W
Wannano
Guest
TWIMThat’s what I do. Or more precisely, I use Catholic only if I mean ICWR.
TWIMThat’s what I do. Or more precisely, I use Catholic only if I mean ICWR.
The verse says confessing with the mouth saves so…:shrug:TheI would appreciate if you would show me where I have ever claimed that “no works” are necessary. I could also condescendingly say “there you go again.”
Did I say it did? This verse says we are justified by believing with our heart.
Apologies from me Wannano.I would appreciate if you would show me where I have ever claimed that “no works” are necessary. I could also condescendingly say "there you go again.
Thank you for saying this. I think this is the crux of the difference in theology. When an evangelical says that we are saved by faith alone we mean that we can’t earn our way to eternal life by being good enough or religious enough. Our works of righteousness are but filthy rags to God.It just seems to me that when Paul spoke about works he is talking about Jewish ritual laws and the laws of Moses. Not about doing good works like feeding the hungry or helping the poor etc. When we do any good work or deed do we do it out of love for God and our fellow man or do we do it because we have to like it was a law? Faith being an action work means that if one has faith one then will do good works or deed out of the love for God not because one gets something out of it.
Titus 3It just seems to me that when Paul spoke about works he is talking about Jewish ritual laws and the laws of Moses. Not about doing good works like feeding the hungry or helping the poor etc. When we do any good work or deed do we do it out of love for God and our fellow man or do we do it because we have to like it was a law? Faith being an action work means that if one has faith one then will do good works or deed out of the love for God not because one gets something out of it.
Jesus about many pay lip service but do nothing; yet Jesus also talked those who want everyone to see them and how holy they are, but is meaningless in that its all for show. All through the Gospels we see Jesus doing showing how we are to walk with God and our fellow man. In Acts we see the Apostles helping others which one could say good works or deeds. Did the Apostles do these things good works and or deeds to be saved? No they did it because it was what jesus also did and they did learn from Christ.
Unfortunately I think there is some truth to that lanman87 but I haven’t seen any of that here on this thread.Sadly, there are plenty of people (both in Catholic and Evangelical circles) who think they can earn they way to heaven by being a good enough person.
Thanks for the kind words.Wannano (quoted by James248 here but presumably removed before made permenant) . . .
Apologies from me Wannano.
I did not mean “you” personally. I used your argument to illustrate what “you” in terms of sola fide proponents in some cases are saying here (as in “you guys”).
It was meant to be much broader than your post.
I should have re-worded it. Did not mean to sound “condescending” to you.
Keep up the great posts. Even though I may not agree with them all, you put a lot of heart into them. Respect to you brother.
God saved us in virtue of His mercy. Not because mankind “earned it” by “deeds done by us in righteousness”.TITUS 3:5 5 he saved us, not because of deeds done by us in righteousness, but in virtue of his own mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewal in the Holy Spirit
TITUS 3:3-8 3 For we ourselves were once foolish, disobedient, led astray, slaves to various passions and pleasures, passing our days in malice and envy, hated by men and hating one another; 4 but when the goodness and loving kindness of God our Savior appeared, 5 he saved us, not because of deeds done by us in righteousness, but** in virtue of his own mercy**, by the washing of regeneration and renewal in the Holy Spirit, 6 which he poured out upon us richly through Jesus Christ our Savior, 7 so that we might be justified by his grace and become heirs in hope of eternal life. 8 The saying is sure. I desire you to insist on these things, so that those who have believed in God may be careful to apply themselves to good deeds; these are excellent and profitable to men.TITUS 3:5 5 he saved us, not because of deeds done by us in righteousness, but in virtue of his own mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewal in the Holy Spirit
I accidentally but incorrectly used a double negative.Rather God saved us in “virtue of His mercy” and NOT “not because of deeds done by us in righteousness”.
Rather God saved us in “virtue of His mercy” and “NOT because of deeds done by us in righteousness”.
Amen. Though i only quoted the Scripture. No comment. Sorry about the post you lost! I hate when that happens.RCwitness, what you said about Titus and God’s mercy was awesome and right on.
It’s good to discuss and share (even debate), as long as it’s done in fellowship and charity, right?RCwitness, what you said about Titus and God’s mercy was awesome and right on.
It is , and I will try to be nice.It’s good to discuss and share (even debate), as long as it’s done in fellowship and charity, right?
What does breaking bread together mean to you? Scripture talks of the early church continuing to meet together and continuing with the breaking of bread. My understanding of breaking bread together is Communion that Jesus instituted as a memorial remembrance of Him and what He did.And we should all love Breaking Bread together. Scripture has the power to move us. It’s the Revelation of God speaking to us as a loving father!
I would think the RCC bases the Eucharist in scripture, however, is there a mention of the word anywhere? I am intrigued by your statement that it is harder for His Eucharist to be twisted. Not sure what you are proclaiming. Was the breaking of bread in the early church the exact same Eucharist you have today? Do you really see evidence in Scripture that it is supposed to be the summit and climax of the Christian experience? If you can address all these questions it may be helpful to me.Scripture can be manipulated, or twisted as Peter tells us. It’s harder for His Eucharist to be twisted. It is the Revelation of the Son nourishing us in Spirit and real food!
Please explain.If we place Scripture above His Eucharist, we do Him and ourselves wrong.
I don’t think I am anxious but I am confused somewhat!Sometimes it’s good to just read His written Word and not try to provide each other with so much commentary, right? Anxiety can get the better of us in many ways.
I think you are right on and have summed it up well.I think that there is much confusion over faith vs. works and I think that confusion is, in some cases, over semantics.
The way I understand it, true faith cannot be true faith if there isn’t any works flowing from this faith. Therefore, I believe that the original intent of “faith alone” is correct because faith will always be accompanied by works. If you fast forward to today, there folks who take the “faith alone” argument to an extreme place, which doesn’t represent the original intent behind “faith alone.”
At the the time shortly before the reformation, there certainly was strong shift of the pendulum toward works. I think many of the original, more conservative shall we say. reformers wanted to see that pendulum swing in a more balanced direction.
That is just my take on this issue.![]()