D
dvdjs
Guest
The supporting facts are present in this thread.No facts support your claim.
BTW, are you actually unaware of hte the difference between what I have said, and what you have said that I have said?
The supporting facts are present in this thread.No facts support your claim.
There are no facts to support your claim. I have posted your quote, are you unaware of what you have said? I have not said anything differently than what you have posted as I directly quoted you.The supporting facts are present in this thread.
BTW, are you actually unaware of hte the difference between what I have said, and what you have said that I have said?
Your paraphrase of me in post#302 is wrong. What you have quoted is correct. And some of the supporting tweets are in the thread from the get-go.I have not said anything differently than what you have posted as I directly quoted you.
Post 302:Your paraphrase of me in post#302 is wrong. What you have quoted is correct. And some of the supporting tweets are in the thread from the get-go.
If you want the accurate post number, please clink on the “share a link to this post” icon.Post 302:
You stated Post 302, I quoted post 302.If you want the accurate post number, please clink on the “share a link to this post” icon.
You quoted post #314,You stated Post 302, I quoted post 302.
Yes, one of them was.None of the people killed, as far as I know, were convicted terrorists,
None of the people killed, as far as I know, were convicted terrorists
Your problem is a fluid definition of words. The relevant meaning of aggression in this case is this one: “the action or an act of attacking without provocation.” You make no distinction between acts of aggression and the response to those acts. There’s really a significant difference.By your statement, Iran should respond to our aggression with more aggression because to do otherwise would be ineffective.
Actually, I don’t believe in your means of dealing with these issues, but yes, it is my choice (so to speak) because this is a practical issue about which we are free to make our own decisions.Okay, you do not believe in other means of dealing with these issues other than war. This goes against the CCC, but that’s your choice.
There has been plenty of provocation from both sides. Arguably,the US did an act of provocation by invading Iraq in the first place.“the action or an act of attacking without provocation.”
My means of dealing with the issues is to look at what is charitable, what brings about the Kingdom, and what shows God’s mercy. I believe in doing unto others as I would have them do unto me. I believe in forgiveness and reconciliation.Actually, I don’t believe in your means of dealing with these issues
Well, if Trump was trying to start a war with Iran he clearly failed. Iran fired about 15 missiles at a US base in Iraq, but fortunately warned Iraq first, who of course warned us. We took steps to ensure that our forces were not injured, and it appears that Iran did the same thing: some missiles were duds, some missed completely, and others did minimal damage to structures. No one was hurt.You are good DVDJS, Trump trying to start a war for his reelection. Very clever analysis.
You may have a point.What an incompetent president -
Interesting poll.
I was thinking the same thing about the downed plane. They knew right away there were no Americans on that flight, probably before it took off.We took steps to ensure that our forces were not injured, and it appears that Iran did the same thing:
I have no idea at all why the Iranians shot that plane down. Based on their (show) response to Soleimani’s elimination, however, it appears that they will be more circumspect in the future about what they do that endangers Americans.I was thinking the same thing about the downed plane. They knew right away there were no Americans on that flight, probably before it took off.
A warning would be my guess. It would have been a different story had there been a single American on board that flight.I have no idea at all why the Iranians shot that plane down.
It happened to the MH17 years ago, maybe it was 2014. At the least, the missile being looked at is probably a Russian missile.A Ukrainian official said Thursday the country is considering a Russian missile strike as one of several possible causes for a Ukrainian passenger plane crash that happened shortly after the flight took off from Tehran’s international airport early Wednesday morning.
He wasn’t trying to start a war. That shows how competent he is.Victoria33:![]()
Well, if Trump was trying to start a war with Iran he clearly failed. Iran fired about 15 missiles at a US base in Iraq, but fortunately warned Iraq first, who of course warned us. We took steps to ensure that our forces were not injured, and it appears that Iran did the same thing: some missiles were duds, some missed completely, and others did minimal damage to structures. No one was hurt.You are good DVDJS, Trump trying to start a war for his reelection. Very clever analysis.
What an incompetent president - can’t even start a war, unlike his predecessors.