R
rien
Guest
I was talking with a foirmer Catholic seminarian - he attended an orthodox seminary a few years back - before converting to pentacostalism. He told me that at the very least Jesus had half-brothers. He said Mary may not have been perpetually a virgin.
He referred me to Eusebius’s The History of The Church.
In Book 2 of the Penguin copy of Eusebius says - he pointed me here:
“The there was James who was known as the Brother of the Lord; for he too, was called Joseph’s son, and Joseph Christ’s father, though in fact the Virgin was his betrothed and before they came together she was found to be with child by the Holy Ghost”.
At the very least this sure sounds like James was a half-brother to Jesus through Joseph. The sentence leaves open the possiblity that James was conceived after Jesus which would contradict the perpetual virginity dogma. No where in Eusebius is there a hint of this dogma.
It seems at the very least Jesus had half siblings through a previous to Mary marriage of Joseph.
Is it de-fide that Jesus had no siblings, or has the church not formally stated this?
He referred me to Eusebius’s The History of The Church.
In Book 2 of the Penguin copy of Eusebius says - he pointed me here:
“The there was James who was known as the Brother of the Lord; for he too, was called Joseph’s son, and Joseph Christ’s father, though in fact the Virgin was his betrothed and before they came together she was found to be with child by the Holy Ghost”.
At the very least this sure sounds like James was a half-brother to Jesus through Joseph. The sentence leaves open the possiblity that James was conceived after Jesus which would contradict the perpetual virginity dogma. No where in Eusebius is there a hint of this dogma.
It seems at the very least Jesus had half siblings through a previous to Mary marriage of Joseph.
Is it de-fide that Jesus had no siblings, or has the church not formally stated this?