In the Biblical passage you quote one might note that ***Christ did not eat ***the fish.
Failure to mention if he ate the fish or not is not conclusive evidence that he did either.
Wow.All you do is try to provoke as shown by your previous posts. You do not participate in discussions.
Such a strong response…
One would think that I hit upon a nerve. Sorry, but the hole in the logic was too big to ignore. I was unaware that pointing it out qualified as provocation and not actual discussion.
Pray tell, are meaningful contributions to the discussion limited to those that support these tremendous leaps in non-logic?