Kavanaugh Drama Risks Driving Moderates, Women Away From GOP

[Metis1]

what’s with your labels?

I didn’t use any such labels against Kavanaugh, so there’s no sense for me to go any further when one “bears false witness” as you have done. As I repeatedly posted, I don’t have a clue whether Kavanaugh is guilty of anything, and therefore i is not I who is afraid of an investigation. .

 

[JimG]

But neither does the constitution state a right to abortion on demand.

Of course it doesn’t. R v W made no sense from a constitutional perspective. My only point was that Scalia would not go outside the constitution to define personhood if it came to that, even though it might make sense from our knowledge of embryology.

 

[Annie]

And if he didn’t do it?

 

[Ridgerunner]

If he did it, the Dems don’t want him on the Court. If he didn’t do it, the Dems don’t want him on the Court.

 

[ProVobis]

If he doesn’t make it to the court the Republicans will no doubt be fired up.

 

[dvdjs]

And if he didn’t do it?

Then we are talking about something different that I was discussing with the other poster.

There is not requirement for a recognition of wrongful behavior, and an effort to make amends for actions that you did not commit.

 

[Theo520]

I didn’t use any such labels against Kavanaugh, so there’s no sense for me to go any further when one “bears false witness” as you have done. As I repeatedly posted, I don’t have a clue whether Kavanaugh is guilty of anything, and therefore i is not I who is afraid of an investigation

“sexual assaulter” is definitely a LABEL.
Where have I born false witness? I just think you are deflecting.

 

[Edmundus1581]

dvdjs:

Why are people so interested in sending a message to young boys that assault while shy of 18 years should be without consequences?

No one is saying without consequences. The consequences should have been applied 36 years ago when they mattered. If the person has lived a stellar life since, what consequences do you think remain to be executed and for what reason?

Exactly.

“When they mattered”

And, also, when memories and evidence were fresh and the accused was able to acquit themselves, if innocent. (Rather than being tarred with “unproven” charges).

 

[FirstFiveEighth]

I actually don’t think it is primarily about Roe or abortion. That has definitely come into play as the senator from Maine or wherever is being threatened with a withdrawal of support if she doesn’t vote against Kavanaugh. But I think it is primarily about the Democrats trying to get payback for their Merrick Garland pick not receiving a hearing and therefore forcing the confirmation hearing to move after the midterm elections, playing to their base, and hoping for a more favorable slate after the elections. Of course Merrick Garland simply didn’t get a hearing. They are trying to destroy Kavanaugh for the rest of his life for having the audacity to be nominated by Trump in an election year.

I personally would not be opposed at this point to digging up every piece of dirt on every obstructing democrat senator and dropping it 2-3 days before their election. No need to verify them for truth, just as long as it sounds moderately credible.

 

[HarryStotle]

Why are people so interested in sending a message to young boys that assault while shy of 18 years should be without consequences?

A more serious question is why people (your people) are so interested in sending the message to the young generally, that what really counts is the court of public opinion rather than the legitimate judicial process and the presumption of innocence?

My guess is so that character assassination can continue to be used as a tactic by the left to intimidate and stifle those who don’t buy into the progressive agenda.

Here, Ms Dazie is yours to defend, if you have a mind to…
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018...augh-presumption-innocence-were-not-court-law

Are you certain you want people like these making laws and running the country?

Careful what you wish for. Or are lynch mobs a positive thing as far as you are concerned?

 

[Theo520]

I personally would not be opposed at this point to digging up every piece of dirt on every obstructing democrat senator and dropping it 2-3 days before their election. No need to verify them for truth, just as long as it sounds moderately credible.

A pointless exercise without media support.

Remember Diane Feinstein had a Chinese spy working for decades in her inner circle. Where has been the media follow up on that bomb shell?

 

[FirstFiveEighth]

Well Diane Feinstein is a champion of the People’s Republ…I mean the people, and deserves a pass.

 

[Metis1]

“sexual assaulter” is definitely a LABEL.
Where have I born false witness?

Because I did not use nor imply that against Kavanaugh as it was a hypothetical.

 

[Theo520]

Because I did not use nor imply that against Kavanaugh as it was a hypothetical.

Never said you did, but your hypothetical assumed it as a fact and frankly as a pattern of behavior, something different than where we are at with this discussion.

 

[dvdjs]

A more serious question is why people (your people) are so interested in sending the message to the young generally, that what really counts is the court of public opinion rather than the legitimate judicial process and the presumption of innocence?

I think that that message is also a bad one.

 

[grotto]

Not to worry, its not true!

 

[grotto]

Crickets - that’s all anyone hears about the Chinese spy and there is lots of documentation to back that up. I am not going to provide links and research for anyone that continually asks for it. Just saying.

 

[Kmcicco2000]

So you consider Bloomberg bias but you don’t consider Rush bias? Wow! No words. Just wow.

 

[Theo520]

Crickets - that’s all anyone hears about the Chinese spy and there is lots of documentation to back that up. I am not going to provide links and research for anyone that continually asks for it. Just saying.

Can you imagine the firestorm if she was GOP? And all the areas of possible collusion would be raked up again and again. Her husband was a big investor in China but Dems are concerned someone might stay at a Trump hotel?

And then there is this bit of a confession

Feinstein wouldn’t comment on the spy but her office [told CBS] that none of the staffers in San Francisco have ever had security clearances.

 

[HarryStotle]

HarryStotle:

A more serious question is why people (your people) are so interested in sending the message to the young generally, that what really counts is the court of public opinion rather than the legitimate judicial process and the presumption of innocence?

I think that that message is also a bad one.

Thank you.