John 3:13

  • Thread starter Thread starter cheeto1
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi intheBible,

Wow, you’ve done a lot of thinking about this theory. Yet, I don’t understand how
that God knows the future, means Jesus died before His crucifixion. Just how was
it that He was killed? Are you really saying He was killed before the foundation of the
world, or do you agree with NHinsider?

Also, why do you think Jesus said “no one has gone up to heaven but the Son of Man” if Enoch and Elijah went up to heaven?
Because nobody has “gone up” except the Son of Man, that is Christ. Enoch and Elijah were “taken up” gathered up, translated, they were, then they were not. They did not go of their own volition, they went because Christ “took them”. However they were taken only because they were saved men, they were only saved because their sins had been paid for. their sins were paid for because Christ is the Lamb who was slain before the foundation of the earth.

God is from everlasting to everlasting He knows the end from the beginning, He has a salvation plan for sure. However all of this work has already been paid for by Christ as the Lamb slain “before” the foundations. So Christ came to earth for our benefit, to demonstrate His love. Also it was necessary to “complete” the salvation plan. the new testament gospels and apostles are important witnesses and teach us spiritual information for our salvation.
 
The path was that I was taught that Christ died on the Cross and that by believing this fact and on Christ, I was saved.

However, I just learned that the bible does not say that, It just doesn’t, not when you look at all the information.And so I am being asked to deny the death and resurrection of Christ, of the Lamb, as if this is any less important than the humanly earthly story of Christ demonstrating how He had already died. I can’t simply not dismiss this, It seems rather important, and also incredibly different from what I always new, but to deny it would be to deny Christ right? I mean it happened, there it is, so my pasture doesn’t understand it, does that mean anything to me?

Christ did not “die” on the Cross, He died before the foundations of the earth, and so the only possible explanation for the Passion, was that it was a demonstration of how He paid for our sins, the Love He has for us. So this is a wrong teaching right? If I believe what I have been taught, then I have to discount the word of God, that would mean I have more trust in my church interpretation than in the word of God. This is not the point of the thread, do not derail please, but clearly these verses say something contrary to what my church said. I had to decide to put my faith in the word of God, that is the bible, because I seemed to read that Christ is the Lamb slain before the foundations and that He died for those He had already chosen and written about in the Book of Life of the Lamb, and they did not.
Any time you think you (or some teacher you’ve just learned from) have discovered something in Scripture that is different from what has been taught since the Apostles, you should ask a couple of questions-
  1. Why has something been revealed to me (or my teacher) that has not been revealed to anyone else since Pentecost?
  2. If what I have discovered/learned is true, does that mean that for the last 1970x years everyone who believed what the Apostles taught has been wrong? And if that is true, does that mean that Jesus was wrong when He said He would send the Holy Spirit to reveal to the Apostles everything that they needed to know? Or does it mean that the Apostles weren’t paying attention to the Spirit, and therefore God allowed almost 2000 years of people to go to hell because they believed what the Apostles taught?
2 Peter warns that Scripture is NOT subject to personal interpretation, and cautions us against the risk of “distorting” the Scriptures. Jesus gave His Apostles the authority given to Him by God. We need to be in the Word, we need to be diligent, but if we find ourselves being led into something that is contrary to the very Tradition that gave us the Scripture, we need to acknowledge that we MAY be being led astray, and be humble enough to be instructed by those to whom that responsibility has been given.
 
I think the thread is revolving around the idea of predestination, and that is a bit of a mistake – there are several connections which may be understood in a different manner that is consistent scripturally – and as far as I know, the CCC as well.

Notice, only one can go to heaven – him whom came down.
Yet no one here has thought about the analogy – the church is the body of christ.
This is NOT a mere analogy, but a truth equivalent to the marriage statement that “the two become one flesh”

It is only because God sees his son in us, that we are him and with him in heaven – not as a replacement, but a bride and daughter in law, and adopted children.

It says of Enoch he walked with God Gen 5:21-- it doesn’t say he was “assumed”, but the following statement is even more important – 5:24 says “He was not” because God took him. I would say, a man takes a wife; and the two are one flesh.

In the OT we see a vision of Jacob of the Angels ascending and Descending on a stairway (ladder). In the NT Jesus identifies himself with this stairway, saying you will see the angels ascending and descending on the son of Man.

In this thread predestination becomes a serious stumbling block because assumptions are being made about the meaning of words.
I would point your attention to Matth 13:35 – and note that this is fulfillment of scripture; any search of the exact Greek terms will show up psalm 77 verse 2.
The first and foremost thing I wish to point out is that the psalm strictly rules out the creation of the earth as “foundation of the world”. There are places where Foundation of the Earth appear when the earlier is meant.

The Foundation we hear so often in the NT, is the Foundation of a house, of a home, with children and people. The word “world” in these NT passages is Cosmos – the root word of cosmopolitan; a city with foundations. And the house that is repeatedly referenced in these passages directly and indirectly is the TEMPLE and tent of meeting the Israelites had in the desert when they were sanctified by God. There can be many foundations of the world, for there are many cities which rise and fall – and the temple itself was rebuilt after each sin.

I am too tired to complete the thoughts, but I think the thread is wandering because no one understands the meaning of foundation of the cosmos (world).
A cosmos is a house with furnishings – just as the temple is; or any proper family dwelling. Perhaps the more thoughtful among you will begin to see connections which perhaps were not obvious before – and can begin to grasp that their are other ways to understand these passages which make more sense than the sole idea of “TIME” – so until later; peace.
 
What theological point, besides Jesus did not physically die on the Cross, are you trying to make, intheBible? The soul is immortal, it cannot die. Elijah and Enoch did not go to heaven.

It would be a worthwhile study to determine what the Scriptures mean by spiritual death. I recommend reading and studying what has been taught throughout the ages, though, instead of drawing your own conclusions.

In one of his letters, St. Paul calls those who deny the Crucifixion and its salvific work the “liars” and the “false prophets”. I am unsure as to whether you have done that or not, but, it seems you have come dangerously close. Perhaps you should rethink your theory in light of this. I do not have time, this morning, to research the verse. Maybe someone can help in this regard.
 
when we compare scripture to scripture, the bible speaks for itself, and so your explanation does not fit, and is not in harmony with the rest of the bible. Yet that is quite all right, we are commanded to continue in our reading of the bible for the increase of knowledge, for reproof and correction.

I need exact bible verses in order to show you how they all fit together. Thus far I have provided scripture, and clearly it speaks of “before the foundations” we know this is before creation because Gen 1:1 says in the beginning God created the heaven and earth[The Foundations]. So the Lamb slain “before” the foundation is a reference to before creation. Also, the bible speaks of the Lamb slain and so this must not simply be ignored. What I did was gather all the information, and draw a valid accurate conclusion from it. My teaching is in harmony.

Now it seems people don’t understand, or they ‘only’ understand the cross aspect of salvation, which is only a piece of the puzzle. Everybody that has tried counter this argument has only produced faulty wisdom from there own brain based on what they already know. And how will that fit into and explain something that is new and unknown. You are doing what so many before have done, and we all scoff at their stupidity, and that is trying to make excuses for and explain away something they have no understanding of because they ‘seem’ to have all the answers. And we look at these people and ‘we all’ say to ourselves, “why can’t you just be honest. Just say you didn’t know, whats the big deal” And so that is what is happening right now, I just presented scripture and you instantly have an explanation better than the teachers. That is very prideful, is it not? That will not be adequate to counter this argument.

So far, the verses speak for themselves. Can you produce a valid counter argument that does not simply ignore the verses I provided. If you cant include the verses i provided into your explanation then you do not have harmony, and you do not have the full gospel. Forgive me, I know this is a bold statement, yet consider the truth of it. If you discount a verse here or there because it does not fit into your idea of what you know as truth, then you do not have complete harmony do you, and you do not have complete understanding. That is a logical assessment.

So i only ask for you to explain a little better, including “these verses” as well.

Predestination is ‘clearly’ spoken about in the bible. It is a fact! and it is true! and it needs to be taken into consideration when trying to interpret scripture. If you can’t fit this information into your previous understanding of the bible then you do not have harmony, and must re-validate what you had always believed. I say this out of Love, because I was in that trap, and I found truth and it is God’s commission to go out and preach into all the world.

I am hearing that because the church has no hard and fast teaching on the Lamb slain, or predestination, then any teaching outside the church must be considered as heresy. Yet consider the word heresy, am I denying Christ, am I preaching a different book other than the one written by God? No, I am not, so then it must be false right. Well that argument is a false argument and implies that instead of “listening” to the word of God, I should listen to the church, well consider the fact that the church has no teaching on the subjects. Well who has more authority, the word of God, or the church. If you believe in the word of God, as being from the word of God, then that is your ultimate authority and so I took verses from the word of God and applied them and they are in harmony and can be understood. What I did not do, is make up something like purgatory to explain certain aspects of the bible into a false harmony. There is a difference, one is from the bible, and the other is from a different book. Again, who is the ultimate authority, the word of God, or the word of Man because no where in the bible is purgatory even mentioned, and unless you ‘do not’ understand what a parable is, you would create something ‘made up’ and ‘false’ like purgatory.

What I just presented, does not in any way imply a lesser degree of importance on the Passion, however it does imply that Christ has already been under the wrath of God, which is spiritual death, before God created the heaven and earth; that all the work was done before God created the heaven and earth and so this is why Enoch, who was only the ‘7th’ from Adam could have been “TAKEN” by God. Because Enoch’s sin had “ALREADY” been paid for. This is why the story is there, even so early as to be placed in Genesis. You do not need purgatory to explain this, you do not need to work out a way around “all men are born of original sin”. It all connects. The Lamb was killed, all those whose names are written in the Book of Life of the Lamb slain before the foundations, there sins have been paid for; so Enoch heard the word of God, became saved, because faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of God, and was a righteous man whom walked with God and “who was, and was not”. No unnecessary words or explanations, it is what it is; we can not try explain God, we can only learn from the information provided. It fits. Don’t over explain it, don’t add something to it, don’t take anything away from it. It is harmony. Complete understanding.

This is so important to finally realize because then we can harmonize the old testament sacrifices and covenants and assumptions of Enoch and Elijah and understand how they actually all fit together. With complete harmony we can say that in the Book of Numbers[wanderings] when Moses lead Israel in the wilderness, Moses struck the rock. Now this is all parables, and the rock is a picture of Christ, Christ is the rock[do you see] the water is a picture of His sacrifice and of His “spilled” blood[do you see]. It was not the rock and the water that was of importance to God, it is spiritual salvation, God wants to save Israel, and uses parables such as the rock, to point to the spiritual salvation that is Christ. And so when Moses struck the rock twice, it was like killing Christ twice. “Thou shall not leave thy soul in Hades, or see corruption”[during the time of the cross, because Christ had already died once, this proved His awesomeness, yet it is sad nobody will recognize it] for this reason Moses was not allowed into the Promised land, Moses broke the commandment given by God to him. It is a parable, a picture pointing to the sacrifice of the Lamb slain.
 
(Cont)
The realization of Christ being the Lamb slain before the foundation is of ultimate importance, because now we can understand what a lot of the parables mean, what the sacrifices meant and why men were taken into heaven, we can understand from this that there is no purgatory because now we have a better understanding and in this harmony there is absolutely no room for purgatory or baptism[remember the rock Moses struck? The “water” pointed to the “blood” of Christ, this was a “spiritual” truth. to be “baptized” in water and spirit means to be cleansed in Christ who is the word, *John 1:14 “and the word became flesh and dwelt among us” and the word of God is found today in the bible, and to be washed by the Holy Spirit. Nothing to do with water being poured on your head, that is a misinterpretation, it is ceremonial and a tradition of man.] Or communion[tradition of man]. Why, because now with complete harmony we can understand better the true purpose of God.

Remember the Great Commission to the church was to go out and spread the gospel, they were not to understand every little thing, this was not for them, what they were for was to spread the word, because faith comes by hearing and hearing by the word of God. did they understand all of it, no, but that did no matter, it was the hearing and obeying that mattered.

Furthermore, it is true there is no hard and fast teaching on this subject from a church, so then it is up to the person to study the bible and the holy spirit to give understanding. This applies to everybody Christ has saved[predestined]. All of those people who are predestined are apart of the true spiritual church, these people are the Wheat, all those who are not predestined, will live there life believing they are saved, yet they are not saved, these people are tares. And so now we can understand the parable of the wheat and the tares. And you are telling me that I should check who has the ultimate authority, considering predestination, it is safe to say that the sin of man will lead to corruption, corruption infiltrates everything, even over time, a church, that is because not everybody is saved, there are those who will be under the wrath of God, and believing on God is not an indicator or guarantee that you are saved. The only way to be saved is to beg for mercy that maybe you might be saved because nothing we do will change our names not being written in the book of life. But I believe a person must realize this somehow, must come to this understanding before they can safely assume that they are on the path to salvation. Because they are not listening to the bible, not the whole bible, and so it is a different gospel they listen to. I only say that because many are so knowledgeable of the word, yet out of pride they deny any new understanding or teaching, that is a bad indicator of being a child of God, when you are not receptive to the word of God, no matter where it comes from, Truth is truth.

All of these people have the inalienable right to open their bible, and have the Holy Spirit poured on them and God will open their eyes. Sense they have been chosen ‘before’ the foundation, it is a mystery how God will direct them into His word, but when it happens, “faith comes by hearing and hearing by the word of God”, so then God applies the knowledge and truth by the holy spirit, that is Gods job, and so in this example there is absolutely no room for baptism and sacraments because a person is either saved or not, and the work was already done, and so we can only wait on the Lord.

However by trusting the bible first and foremost, that person who is saved will see the spiritual truth. Now that we know not everybody who calls on the name of the Lord is saved, this puts a lot of things into perspective. Such as me joining my church and getting baptized. Because I love God because that is who I am it seems, and because I want to be saved I join the church and become baptized because that is what I was told to do, thereby proving my love and loyalty to Christ, and being reassured I can go to heaven, yet apparently, even after I go through all of that, if it just so happens I am not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain before the foundation, then I will never be saved and I will always be under the wrath of God and I will surely die. It doesn’t seem fair, does it, and so I keep reading the bible for further understanding. This might be a good indicator that I am saved, because I have a desire to continue to read and learn, however I am guaranteed nothing.

However I feel to recognize this is of utmost importance because it is from the mouth of God. If my church cant explain it, or you, then that is very unfortunate, because it is clearly written about in the bible.
 
Where does the Bible instruct one to interpret by comparing Scripture to Scripture? I read that obedience to rightful authority is commanded:

…"The Scribes and the Pharisees have taken thier seat on the chair of Moses. Therefore, do and observe all things whatsoever they tell you, but do not follow their examle. For they preach but do not practice. Matthew 23:2-3.

And, we are not at liberty to decide for ourselves through inductive or deductive reasoning, as you have done, to come up with our own doctrine…

*Know this first of all, that there is no prophecy of scripture that is a matter of personal interpretation. For no prophecy ever came through human will; but rather human beings moved by the Holy Spirit spoke under the influence of God. *

Since you have not been commisioned to do so, you have no authority to make these claims, particularly since they differ from the original teaching of the apostles. No offense, but, I think they know a little more about God than you do, plus we know they were inspired by the Holy Spirit. The Scriptures say so. So, you see, your laborious work has been vain. I’m sorry, and I know you are very much convinced of your doctrine, but, your interpretation has to be in error because it differs from the human beings’ to whom this was ordained.
 
Is 28:10 For precept must be upon precept, precept upon precept, line upon line, line upon line, here a little, there a little.

1 Corinthians 2:13
These things we also speak, not in words which man’s wisdom teaches but which the Holy Spirit teaches, comparing spiritual things with spiritual.
 
You took those two little verses and interpreted that to mean go ahead and make your own doctrine other than the one that has been taught through the ages? :confused:

That was it?

You don’t consider that risky?
 
“Jesus said to Nicodemus:
“No one has gone up to heaven
except the one who has come down from heaven, the Son of Man”

– Then I wonder where Enoch and Elijah went?
Moses wrote that “Enoch walked with God: and he was not; for God took him” (Gen. 5:24). Paul recorded the same event by saying that Enoch “was found not, because God had translated him” (Heb. 11:5).

The original Greek word for “translate” is metatithemi, the primary meaning being to convey to another place, to transfer. This same Greek word is rendered “carried over” in Acts 7:16. Here we read that after Jacob died his body was “carried over” – transported, translated – to Sychem where he was buried.

That is why Moses said that God took Enoch. God removed – translated – him so that he was not found. God took Enoch and buried him.

In Deuteronomy 34:6 we read also how God took Moses from the people after which he died and was buried by God. “But no man knoweth his sepulcher unto this day.” God removed Moses – translated him – and he was not found either.

“And all the days of Enoch were three hundred and sixty five years” (Gen. 5:23). So Enoch lived only for 365 years, and then he died. The Scriptures say “And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment” (Heb. 9:27). Enoch was no exception.

But what could Paul have meant by saying: “By faith Enoch was translated that he should not see death; and was not found because God had translated him”? This verse does not say Enoch did not die. Rather, it says that Enoch “should not see death.” But what does it mean?

The Bible mentions of two deaths (The second death is mentioned in Rev. 20:6). The first death is appointed unto men (Heb. 9:27). All die that death. It cannot be humanly evaded. That death Enoch died. Paul was not writing about that death. The phrase “should not see” is conditional and has reference to a future event. This death that Enoch escaped by being translated is one that he can escape in the future on certain conditions.

Did Jesus ever speak of a death that might be escaped? In John 8:51 Jesus said: “Verily, verily, I say unto you, If a man keep my saying, he shall never see death” – shall never see – that is, suffer the second death. And again in John 11:26, “Whatsoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die” – or “shall not die forever.”

This death is one that can be escaped on condition men keep the saying of Jesus and believe in Him. This death is not the first death, because Christians who keep Jesus’ sayings die this first death. Therefore the death which Enoch should escape must be the second death which will never touch those who are in the first resurrection (Rev. 20:6). And Enoch will be in the first resurrection because he met the conditions.

Now we can see that Hebrews 11:5 mentions two translations. One was a translation on condition of faith that Enoch, in the future, “should not see death.” This is a figurative translation – a figurative removal or transference from the spiritual darkness of this world into the light of the Kingdom of God (Col. 1:13). But not only was Enoch figuratively taken from the society of his day, he was also literally removed – translated – so that he was not found. God took Enoch physically away from the people, just as He later took Moses. And God buried each so well that neither has ever been found since.

So, really, no one has gone up to heaven, except Christ.
 
Could Elijah have been taken to heaven when Jesus Himself said that “No man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man”?

There are three heavens mentioned in the Bible, not just one. If Jesus said no man had ever ascended to heaven where He came from, then the heaven into which Elijah was taken was a different heaven. But which was it?

The third heaven is the heaven of God’s throne, where Jesus is today. Jesus, being the High Priest of God, is the only one who has the right to be in that heaven with the Father.

The second heaven represents the expanse of this great universe – the space where we find the sun, moon, stars and all the planets and heavenly objects. We find the Psalmist admiring the “heavens, the work of thy fingers, the moon, and the stars, which thou hast ordained” (Psalm 8:3; also Gen. 1:15-17).

Besides the heaven of the stars, we find that the atmosphere (the air that surrounds this earth), is also called heaven. Gen. 1:20 says of “fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven.” In blessing Jacob, Isaac said, “God give thee of the dew of heaven,” and Moses joyed that the “heavens shall drop down dew” (Gen. 27:28; Deut. 33:28).

This first heaven, from which dew comes, means the atmosphere, where the clouds and the wind roam. Now, the Scripture tells us that “…Elijah went up by a whirlwind into heaven” (II Kings 2:1, 11). Since Elijah could not have gone to the heaven of God’s throne, he must have “went up by a whirlwind” into this earth’s atmosphere, the first heaven. There could be no whirlwind in any other place but in the atmosphere surrounding this earth in the first heaven, in which the birds fly.

God merely took Elijah from one place and set him in another, since about ten years later we find a letter from Elijah being sent to the Jewish king (II Chron. 21:12-15). The letter he had others deliver was recognized as his – proving that he was known to be alive someplace. Just how much longer he lived, the Bible does not reveal. But because “it is appointed unto men once to die,” Elijah must have died somewhat later.

In the NT, we find a similar incident of a man of God being taken away and transported to another place. After baptizing the eunuch, “the Spirit of the Lord caught away Philip” – Philip was taken away just like Elijah, and like Elijah, those who witnessed the event saw him disappear from sight – “that the eunuch SAW HIM NO MORE… ” (Acts 8:39). But Philip was found in another place, as the next verse tells us that, “Philip was found at Azotus: and passing through he preached in all the cities…”
 
“Jesus said to Nicodemus:
“No one has gone up to heaven
except the one who has come down from heaven, the Son of Man”

– Then I wonder where Enoch and Elijah went?
This scripture is very easy to understand. Noone has gone to heaven in the way Jesus did, as God. Every good person of course went to heaven, as it says “no one” meaning everyone. So it’s clear from this scripture that when Abraham, Noah, King David and of course Elijah and the prophets died, they went to heaven.

When it said ‘no one has gone to heaven”, as another poster says, this is referring to “limbo”, so the phase ‘no one has gone to heaven’ actually means ‘everyone has gone to limbo’ (a waiting place). Then the scripture says “except the one who has come down from heaven, the Son of Man" meaning Jesus was the first one to come down from heaven and therefore he is the first one to RETURN to heaven.

So the scripture is not saying good people didn’t go to heaven before Jesus it’s saying Jesus is the only son of God that died and returned to heaven. Everyone either when to heave nor Limbo.
 
Many Catholic mystics have identified the two witnesses of Revelations as being Enoch and Elijah. Perhaps God didn’t take them to Heaven, but rather translated them forward in time.
 
Some interesting posts. Incidentally, we recognize Philip as having bilocated to minister to the eunuch. Several people of extraordinary holiness have been known to do the same over the centuries.
 
This scripture is very easy to understand. Noone has gone to heaven in the way Jesus did, as God. Every good person of course went to heaven, as it says “no one” meaning everyone. So it’s clear from this scripture that when Abraham, Noah, King David and of course Elijah and the prophets died, they went to heaven.
I don’t understand this. How can “no one” mean “everyone”? If you tell your friends, “No one has been to my house,” do you mean to say that everyone has been to your house?

The apostle Peter, filled with the Holy Spirit declared of King David: “Men and brethren, let me freely speak unto you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his sepulchre is with us unto this day” (Acts 2:29).

Not only is King David dead and buried according to Peter, his tomb is still “with us unto this day.” If we are to believe Peter’s words, King David has not gone to heaven. And Peter didn’t leave us any room for doubt as to what he meant by being dead and buried when he concluded his speech with: “For David is not ascended into the heavens…” (Acts 2:34).

And Abraham – and all the prophets of God – where are they now? The Jews confronted Jesus with these words: “Art thou greater than our father Abraham, which is dead? and the prophets are dead: whom makest thou thyself?” (John 8:53). Did Jesus deny that Abraham and the prophets were still dead? No. His reference to Abraham in the past tense (v. 56) clearly shows He was in perfect agreement with them as regards to Abraham and the prophets’ condition at that time. They were all still dead and buried.
When it said ‘no one has gone to heaven”, as another poster says, this is referring to “limbo”, so the phase ‘no one has gone to heaven’ actually means ‘everyone has gone to limbo’ (a waiting place). Then the scripture says “except the one who has come down from heaven, the Son of Man" meaning Jesus was the first one to come down from heaven and therefore he is the first one to RETURN to heaven.
The problem with that theology is it has no scriptural basis. Even the Catholic Church, who came up with the concept of limbo is now considering discarding that theology.
So the scripture is not saying good people didn’t go to heaven before Jesus it’s saying Jesus is the only son of God that died and returned to heaven. Everyone either when to heave nor Limbo.
King David, Enoch, Elijah, Abraham, Moses, and all of God’s prophets could not have risen from the dead ahead of Jesus [and gone to heaven] because Jesus is, “the first begotten of the dead” (Rev. 1:5). He is “the beginning, the FIRSTBORN from the dead; that in all things he might have the PREEMINENCE” (Col. 1:18).

Jesus would not have preeminence if others were resurrected ahead of Him. That’s why the Scriptures say He is “the FIRST that should rise from the dead” (Acts 26:23). No one went ahead of him. He has preeminence above all human beings. He is the first to have been resurrected and the first to enter heaven. (Interestingly, the Bible nowhere says heaven is the reward of the saved.)

The Scriptures are clear on what happens to the dead – even to the righteous dead. Their “thoughts perish” (Psalm 146:4). They “know not anything” (Eccl. 9:5). They cannot give thanks to the Lord (Psalm 6:5). Why? “For in death there is NO REMEMBRANCE of thee…” (same verse).

If the righteous dead are with God in heaven, they would be giving thanks and praising Him. But we find the Scriptures telling us that, “the grave CANNOT PRAISE THEE, death cannot celebrate thee: they that go down into the pit cannot hope for thy truth” (Isa. 38:18).

Yes, when dead, we cannot also hope to know the truth simply because nothing in us is left alive. All our thoughts have perished. Everything in us is dead. In fact, our death is no different from those of beasts. “For that which befalleth the sons of men befalleth beasts; even one thing befalleth them: as the one dieth, so dieth the other; yea, they have all one breath; so that a man hath no preeminence above a beast” (Ecc. 3:19).
 
So is there a new general consensus here that Enoch and Elijah actually died,
as all the other prophets? Well, it doesn’t matter, if they’re still in “the bosom of
Abraham”, the “waiting room” of the righteous.

But, if they did die, there is a new question. The Old Testament says that Elijah
will return, and if he died, that means he would return from the dead. We have never
believed in returning from the dead before, here, to earth.
 
So is there a new general consensus here that Enoch and Elijah actually died,
as all the other prophets? Well, it doesn’t matter, if they’re still in “the bosom of
Abraham”, the “waiting room” of the righteous…
The dictionary defines “bosom” as: The breast of a person; the security and intimacy of or like that of being hugged to someone’s bosom; an intimate relationship.

Being in “Abraham’s bosom” simply means having an intimate relationship with him. So, when Jesus said that Lazarus “was carried by the angels into Abraham’s bosom,” He meant Lazarus was taken into an intimate relationship with Abraham – at the time of the resurrection and not before.

Lazarus is pictured in Christ’s parable as a person, perhaps even a Gentile, who received salvation. When a Gentile is converted and become Christ’s, Paul says: “And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed [children], and heirs according to the promise” (Gal. 3:29). Through Christ, Gentiles become the children of Abraham. Through faith we all become “the children of Abraham” (Gal. 3:7). That is an intimate relationship with Abraham. That is being taken into Abraham’s bosom.

Notice these Scriptures where the word “bosom” is used.

“He shall feed his flock like a shepherd: he shall gather the lambs with his arm, and carry them in his bosom, and shall gently lead those that are with young” (Isa. 40:11).

“… the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father…” (Jn. 1:18).

“… Have I begotten them, that thou shouldest say unto me, Carry them in thy bosom, as a nursing father beareth the sucking child…?” (Num. 11:12).

In all these texts, to be in one’s bosom is to have that one’s love and protection. In Lazarus’ case he was taken into the love and protection of Abraham – into an intimate relationship with Abraham. He attained this by becoming a [spiritual] child of Abraham through faith in Christ.
 
So is there a new general consensus here that Enoch and Elijah actually died,
as all the other prophets? Well, it doesn’t matter, if they’re still in “the bosom of
Abraham”, the “waiting room” of the righteous.

But, if they did die, there is a new question. The Old Testament says that Elijah
will return, and if he died, that means he would return from the dead. We have never
believed in returning from the dead before, here, to earth.
The prophecy on Elijah (Malachi 4:5-6) refers to the time immediately before God’s intervention in human affairs, prophetically called the “day of the Lord” (also called “the Lord’s day” in Rev. 1:10). Jesus spoke about this prophecy in Matthew 17. He showed that the work of John the Baptist was a preliminary fulfillment of Malachi’s prophecy:

“And his disciples asked him, saying, Why then say the scribes that Elias [Elijah] must first come? And Jesus answered and said unto them, Elias truly shall first come, and restore all things. But I say unto you, That Elias is come already, and they knew him not, but have done unto him whatsoever they listed. Likewise shall also the Son of man suffer of them. Then the disciples understood that he spake unto them of John the Baptist” (Matt. 17:10-13).

Luke was also inspired to write about the work of John: “And he [John] shall go before him in the spirit and power of Elias, to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the disobedient to the wisdom of the just; to make ready a people prepared for the Lord” (Luke 1:17).

Luke said John was “in the spirit and power of Elijah,” NOT that he was literally Elijah. That Elijah had died centuries before. But John the Baptist was empowered by the same spirit which had guided the Elijah of old to point Israel’s eyes to the true God, and for much the same purpose.

An Elijah is yet to come, however, said Christ – after John was already dead. So, just as John the Baptist was the forerunner of Jesus Christ at his first coming, another is to come before the great and terrible Day of the Lord, as a forerunner of Jesus Christ at His second coming. He, like John, will come in the spirit and power of Elijah to fulfill Malachi’s prophecy.

Elijah is dead in the dust of the earth. And yes, he will return from the dead, but not before the appointed time – during the resurrection of the just – at the second coming of Jesus Christ!
 
“Jesus said to Nicodemus:
“No one has gone up to heaven
except the one who has come down from heaven, the Son of Man”

– Then I wonder where Enoch and Elijah went?
He meant no one on earth, except for him. H’enoch and Elijah did not descend from heaven, they had only ascended.

You must descend from heaven to enter the kingdom of heaven, it is the meaning of the name of the son of God, which must be believed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top