Judging salvation

  • Thread starter Thread starter CMatt25
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m secure in my faith…If you feel people must to Catholic to know God’s fullness that’s fine with me…I don’t think followers of Christ have to follow you pope or your to be saved…My faith in Christ has be working for me for almost 40 years…It will take me through to my time being up or His return…
Amen!

Your faith, that is, your love of God in your heat, is strong.

Yet we are called to love God with our entire heart, MIND, soul and strength. And if you can’t know who God is, what Truth He proclaims, then you cannot love God with your entire MIND. If you don’t know if baptism saves you, if you’re OSAS, if you’re committing adultery if you’re divorced and remarry, if the Eucharist is the Body/Blood/Soul and Divinity…then you can’t know Him and love Him with your entire MIND.
 
I just know that I know…Anyone who had a conversion experience knows the Holy Spirit’s working in their lives…
I had the same conversion experience so yes I too know the Holy Spirit is alive and well in my life. How are you dear brother. God Bless you and your family:)
 
I’m secure in my faith…If you feel people must to Catholic to know God’s fullness that’s fine with me…I don’t think followers of Christ have to follow you pope or your to be saved…My faith in Christ has be working for me for almost 40 years…It will take me through to my time being up or His return…His church is beyond your Catholic church…
How right you are. My faith in Jesus has been working for almost 40 years too and grows stronger every day. His Church will always be there in our hearts.
 
Hi Matt,

As you can see from reading the posts on this thread I’m being given the run around. Since you’re the Original Poster let me allow you the opportunity to answer a straight question. Is Unam Sanctum an infallible ex cathedra statement? And I will accept “I don’t know” as an answer. So if you’re up to answering my question here are your options:

a) Yes, Unam Sanctum is an infallible ex cathedra statement.
b) No, Unam Sanctum is not an infallible ex cathedra statement.
c) I don’t know if Unam Sanctum is an infallible ex cathedra statement.

This is not a trick question. It is just a question. Please answer it. All you need to do is highlight one of the three options and copy and paste it into your post. Many thanks. 🙂

Appreciatively,
Mick
👍
I can see.

I assume you mean if the Church says the statement is infallible in ex cathedra. So my answer is…

c) I don’t know if Unam Sanctum is an infallible ex cathedra statement.

Btw you’re not hijacking my thread. 🙂
 
Infallibility is a tricky thing and interpretations of it vary from bishop to bishop, from apologist to apologist, from CAF forum member to member…many think there have only been TWO infallible statements by the Church. I’ve heard a legion of priests tell me that. And yet you’ll hear ten different opinions by ten different people.
 
Never in her History and her existence that the Catholic Church has declared that someone is in Hell. We have many saints who by their earthly lives may be accorded heaven; even if they went through purgatory their destination is heaven for certain. But the Church can never know who are sent to Hell and will not make that declaration. God is a merciful and a forgiving God; all sins can be forgiven and we can never know what is in a person’s heart. Sure there are some who will be destined to Hell except that we do not know; it is for God alone to judge, as have been said here.

So maybe that helps to answer the question of the thread.
:confused: If the Church spells out x, y, z, or you could not be saved. And a Catholic does not adhere to x, y, z, and does not Sacramentally repent before death, then why say they could not be saved if they don’t know?
 
Hi again CMatt,

You were entertaining the idea that the Church was guilty of “judging salvation”, a harsh, and in my opinion, seriously mistaken notion that needs to be addressed. Before we could move on to discuss in what ways you question the teachings of the Catholic Church, can you see how it should be a relief to your initial concerns that the Church has never professed to identify who has violated the teaching you cited from Lumen Gentium #14? Do you now see that the Church has not pretended to take the place of God in judging the hearts of men?
No not completely. See my post #46. But I think I understand the Church spells out what She sees as mortal sins and therefore does say what will condemn a Catholic if not Sacramentally repented. What I don’t understand is how this is not identifying. If John Doe, a practicing Catholic does not remain so and does not receive the Sacrament of Reconciliation or Anointing prior to death, then how is the Church not identifying John Doe as hellbound when She says such a person could not be saved?
 
:confused: If the Church spells out x, y, z, or you could not be saved. And a Catholic does not adhere to x, y, z, and does not Sacramentally repent before death, then why say they could not be saved if they don’t know?
Because one cannot know the degree of another’s ignorance. We cannot know exactly what it is they’re “rejecting” when they reject the Catholic faith.

For example, I have asked a number of ex-Catholics–Catholics who love to claim, “I know exactly what it is that I reject”–where Scripture is in the Mass, and not a single one has been able to tell me.

Now, really, how can a person claim to know the Catholic faith if he doesn’t even know what the Mass is?
 
No not completely. See my post #46. But I think I understand the Church spells out what She sees as mortal sins and therefore does say what will condemn a Catholic if not Sacramentally repented. What I don’t understand is how this is not identifying. If John Doe, a practicing Catholic does not remain so and does not receive the Sacrament of Reconciliation or Anointing prior to death, then how is the Church not identifying John Doe as hellbound when She says such a person could not be saved?
Objectively speaking, we could say that someone who commits a mortal sin is condemned. (And, would really want it any other way, Matt? Do you want someone who commits murder not to receive justice?).

Yet, subjectively, we cannot know the degree to which that person is culpable. That’s for God to determine.

Similarly, as St. John Vianney (I think?) said, when asked about the status of a soul who committed suicide by jumping off a bridge: we don’t know, because we don’t know if this poor soul repented of his sin between jumping off the bridge and hitting the water.
 
No not completely. See my post #46. But I think I understand the Church spells out what She sees as mortal sins and therefore does say what will condemn a Catholic if not Sacramentally repented. What I don’t understand is how this is not identifying. If John Doe, a practicing Catholic does not remain so and does not receive the Sacrament of Reconciliation or Anointing prior to death, then how is the Church not identifying John Doe as hellbound when She says such a person could not be saved?
How many mortal sins do you have besides blasphemy of the Holy Spirit … ? All sin is damaging to our spiritual health…We are told not to even associate with a “brother” who continually gets drunk or is living an immoral life…
 
How many mortal sins do you have besides blasphemy of the Holy Spirit … ? All sin is damaging to our spiritual health…We are told not to even associate with a “brother” who continually gets drunk or is living an immoral life…
Indeed. All sin is offensive to God. How many mortal sins are there? The CC does not teach there’s a finite number–it’s a sin that involves grave matter, done with full consent.

“If any one sees his brother committing what is not a mortal sin, he will ask, and God will give him life for those whose sin is not mortal. There is sin which is mortal; I do not say that one is to pray for that. All wrongdoing is sin, but there is sin which is not mortal” (1 Jn 5:16-17).
 
I love 1 John, lot of good stuff.

And this is the confidence that we have in him, that, if we ask any thing according to his will, he heareth us:
15 And if we know that he hear us, whatsoever we ask, we know that we have the petitions that we desired of him.
16 If any man see his brother sin a sin which is not unto death, he shall ask, and he shall give him life for them that sin not unto death. There is a sin unto death: I do not say that he shall pray for it.
17 All unrighteousness is sin: and there is a sin not unto death.
18 We know that whosoever is born of God sinneth not; but he that is begotten of God keepeth himself, and that wicked one toucheth him not.

It says there is a sin unto death…When did your church start making a list ? I’m guessing from this your mortal sin comes from a sin unto dearth and venial comes from a sin not unto death…Like I said and you agree…Any sin can start building a wall to a hardened heart that only the Holy Spirit can soften up…
 
Objectively speaking, we could say that someone who commits a mortal sin is condemned. (And, would really want it any other way, Matt? Do you want someone who commits murder not to receive justice?).

Yet, subjectively, we cannot know the degree to which that person is culpable. That’s for God to determine.

Similarly, as St. John Vianney (I think?) said, when asked about the status of a soul who committed suicide by jumping off a bridge: we don’t know, because we don’t know if this poor soul repented of his sin between jumping off the bridge and hitting the water.
I don’t judge either because I don’t know someone’s reason or if they confessed directly to God bypassing the Sacraments for reconcilliation. So I just believe the wording in Church documents should be changed from they **could not **be saved to something less certain. Peace and I just read your signature. Thanks for your prayers. 🙂
 
It says there is a sin unto death…When did your church start making a list ? I’m guessing from this your mortal sin comes from a sin unto dearth and venial comes from a sin not unto death…Like I said and you agree…Any sin can start building a wall to a hardened heart that only the Holy Spirit can soften up…
When did our church start making a list? What? Who said our church made a list? :confused:

I will say that the concept of NOT having mortal vs venial sin is a relatively new concept. All the early Christians, as manifested by the Early Church Fathers, believed in mortal vs venial sin.
 
What if you knew it was* Jesus *telling you that you must attend Mass on a weekday Holy Day of Obligation or else you are committing mortal sin and face hell for that? *Then *would you believe it?
Definitely if Jesus had said I must attend on a weekday HDoO to obey and avoid mortal sin but another Catholic in another country does not, then I would know.
 
When did our church start making a list? What? Who said our church made a list? :confused:

I will say that the concept of NOT having mortal vs venial sin is a relatively new concept. All the early Christians, as manifested by the Early Church Fathers, believed in mortal vs venial sin.
I have many times in this forum seen where people ask for the list of mortal/venial sins and they were given a list…What years did the mortal/venial designations appear…I know about the blasphemy of the Holy Spirit…Thanks…
 
No not completely. See my post #46. But I think I understand the Church spells out what She sees as mortal sins and therefore does say what will condemn a Catholic if not Sacramentally repented. What I don’t understand is how this is not identifying. If John Doe, a practicing Catholic does not remain so and does not receive the Sacrament of Reconciliation or Anointing prior to death, then how is the Church not identifying John Doe as hellbound when She says such a person could not be saved?
Hi again CMatt,

The Church can not know and makes no claim to know among those who are outside of the visible Church, whether they are guilty of “knowing that the Catholic Church was made necessary by Christ.” This teaching is benign, almost toothless. I can’t know the hearts either, but it seems unlikely that very many of those who stay outside the Catholic Church or of those who would leave would ever qualify for “knowing that the Catholic Church was made necessary by Christ.”

My other concern is about why you keep saying that this sin, if it has ever been committed, would have to be sacramentally repented. That is contrary to the mercy of God and the teaching of the Church. Obviously, those outside the Church are not going to avail themselves of the ordinary means of grace and salvation via the Sacraments. But the Church definitively teaches that God is not bound to the Sacraments.

There is a wonderful story told by Abbe Trucho in his biography of the Cure of Ars, St. Jean Vianney, that is fully compatible with the teaching of the Church regarding the way we may hope for the salvation of ANYBODY. The good saint saw a poor lady in deep grief in his church one day. Her husband, a blasphemer who disregarded his wife’s pleas to be reconciled with the Catholic Church, had leapt from a bridge, committing suicide. This was the cause of her grief, having almost no hope for his salvation. The Cure, however was given insight from God into the final condition of things for this soul. It would seem that unknown to his wife, the man had once or twice passed a statue of the Blessed Virgin which he had allowed his wife to keep in their home, and he secretly prayed an Ave without anyone’s knowledge, while continuing with his obstinate ways, even up to the point of almost final despair. Consoling the woman, who had never even revealed the cause of her grief, the Cure not only knew the cause, but could comfort her with the revelation that before he struck the water, a miracle of perfect contrition was permitted her husband as a favor for having said those secret Aves, and though in purgatory, he was saved and would be in heaven forever!

You have to agree that is a wonderful story. Even if one doesn’t have the faith to believe the story it illustrates what some of us have been trying to say to you about the merciful teachings of the Catholic faith. The Church would have us hope for every soul that has ever died. That doesn’t mean it is always a good hope. Assuredly, the poor widow in the story above had many miore reasons to fear than to hope for her husband. But no one knows how many who lived their lives in opposition to the Catholic Church have been saved in ways similar to the suicide described in the biography of the Cure of Ars. Our Lady of Fatima admonishes us to add to the prayers of the Rosary, “Oh my Jesus, forgive us our sins, save all souls from hell, ESPECIALLY THOSE MOST IN NEED OF THY MERCY.”

CMatt, you seem to think the Catholic Church is in conflict with the merciful and good God who wills the salvation of every soul. It is truly painful for me to see a struggling brother so apparently blind to the love for all men that is manifested in this and all the teachings of the Catholic Church. I am trying very hard because it seems to me, that if you continue to have these unnecessary misgivings, you will not remain Catholic. You can’t love the Church while thinking she is harsh and judgmental. These are serious charges that you raise against her. Allow me to summarize for now how I understand the question you have raised.

#1) The Catholic Church does not judge the hearts of men.
#2) Those outside the Catholic Church may be saved non-sacramentally.
#3) Those inside the Catholic Church may be saved non-sacramentally.
#4) Any guilt associated with Lumen Gentium 14, is contingent. It is contingent on something that no one can know except God, namely, the level of knowledge required to be responsible and accountable to be affiliated with the Catholic Church. Since the guilt is acknowledged to be contingent upon information that no one has except God, it is erroneous to assert on the basis of this teaching that the Catholic Church is guilty of “judging salvation.”

God bless you dear brother. I’ll keep you in prayers.

Rory
 
Rory, that was very well said!

You raised some questions/fears I’d been asking myself as well, and have stated the position of the Church very well.
 
Hey…Prayer request …Got to go…My DIL and grandbaby were in a bad car crash…She is pretty rough …thanks
She is a believer…
 
SSTeacher;6570201:
Hi Matt,

As you can see from reading the posts on this thread I’m being given the run around. Since you’re the Original Poster let me allow you the opportunity to answer a straight question. Is Unam Sanctum
an infallible ex cathedra statement? And I will accept “I don’t know” as an answer. So if you’re up to answering my question here are your options:

a) Yes, Unam Sanctum is an infallible ex cathedra statement.
b) No, Unam Sanctum is not an infallible ex cathedra statement.
c) I don’t know if Unam Sanctum is an infallible ex cathedra statement.

This is not a trick question. It is just a question. Please answer it. All you need to do is highlight one of the three options and copy and paste it into your post. Many thanks. 🙂

Appreciatively,
Mick
:thumbsup:I can see.

I assume you mean if the Church says the statement is infallible in ex cathedra. So my answer is…

c) I don’t know if Unam Sanctum is an infallible ex cathedra statement.
Many thanks for your honesty.
Btw you’re not hijacking my thread. 🙂
OK. Thanks for the encouragement. 🙂

Appreciatively,
Mick
👍
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top