Joe Arpaio: Barack Obama birth proof 'may be forged'

  • Thread starter Thread starter LemonAndLime
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
seekerz said:
Really? Name me one president who has handed over his personal documents (school, passport, adoption) to be vetted and verified in a court of law. If you can’t, at least tell me how many presidents were asked to make those public and whether they did.

Your signature contains some good advice that could bear some following. 15 pages of raising questions just for the sake of raising questions?

I have one question: what evidence would it take to satisfy your curiosity and how can you guarantee that the criteria won’t change once that evidence is presented (like it did after the long form BC was published)?
Click to expand...
I didn’t start the thread. i am participating in the thread and expressing my opinion.
it is up to you whether you want to believe or not believe the findings of the arpaio investigation. the people who don’t believe there is anything to the findings of the arpaio investigation have the choice of not participating in the thread.
as far as my signature goes, i see evil, where you don’t.
 
7_Sorrows said:
actually, other presidents have been quite open with their past. i am sure if the shoe were on the other foot and these questions were being asked of a conservative in office, the media would be all over it. but since it is one of their pet democrats, the issue will be ignored and those who want the truth will be made out to be conspiracy theorists. they definitely made a big deal about john mccain’s place of birth.
Click to expand...
I don’t remember much being said about his not being born in the US and actually being a prisoner of war ( therefore, the more likely Manchurian candidate) , but I do remember he was almost dead last in his class at Annapolis. Is that what you mean?
 
Is there any hard substance to the Arpaio allegation? There are statements, counterpoints, etc., but I have read little that is holding strictly to provable facts. I don’t mean allegations. I want to see exactly what is being claimed, the authorities whose opinions are used, their level of expertise, whatever, and it should be free of political bias. I know, I know, good luck with that, but I would like to see bare facts.
 
If I were in their neighboring state, I would confidently bet this investigation will go nowhere.
Reply With Quotehttp://www.datamar.info/avatar4.jpg
 
ellipsis2 said:
I don’t remember much being said about his not being born in the US and actually being a prisoner of war ( therefore, the more likely Manchurian candidate) , but I do remember he was almost dead last in his class at Annapolis. Is that what you mean?
Click to expand...
Which hard facts do you want to see? The actual piece of paper?
 
Judith48 said:
If I were in their neighboring state, I would confidently bet this investigation will go nowhere.
Reply With Quotehttp://www.datamar.info/avatar4.jpg
Click to expand...
Regardless where one lives, it’s a sure bet that this “investigation” will go nowhere. Conspiracy fiction is not fact.
 
I knew it, I knew it - always knew the guy was never born! Skrulls aren’t born, they self-manifest from the green goop kids leave behind after mixing Play-Doh colors. 😛
 
ManOnFire said:
The national news is too prejudicial and bigoted to be fair.
Click to expand...
Prejudiced and bigoted? Because they won’t report on a non-story by people who have made a judgment that the president wasn’t qualified to become president and *then *obsessed themselves with finding ‘proof’ of that? Your comment was meant to be satire right?
 
seekerz said:
Prejudiced and bigoted? Because they won’t report on a non-story by people who have made a judgment that the president wasn’t qualified to become president and *then *obsessed themselves with finding ‘proof’ of that? Your comment was meant to be satire right?
Click to expand...
If you would have watched the video, they set out to prove it was authentic. They could not, and that is the story.
 
buffalo said:
If you would have watched the video, they set out to prove it was authentic. They could not, and that is the story.
Click to expand...
Why did they feel the need to prove it was authentic? Have they vetted the documents of previous presidents?
 
seekerz said:
Why did they feel the need to prove it was authentic? Have they vetted the documents of previous presidents?
Click to expand...
The only reason this came up was the information that his own relatives made public.

The truth should be our interest here. If fabricated, why?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top