Ever wonder what happens when every kid is held to that same standard of there is no standard? When it’s considered unreasonable to expect a kid to put their name on their paper? Or follow any other guidance like staying in their seat, or not talking when the teacher is, or not texting or placing calls during class?
My daughter just completed her teaching credential. (FWIW- she was classified as gifted and one of those who rarely had to read/study for subjects other than math) She’s had a passion for teaching since she was in high school and started mentoring/tutoring other kids. Got her degree in education, went through the credentialing program run by her university which is about 18 months and consists mostly of teaching in schools in the area, observed and critiqued by teachers and folks from her university. First year, she loved it- felt so rewarding to her, could see marked improvements in her students. Really exciting as a parent to hear her talk about how her challenged students improved, what strategies she applied etc. The school loved her and offered her a full time job with ‘emergency’ credential concurrently with completing her last 6 months of the program. University wouldn’t agree. So, my daughter spent her last 6 months in a charter school.
That charter school runs pretty much on the principal that any discipline or enforcement of guidelines stifles creativity and initiative in the kid. Prevents that ‘out of the box thinking’. She attempted to teach 8th grade. I say attempted, because really, in that kind of environment there’s not much teaching or learning going on in the classroom. Fun for the teacher when every assignment has half the kids names missing from the papers-- despite reminding the kids just prior to them handing them in. Which means she can’t really complete her grade book or enter grades into the mandatory computer system. Which means every assignment required taking either 10 minutes when handing them back or 10 minutes when collecting them of trying to sort out the half which didn’t have names. Of course, since it’s unreasonable to expect kids to be able to function at the level that they can put their name on the paper, it’s unreasonable to expect them to stay still- so they’re free to enter and leave the classroom. Sometimes because they’re bored/uninterested in the subject and expect them to learn to focus on something for 30 minutes that isn’t floating their boat right this second is unreasonable. Sometimes to meet a boyfriend or girlfriend somewhere else in the school… but I digress. Back to grading? Couldn’t really figure out why my daughter had to bother since, she was expected to apply ‘adjustments’ based on each kid vice grading to a standard. Did they have a diagnosed learning disability? Did she suspect an undiagnosed one? Were they an ESL student? What was their primary language? Did she think their home life was supportive of their academic effort? In that environment, the grade meant pretty much nothing-- although the marked up paper did provide exact feedback on -]mistakes/-] sorry, recommendations for approaches/wording/grammar more consistent with standard past usage they should consider. But spelling is pretty much optional and shouldn’t they be given full credit for using real world applied language skills (i.e. writing the same way as a text)?
I do have to admit she enjoyed thoroughly when the university observer was in her classroom one day and had to do an ‘urgent’ correction. That is, tell my daughter to stop a kid and discipline them for sending a text in the class. My daughter had to explain, to the observer’s shocked disbelief, the policy that, yes indeed, authorized students to text/use cell phones in class. As she went back to teaching, another kid looked right at the observer and made a call on their cell phone. According to policy, my daughter just asked the special little flower to step outside to complete it.
My daughter loathed teaching at that school. Trying to cater to every single kid’s desire to not be involved or bored in any particular lesson or activity meant the class was one long continuous series of disruptions or ‘adjustments’ to account for various individuals.