I’m just laughing at all this. You are doing this ‘tour’ for what appears to be the purpose of finding “liberal” things to complain about at one of the more orthodox dioceses in the country. You may be in for a big suprise if you continue this. However, I truly hope you don’t. I hope that you begin to regularly attend your home parish and find a true apostolate to be a part of instead of looking high and low for things to complain about elsewhere.
Hm. Where did you get this impression of the purpose of the tour? I didn’t see it. Also I’m not at all sure what you are talking about with a “big surprise.” It sounds like some kind of warning, but I can’t see what is about.
Also, there is nothing whatsoever wrong with attending Mass at any parish you want. You seem to be accusing the OP of a lack of charity, which you yourself are failing to show the OP.
Once I saw a story in a bulletin which went something like this:
The person telling the story (Person C) was in a grocery store and standing in line. The cashier was new and having problems with the register. The person in the front of the line (Person A) was calm. The second person in line (Person B) looked at his watch, quietly said “I can’t believe this,” and asked another passing store employee to send someone else to help. Person B was (
gasp) buying a pack of cigarettes. Person C was third in line. The point of the story was that Person A was “being Christ-like,” and Person B was “doing bad.”
The problem with this story and its point is that the person telling the story wasn’t being any more Christ-like than Person B. Theoretically (although we have no information on this point, as Person B wasn’t asked about anything), Person B was being selfish and inconsiderate. The nature of the purchase was put into the story to support this point in an undefinable way. Perhaps it was true. Actually, Person B might have been trying to quit, and had gone a long time without one and was going through withdrawal. He might have a bad temper naturally which he was trying hard but unsuccessfully to control. He may have felt that it is reasonable to expect competence from people who are being paid to do a job, and that if the person is too new to be competent, someone should be there to help them. We don’t know, because Person C never spoke to Person B.
What we do know is that Person C was judgmental of Person B, and showed intolerance and lack of understanding. We know about Person C’s motives because of what Person C said in the story. So we have Person C judging Person B for faults that Person B
may have been exhibiting, but that Person C was certainly exhibiting in making the judgement. It was a bit ironic.
It also seems to be a bit similar to what is happening here, except that there is a bit more evidence that the OP was judging the teenager, but no evidence that the OP was “looking high and low for things to complain about elsewhere.” Of course now I am like a hypothetical Person D, who is treating Person C the way they are treating Person B and so forth. I admit it, and I’m sorry if I am being unfair.
Perhaps I understand the OP a little more because the experience of the OP where “the person to my left slapped my arm and grabbed my hand” for the Our Father resonates strongly with me. That idea of coercing people to do things they’re uncomfortable with in the name of “community” bothers me on both logical and personal grounds. After that, I might have gone home and been a bit critical in my blog too, if I had a blog.
–Jen