J
Jim_Baur
Guest
Human reason created science and math, no doubt about it.
When investigating inanimate matter moving to animate, is it a fallacious step to assume that inanimate matter did it?
If it is possible that an agent or group of advanced beings moved the inanimate to animate should not human reason investigate it?
When investigating inanimate matter moving to animate, is it a fallacious step to assume that inanimate matter did it?
If it is possible that an agent or group of advanced beings moved the inanimate to animate should not human reason investigate it?