W
wisdomseeker
Guest
what is your problem. do you have some dislexia or something like that? put on your listen ears.![]()
What did i miss?
what is your problem. do you have some dislexia or something like that? put on your listen ears.![]()
What did i miss?
i do have problems. Thanks for clearing this up for me…Originally Posted by justasking4
What did i miss?
wisdomseeker
what is your problem. do you have some dislexia or something like that? put on your listen ears.
no problem. i am always glad to help.i do have problems. Thanks for clearing this up for me…![]()
wisdomseeker;3264986]
Originally Posted by justasking4
i do have problems. Thanks for clearing this up for me…
My problem is how your church is using the Scriptures to support its beliefs.wisdomseeker
no problem. i am always glad to help.
my question is what are you trying to prove with your assertions? do you have that much hatreth for the mother of God? what wrong has she done to you? if you have a problem with her, take up with God who brought her forth as a virgin.
May the Lord open your eyes so you can see the truth.

why not? give a reason not to believe.My problem is how your church is using the Scriptures to support its beliefs.
Do you believe she was a virgin throughout her life?
![]()
God used different men.celticcrusader;3265143]Yes I believe Mary was ever virgin because my Church HAS the full deposit of the faith! I will keep on believing this untill the Holy Father renders a different infallible decision. JA4 who do you think wrote the bible?
Yes. However its not always easy to determine what the authors meant on some things.and wouldn’t the writers have the best grip of what was ment. not what we think 1600yrs or 2000yrs later?
yes, very true. again that is why we rely on the True Church to guide us. AmenGod used different men.
Yes. However its not always easy to determine what the authors meant on some things.
When you look at the refences to references to His brothers etc throughout the scriptures it is clear these are His brothers through Joseph and Mary. Matthew 13:55-56 is a case in point.wisdomseeker;3265164]
Originally Posted by justasking4
My problem is how your church is using the Scriptures to support its beliefs.
Do you believe she was a virgin throughout her life?
wisdomseeker
why not? give a reason not to believe.
if that it is true. how do you explain why we are still arguing about this today?When you look at the refences to references to His brothers etc throughout the scriptures it is clear these are His brothers through Joseph and Mary. Matthew 13:55-56 is a case in point.
Even Galatians 1:19 is another support that Mary did have other children via her relationship with her husband.
I don’t know if they are discussing it in the catholic church. Protestants don’t accept the catholic position on bibilcal grounds.if that it is true. how do you explain why we are still arguing about this today?
you should know the CC position on this. it is the same yesterday and today. it will not change.I don’t know if they are discussing it in the catholic church. Protestants don’t accept the catholic position on bibilcal grounds.
Not so. The catholic church of today believes things that were not believed in 4th century for example. The catholic church of today has some beliefs that were not believed in the NT church.you should know the CC position on this. it is the same yesterday and today. it will not change.
Not so. The catholic church of today believes things that were not believed in 4th century for example. The catholic church of today has some beliefs that were not believed in the NT church.
Take the marian doctrines. The church of the NT did not believe these doctrines. Nor did the church for centuries.wisdomseeker;
what do you mean? be specific please.
Perhaps this is hard for you to understand. since your mind has been doctrined against Mary the mother of God.Take the marian doctrines. The church of the NT did not believe these doctrines. Nor did the church for centuries.
I sometimes wonder if you joined this Forum just to exasperate Catholics. If Zechariah was right, according to Sacred Tradition, about the soldier’s lance piercing the side of Christ after He died on the Cross, and about Jesus being a “firstborn” child, then obviously the prophet was also right about Jesus being “an only son” of Mary. What else could the prophet mean about Jesus being “an only son” other than he was Mary’s only child? As long as you hate Catholicism, your prejudice will keep you blind from the truth.How do you know this? There is nothing in the passage to indicate this.
Where are you getting from Zechariah that Jesus would be Mary’s only child? Can you give me the verse that says that kind of thing?
The problem is that there is no support for your assertion–
“as the Son of Man, he was born of the Virgin Mary and was her only child”.
please do not take offense on this. but i think protestants are very confused because of false teachings does bring confusion. think for centuries all they do is trying to prove Catholics wrong. they have never succeed. the tracks, the lies about the Church, these are all prosecution against the CC. yet this Church has never defend herself. still here and very strong. this is the work of Christ and not of man. yes the CC is made of fallible men and sinners but also many saints are in this church.Take the marian doctrines. The church of the NT did not believe these doctrines. Nor did the church for centuries.
I could, but I have learned that this is a waste of time in your case. I now know that you will reject whatever I offer, since you have already determined for yourself that the Sacred Traditions are the “speculations of men”.Can you give me the documentation in the Sacred Tradition writings for your assertions?
Since you have rejected what the scriptures say about it, and the Apostolic Tradition, it will be impossible for you to recognize any support. There are none so blind as those who do not wish to see. I tried to get you just to role play, to pretend, just so you could see where we get that, and you could not.The Scriptures never assert she was an ever virgin. There is no Apostolic support for this.
Sure, but they are not necessarily part of the magesterium, so they can say whatever they want, and it will not affect the teaching of the Church.They are relevant because they study these things at depth. Do you know what some of them say?
Well, I appreciate that you are owning it, instead of giving it to someone else. I am still puzzled, though, why it is a problem for you. Why is it so hard for you to accept that other people of sincere faith see things differently than you do? HOw is it that you are somehow prevented from going your way in peace? What drives you to find fault with your brothers and sisters?My problem is how your church is using the Scriptures to support its beliefs.
I need all of your help (Catholic and non). There has been this one show that comes on In Hawaii and it is of a local church. For the last three times that i’ve seen it, the pastor has been saying that Jesus had half brothers. The pastor says that Mary and Joseph had other children.