Joe Biden formally endorsed by Planned Parenthood

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dr_Meinheimer
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Planned Parenthood is by far the largest abortion provider in the United States.


Planned Parenthood provides 40% of the nation’s abortions.
To get away with the claim that abortion accounts for just four percent of its services, Planned Parenthood divides its total number of abortions by the number of services it provides. These services include packets of birth control, pregnancy tests, urine testing, STI testing, and more, which are likely provided for each woman who comes for an abortion. A pregnancy test may cost around $10 but an abortion costs between $300 and $1500. The two “services” are in no way equal when it comes to what its purpose is and how much money they are bringing in.
 
Yes it is. Not the company I’d want to share my vote with. They are not some fringe group with a few members.
 
Joe Biden has a long history advancing abortion. That’s why Planned Parenthood loves him.
Joe Biden’s voting record:
Voted NO on defining unborn child as eligible for SCHIP. (Mar 2008)
Voted NO on prohibiting minors crossing state lines for abortion. (Mar 2008)
Voted NO on notifying parents of minors who get out-of-state abortions. (Jul 2006)
Voted NO on criminal penalty for harming unborn fetus during other crime. (Mar 2004)
Voted NO on maintaining ban on Military Base Abortions. (Jun 2000)
Voted NO on banning human cloning. (Feb 1998)
On the other hand, President Trump’s actions are possibly the most pro-life of any President in American history.
 
“Planned Parenthood endorsed Joe Biden”

DUH!!! Actually, all they needed to make the decision was D!
 
Well - not exactly true… there are a few - pro-Life Democrats - very few … that are not endorsed by planned parenthood and NARAL …

However, once those pro-Life Democrats decide they want re-elected and or a career in politics and move up to state or national positions within the Democratic Party - they readily abandon their pro-life positions … which is why I personally dont even consider the pro-Life Democrats any more. I tried to support them but have been burned time after time . as soon as you support them - they change position …

Also, the Democrats for Life … the DNC does not listen to them, their numbers are few and getting fewer - all the time I supported them the Democratic Platform abandoned any pretext on abortion … the party moved from abortions being “limited in number, safe and rare” to celebrating “abortion on demand, taxpayer funded and right up to the moment of birth”

And Joe Biden has been very vocal in his ever increasing support for tax payer funded abortion on demand - which is vastly more than just having a “D” behind his name. Coupled with his appeal to be a faithful “Catholic” - he not only directly supports the abortion industry, he actively promotes it and causes public scandal to our Catholic faith at the same time …
 
Breaking News!

ProLife Democrats are holding their convention at my house. Social distancing will be strictly observed, and one of my bathrooms should accomodate them all.
 
Horton said:
40.png
LeafByNiggle:
Biden has not caused a single abortion
Click to expand...
Is that how liberals justify voting for Biden and other pro-abortion candidates?
Click to expand...
The dangers of another 4 years of Trump is the main justification.
 
Let’s not pretend that if McCain was the nominee, you’d be voting for him either.
 
It was his condemnation of the ACA and last minute vote not to repeal it that sealed the deal, huh? 🙂
 

The abortion business is criticizing an Iowa bill that ensures abortion facilities give women the opportunity to see their unborn babies on an ultrasound and hear their baby’s heartbeat at least 24 hours prior to the abortion. In addition, Iowa requires abortion facilities to provide women with information about abortion risks and resources available for parenting and adoption, and to confirm in writing that women received it.

Planned Parenthood of the Heartland announced Tuesday that it had filed suit to block the July 1 implementation of the bill.

Informed consent laws help protect unborn babies from abortion, and the abortion industry knows it. This is pro-woman?
 
Last edited:
For me - no. I am voting for Biden, simply because he is a better choice than Trump.
 
Trump’s not perfect, he hasn’t sent guns to Mexico that killed innocents like Obama, ISIS did not rise to power under Trump as it did under Obama, Iran did not get awarded for their nuclear program under Trump as they did under Obama, Honduras did not let go of an avalanche of refugees under Trump as it did under Obama. What a disaster that was.

And as for Planned Parenthood, reprehensible.

I will vote for President Trump, thank goodness for the moral values he has brought to office, not the despicable abortions in the USA that puts us on par with North Korea and China.
1cthlctrth said:
Joe Biden has a long history advancing abortion. That’s why Planned Parenthood loves him.
Joe Biden’s voting record:
Voted NO on defining unborn child as eligible for SCHIP. (Mar 2008)
Voted NO on prohibiting minors crossing state lines for abortion. (Mar 2008)
Voted NO on notifying parents of minors who get out-of-state abortions. (Jul 2006)
Voted NO on criminal penalty for harming unborn fetus during other crime. (Mar 2004)
Voted NO on maintaining ban on Military Base Abortions. (Jun 2000)
Voted NO on banning human cloning. (Feb 1998)
On the other hand, President Trump’s actions are possibly the most pro-life of any President in American history.
Click to expand...
With all of this talk on white supremacy, one has to read Margaret Sanger’s writings and think of that. Yet, she started Planned Parenthood. PP gives out those Sanger awards. Time for this to be seen for what it is.
 
Last edited:
I remember the same logic fallacy being used in 2016 when David Duke endorsed Trump. Biden’s record on abortion is a good reason to not vote for him. Who endorses who is not.
 
True but I’d say one can probably differentiate between a fringe individual and a multi-billion dollar child-killing industry leader. Especially when one of the men claims to be Catholic.

I don’t generally hold endorsements against a candidate, since they have little control over that, but that gets a bit different when we are talking major lobbies.
 
Dr_Meinheimer said:
True but I’d say one can probably differentiate between a fringe individual and a multi-billion dollar child-killing industry leader.
Click to expand...
That differentiation has no effect on the fallacy of denigrating someone based on who endorses him. An endorsement from an evil entity is an endorsement from an evil entity, whether that entity is a fringe individual (with a large following) or an organization that promotes an evil morality.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top