S
seekerz
Guest
Different gases in the atmosphere means that the effects of the same heat source on both is likely to be poorly comparable.Except they both have the same heat source.
Different gases in the atmosphere means that the effects of the same heat source on both is likely to be poorly comparable.Except they both have the same heat source.
Not to mention difference in gas density, strength of gravitational pull, tidal effects of it’s moons, etc, etc, etc.Different gases in the atmosphere means that the effects of the same heat source on both is likely to be poorly comparable.
I’m glad you put the winkie at the end. I was starting to think I woke up in the Twilight Zone…The concern about climate change on Earth isn’t that it is occurring,. We know from history climate change has been a regular feature. The concern is that human activity is causing changes in Earth at a rate unseen in history.
Similarly, the concern with Jupiter is that human activity is driving global warming on the King of the Planets. So far we have sent eight probes to the Jupiter, for a gravitational wind-up if not actually to study the Jovian environment.
Obviously, these artificial satellites with which we have besieged poor Jupiter has created unprecedented tidal forces. And those forces are the cause of the massive warming of the core. So the question arises: should we cancel future missions to Jupiter? Is it right to sacrifice a planet for the temporary, and limited, good of a few humans?
![]()
[sign]save jupiter!!![/sign]stop the anthroprogenic liquefication of jupiter’s core!
Good stewardship makes sense, it’s also our duty.That is awesome!
I agree we should be good steward of the planet the God gave us.
So Jupiter is not a world? We are talking about the planet, not the god.Technically speaking, this is not world news.![]()
yea its usually the woman’s faultAnyone can see by watching the western skies that Venus is responsible for this.
So the amount of heat from the heat source isn’t a factor? Science says otherwise.Different gases in the atmosphere means that the effects of the same heat source on both is likely to be poorly comparable.
Exactly Jupiter is a far different planet from Earth. For instance according to this. skepticalscience.com/global-warming-on-jupiter-intermediate.htm Jupiter only receives 4% of the suns energy received by earth and radiates more the twice the heat it receives from the sun. Not to mention there has been no warming trend in solar output if anything maybe a small decline. But yeah Jupiter is just vastly different from Earth.Different gases in the atmosphere means that the effects of the same heat source on both is likely to be poorly comparable.
From the souce:Exactly Jupiter is a far different planet from Earth. For instance according to this. skepticalscience.com/global-warming-on-jupiter-intermediate.htm Jupiter only receives 4% of the suns energy received by earth and radiates more the twice the heat it receives from the sun. Not to mention there has been no warming trend in solar output if anything maybe a small decline. But yeah Jupiter is just vastly different from Earth.
We’ve all seen how modeling the Earth’s climate has worked out. Any reason to believe they can model Jupiter’s any better?In other words, what is predicted is not global warming on Jupiter but a change in the distribution of heat with the equator getting hotter and the poles cooling. It’s also worth mentioning this climate change is yet to be observed - it’s a prediction based on the **modelling **of the disappearing white ovals.
We’ll just have to wait till the next episode of the Big Bang Theory to find out the truth.yea its usually the woman’s fault
Actually while models are not perfect they are pretty good at modeling the earths climate. It also helps a lot that we have alot more data on the earth then we have Jupiter. skepticalscience.com/climate-models-intermediate.htm And we also have direct evidence of the earths warming and evidence to support that it is humans causing much of it.From the souce:
We’ve all seen how modeling the Earth’s climate has worked out. Any reason to believe they can model Jupiter’s any better?
Well, yeah, if carbon dioxide is the primary cause of it. But then how do we get everyone to stop exhaling?And we also have direct evidence of the earths warming and evidence to support that it is humans causing much of it.
Well if you believe alex jones, the answer is fema concentration camps, chemtrails, etc dished out by men in blackWell, yeah, if carbon dioxide is the primary cause of it. But then how do we get everyone to stop exhaling?![]()
Direct evidence? Does anyone besides you have this evidence?Actually while models are not perfect they are pretty good at modeling the earths climate. It also helps a lot that we have alot more data on the earth then we have Jupiter. skepticalscience.com/climate-models-intermediate.htm And we also have direct evidence of the earths warming and evidence to support that it is humans causing much of it.