R
rbrownr
Guest
The Truth is Jesus is not God nor divine.So what is truth? If the “Text” is not divinely inspired, I guess Revelation, which contains the number “144,000” is unreliable?
The Truth is Jesus is not God nor divine.So what is truth? If the “Text” is not divinely inspired, I guess Revelation, which contains the number “144,000” is unreliable?
I am not familiar with JW doctrine–not a single JW has ever knocked on my door, and I can’t figure out why! Perhaps it’s because we have a statue of Mary out front?PR, JW’s view the WTBS as inspired and the final authority. They do view scripture as inspired per se, but only as far as it does not conflict with their doctrines. They tend to focus more on Paul’s epistles then they do the Gospels. Hence the reason for them to have produce the NWT version of the bible so it would support their beliefs, something that their bibles of the first half of the 20th century that they used certianly did not support.
Please answer the question asked by TMore, rbrownr.The Truth is Jesus is not God nor divine.
I’d be happy to tell you why I think many of those who come bravely to the door are not ones to be happy about.Dear friend w2lds2catholic: I am trying to gain an understanding of some of the nuances among Christians. I will admit that I don’t understand them very well. Do the psalms say “Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord”? I’m confused that you wouldn’t be happy to find devotees of Jesus at your door. Can you explain some of this to me?
Your friend
Sufjon
So by what authority do you make these claims? If you are going to go against 2000 years of Christian belief, what is your authority?The Bible per se cannot be divinely inspired.
It’s TEXT itself is clear proof of being not divinley inspired.
Nor you should claim that it is divinly inspired. Otherwise you will be guilty of attributing contradictions to God.
No, that’s the WTBS version of their understanding… Now, how do you know that Jesus even existed? Jesus is called “Mighty God”. The NWT calls him “a god”. So that’s not divine? The definition of divine below from The Free Dictionary online:The Truth is Jesus is not God nor divine.
I said earlier and I repeat :Please answer the question asked by TMore, rbrownr.
Do you not cite Revelation as part of your belief regarding 144,000 in heaven?
If so, then why do you believe that, if it’s not inspired?
Ok. Then how is it that you know anything about Jesus, about God’s revelation?I said earlier and I repeat :
The Bible per se cannot be divinely inspired. { which includes Revelation ]
It’s TEXT whether it is John’s non-synoptic Gospel’s or Book of Revelation’s ] itself is clear proof of being not divinley inspired.
Nor you should claim that it is divinly inspired. Otherwise you will be guilty of attributing contradictions to God.
rbrownr, I would be very, very careful about being here on the Catholic Answers forum.I said earlier and I repeat :
The Bible per se cannot be divinely inspired. { which includes Revelation ]
It’s TEXT whether it is John’s non-synoptic Gospel’s or Book of Revelation’s ] itself is clear proof of being not divinley inspired.
Nor you should claim that it is divinly inspired. Otherwise you will be guilty of attributing contradictions to God.
I’ll ask you again where does your authority for your beliefs come from? Who, and when did they establish this claim that contradicts 2000 years of Christian history?I said earlier and I repeat :
The Bible per se cannot be divinely inspired. { which includes Revelation ]
It’s TEXT whether it is John’s non-synoptic Gospel’s or Book of Revelation’s ] itself is clear proof of being not divinley inspired.
Nor you should claim that it is divinly inspired. Otherwise you will be guilty of attributing contradictions to God.
Good question/quest.Ok. Then how is it that you know anything about Jesus, about God’s revelation?
How do you know if Jesus was a man or a woman? Who told you? Do you know who his mother was? How do you know?
Where do you get your info/data? And how did that data get here?
I agree with your point, but you are ignoring the major point every other catholic is here.I’ll ask you again where does your authority for your beliefs come from? Who, and when did they establish this claim that contradicts 2000 years of Christian history?
I don’t understand your question, what race are you talking about?I agree with your point, but you are ignoring the major point every other catholic is here.
Are they preying on a particular race?
Maybe reading the thread title and the original post would help you understand.I don’t understand your question, what race are you talking about?
No, they are preying on anybody. They probably were given some Spanish material and they were trying to deposit them in the right households.Maybe reading the thread title and the original post would help you understand.
There is nothing in the original post to lead me to conclude they were preying on anybody.No, they are preying on anybody. They probably were given some Spanish material and they were trying to deposit them in the right households.
Please produce this “Q Document”Before we get to this point, you need to know the actual soruces of NT’s TEXT that has reached to us through ‘Q Document’.
According to who? Who says that is is an unknown?John 1:1-3 is mistranslated. Btwy, these are not Jesus’ words. So these words of a certain unknown “John”, has nothing to do with “Divinity” in question.