they still disbelieved for joy, and wondered, he said to them ‘Have you anything here to eat?’ The gave him a piece of broiled fish, and he took it and ate before them.”
Also, the feast Levi/Matthew threw for him, the dinner at the house of Simon the Pharisee, Simon/Peter’s mother-in-law serving him and disciples, and so forth. Actually, throughout the Gospels, he is portrayed as eating by implication of circumstances. But the basic argument that not everything we must believe is in the Gospels or even other scripture holds, simply by the fact of the late arrival of the New Testament writings on the scene, during which time the faithful knew what to believe nonetheless. Sacred Tradition rules, Sacred Scripture depends on it. Dale.