F
FCEGM
Guest
You just keep making me more and more mushy, don’t you?
Sorry if I have been quite cold in the past but I will try to be more thoughtful from now on.![]()
You just keep making me more and more mushy, don’t you?
Sorry if I have been quite cold in the past but I will try to be more thoughtful from now on.![]()
Amen!It’s that thoughtful heart which will understand Mary.
![]()
Unfortunately, that’s the case when the truth meets error.Zundrah: Well, that’s really cool; that your side can prove that Mary was a perpetual virgin I meanIn some ways, that statement is divisive, sort of like us versus them!
It’s not that “someone long ago believed”, but rather the whole Church believed from the beginning with its knowledge of her and still holds fast to this belief. It wasn’t disbelieved among Christians until Luther helped spawn the unbelievers, although he himself believed in Mary’s Perpetual Virginity.So someone long ago believed that Mary remained a virgin, and so today, the catholics can believe in it too!
Some facts for you:We are talking theories and possibilities, not cold, hard facts!
As the truth often does. “Theories and possibilities” abound regarding the Resurrection of the Lord - many believing, many denying. The deniers don’t falsify the truth about the Resurrection anymore than the deniers falsify the truth about the Holy Virgin.I know that all things are possible with God, so I can’t totally reject the idea that Joseph never had relations with her, or that as a result of this union, she did not bear additional children! And I’m certain that Mr. Stanley is a competent, well-schooled individual; however, he like countless others, has fostered an opinion, or viewpoint, which I’m sure has met with much opposition
Is there a reason why they didn’t have kids or is it because Joseph died early after Christ’s birth?Unfortunately, that’s the case when the truth meets error.
It’s not that “someone long ago believed”, but rather the whole Church believed from the beginning with its knowledge of her and still holds fast to this belief. It wasn’t disbelieved among Christians until Luther helped spawn the unbelievers, although he himself believed in Mary’s Perpetual Virginity.
Some facts for you:
cin.org/users/james/files/talmud.htm
As the truth often does. “Theories and possibilities” abound regarding the Resurrection of the Lord - many believing, many denying. The deniers don’t falsify the truth about the Resurrection anymore than the deniers falsify the truth about the Holy Virgin.
Divisive is showing disrespect for the Mother of Jesus.Zundrah: Well, that’s really cool; that your side can prove that Mary was a perpetual virgin I meanIn some ways, that statement is divisive, sort of like us versus them! So someone long ago believed that Mary remained a virgin, and so today, the catholics can believe in it too! We are talking theories and possibilities, not cold, hard facts! I know that all things are possible with God, so I can’t totally reject the idea that Joseph never had relations with her, or that as a result of this union, she did not bear additional children! And I’m certain that Mr. Stanley is a competent, well-schooled individual; however, he like countless others, has fostered an opinion, or viewpoint, which I’m sure has met with much opposition
![]()
Prieldedi,Divisive is showing disrespect for the Mother of Jesus.
God bless you
Jennifer, the articles I gave you - as do many of the posts on this thread - explain it well. Have you followed the links I gave you?Is there a reason why they didn’t have kids or is it because Joseph died early after Christ’s birth?
Sorry, I have been distracted but I’ll go on them now and pm you or post here when I have checked a few of them.Jennifer, the articles I gave you - as do many of the posts on this thread - explain it well. Have you followed the links I gave you?
“Mary Most Holy is thus the “ever virgin.” Her prerogative is the consequence of her divine motherhood which totally consecrated her to Christ’s mission of redemption.” (From a catechesis of Pope John Paul II on the Blessed Virgin Mary given August 28, 1996.)
This is a doctrine to which all Catholics must give the assent of faith.Just as with your earlier difficulties with the Eucharist, Mary’s Perpetual Virginity is a doctrine to be prayed about - may the results be the same as previous.
The Annunciation and the Nativity from the Joyous Mysteries, should be helpful, Jennifer.Okay then, I will think deeply about this tonight just as I did with the Eucharist.
P.S. What mystery on the rosary should I select for this subject?
Posted by you FCEGM;
I do very much appreciate your approach to this issue, 1b.. . . I love Jesus more than my wife, my family, more than life itself, and cannot elevate Mary, or anyone else to a position even remotely close to Christ! So, with complete respect for your sensibilities, when it comes to Mary, and her supposed virginity, allow me to offer the POSSIBILTY that she may not have been for the rest of her life(after Jesus). Our God is unbelievable, and can do anything He chooses! Mary was an awesome servant, whom I believe God chose, blessed and used for our benefit! God bless all of you!![]()

Yes, we do. They didn’t.And we really don’t know . . if he and Mary had sexual relations, or other children, for that matter
I didn’t say 1beleevr has been disrespectful to Mary.Prieldedi,
This is difficult to say but… can you understand what I mean when I tell you that stating to a person that because he doesn’t believe that Mary was a virgin makes him disrespectful just doesn’t make sense? They are in the belief that she had kids, that’s not disrespectful! That’s just ignorance!
Not when God has taught that, in fact, something is not a possibility, as He does through His Church re Mary and Joseph. Do you entertain the possibility that Jesus didn’t rise from the dead? Free will is given to us that we may believe what God presents to us for our assent of faith, not so that we may embrace error by believing that which we might prefer.That’s the beauty of free will; you can believe that God, in His infinite wisdom, can do anything! Was there someone there, in Biblical times, who knows for a fact, that this marriage was not consummated? The wordPOSSIBILITY exists all through life![]()
What are Christ promises that you say at the bottom of your thoughts, Christ is for Israel he has no promises for you.My My… He did offer it to one group read the scriptures That people Is Israel, You may try and steel what is not yours but the truth remains. The bible and Christ is not for the Gentiles it is and has always been for Israel, even in the Old Testiment, Moses gathered His people Israel. Christ proclaimed I am not sent BUT to the LOST sheep of the house of Israel. Your churches have no claim on The Anointed ONE or the bible that you hold so dearly to your heart. You can’t claim him. and you can’t steal our scriptures and add your twist to it. He didn’t die for you he died for the children of Abraham, The only way you can embrace him is to be adopted. And give up your belief dogma,prieldedi: It is unfortunate, and sad that, for whatever reasons, there is divisiveness, even in the realm of believers! That is why there are so many religions worldwideAnd maybe even subconsciously, churches DO put up barriers, and say, in essence,"If you want to be a part of our church; you ust do this, this, oh, and this too, at least once weekly! When will it end? When humility becomes the rule, rather than the exception! I can only imagine what shape this world would be in, if Jesus had offered salvation to only ONE group of people
Thank goodness He offered it to ALL(John 3:16)