Judge rejects Obama administration’s request to lift stem-cell funding ban

  • Thread starter Thread starter Soutane
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

Soutane

Guest
Judge rejects Obama administration’s request to lift stem-cell funding ban
September 08, 2010
A federal judge on September 7 rejected the Obama administration’s request to lift his temporary ban on federal funding of embryonic stem-cell research.

“In this Court’s view, a stay would flout the will of Congress, as this Court understands what Congress has enacted in the Dickey-Wicker Amendment,” Judge Royce Lamberth wrote, referring to 1995 legislation that banned federal funding for the destruction of human embryos. “Congress has mandated that the public interest is served by preventing taxpayer funding of research that entails the destruction of human embryos

catholicculture.org/news/headlines/index.cfm?storyid=7493
 
Good.

I don’t see why the Federal Government doesn’t try other forms of stem cell research. Research that doesn’t involve stem cells from an aborted baby. Research using Adult Stem Cells. Sure, they don’t have as much potential as embryonic stem cells. But at least you don’t have to kill someone to get them.
 
Good.

I don’t see why the Federal Government doesn’t try other forms of stem cell research. Research that doesn’t involve stem cells from an aborted baby. Research using Adult Stem Cells. Sure, they don’t have as much potential as embryonic stem cells. But at least you don’t have to kill someone to get them.
Actually the Scientific world has found adult stem cells to be much more efficacious that the stem cells of murdered babies.Most conciencious scientists have abandoned aborted stem cells in favour of donor adult cells as they are much more versatile.It is only the pro-abortion lobby and their god Molloch-Obama who are determined to pursue this scientific dead end as it conflicts with their "vision"of how the world should be.Sort of like little kids but not as murderous.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top