M
Mayita30
Guest
I think there are so many canon lawyers or people who know more than a priest here so I better back out already… My marriage was annulled due to non-consummation with impotency on his part. As a practicing catholic, I have lived chastely all my life and have thus rpoven the rato no consumado marriage easily by virtue of the proof of viriginity. The marriage has been annulled. Period… I would have wanted to stay in the marraige despite not being consummated but his illness got worse and worse and tried to kill meCan. 1061 §1. A
is called ratum tantum if it has not been consummated; it is called ratum et consummatum if the spouses have performed between themselves in a human fashion a conjugal act which is suitable in itself for the procreation of offspring, to which marriage is ordered by its nature and by which the spouses become one flesh.Code:valid marriage between the baptized
§2. After a marriage has been celebrated, if the spouses have lived together consummation is presumed until the contrary is proven.
§3. An invalid marriage is called putative if at least one party celebrated it in good faith, until both parties become certain of its nullity.
Can. 1142 For a just cause, the Roman Pontiff can dissolve a non-consummated marriage between baptized persons or between a baptized party and a non-baptized party at the request of both parties or of one of them, even if the other party is unwilling.
I would not ask you to reveal intimate details about your marital history here, but perhaps your marriage was both unconsummated, but found null for some legitimate ground (either perpetual and antecedent impotence or some other ground)?:twocents:
By my understanding, the Church;s teaching is that (unimpeded) consent makes a valid marriage; consummation makes a (already valid) marriage indissoluble.
tee
Not A Canon Lawyer
With regards to the Original poster, if the marriage is doing well and you choose to live in a Josephite marriage, you can can have that convalidated int he Church.