Kneeling for Communion is NOT disobedient

  • Thread starter Thread starter GoLatin
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
GoLatin:
Here is a link to a question that Father Gantley answered yesterday on the EWTN Q&A Forums:

ewtn.com/vexperts/showresult.asp?RecNum=455417&Forums=0&Experts=0&Days=1&Author=&Keyword=&pgnu=1&groupnum=0&record_bookmark=7&ORDER_BY_TXT=ORDER+BY+ReplyDate+DESC&start_at=

You might need to paste the address into the address area on your browser.
Father Mark is our former parochial vicar. He’s great!
 
40.png
JKirkLVNV:
Father Mark is our former parochial vicar. He’s great!
So I assume that Father Gantley will let people kneel to receive Holy Communion from him.

What do you mean by “former parochial vicar”?
 
“Parochial vicar” is called an “associate pastor” in some parishes. It means another priest assigned to a parish besides the pastor who helps the pastor run the parish and is usually less-experienced and “in training.” The term “parochial vicar”, rather than “associate pastor”, is the correct term and the one used by canon law.
 
40.png
GoLatin:
So I assume that Father Gantley will let people kneel to receive Holy Communion from him.

What do you mean by “former parochial vicar”?
Well, I assume so, but it never happened during our masses. He was recently transfered to his own parish. “Parocial vicar” basically is an assisting priest.
 
Fr. Gantly says:

Print this out and send it to the bishop. This is from a letter from the Congregation for Divine Worship and Discipline of the Sacraments Prot. n. 47/03/L dated February 26, 2003: “… while this Congregation gave the recognitio to the norm desired by the Bishops Conference of your country that people stand for Holy Communion, this was done on the condition that communicants who choose to kneel are not be denied Holy Communion on thse grounds. Indeed, the faithful should not be imposed upon nor accused of disobedience and of acting illicitly when they kneel to receive Holy Communion.”

This, to me shows that people who argue that it is pastorally correct to follow the instructions of one’s pastor cannot be right on this because the Vatican says that such communicants cannot be imposed upon.

IMHO, the Bishop had a right to “catechize” you per the norm, but it should have taken place following Communion, and in no way are you bound to that. He is only suppose to instruct you on why the norm is what it is in the US. If your heart and conscience tells you to kneel, then you are still free to do so and may not be accused of disobedience.
 
All that’s necessary for people to be able to kneel for Communion is for the priest to instruct the faithful to leave a little room at the front of the line for those who wish to kneel. Then the old argument of tripping hazards will be negated.

Here is an article from This Rock: Is Genuflecting at Communion Disruptive?
catholic.com/thisrock/1999/9910fea5.asp
 
40.png
paramedicgirl:
All that’s necessary for people to be able to kneel for Communion is for the priest to instruct the faithful to leave a little room at the front of the line for those who wish to kneel. Then the old argument of tripping hazards will be negated.

Here is an article from This Rock: Is Genuflecting at Communion Disruptive?
catholic.com/thisrock/1999/9910fea5.asp
Or provide a kneeler, as in my parish.
 
Kneeling for holy communion is also not the normative position in the USA per the GIRM. If we choose to follow our egos and not the Church, it’s important enough that our pastors are required to address this issue “pastorally, by providing the faithful with proper catechesis on the reasons for this norm.”
 
40.png
paramedicgirl:
All that’s necessary for people to be able to kneel for Communion is for the priest to instruct the faithful to leave a little room at the front of the line for those who wish to kneel. Then the old argument of tripping hazards will be negated.

Here is an article from This Rock: Is Genuflecting at Communion Disruptive?
catholic.com/thisrock/1999/9910fea5.asp
Ah, but now here’s the other side…I agree with the assertion that it isn’t disobedient in the eyes of the Church, BUT…if the norm in the United States is standing, and the Holy See has approved the norm of the United States, why should accomodation be made for those who wish to kneel? Why should the priest instruct the faithful to leave a little room? I think if I were the priest, the first time you knelt, I’d “caution” you, then I would never say anything thereafter. I’d give you communion each and every time. Then, when someone DOES trip over you and injures themselves, I’d say,“I’m sorry, I’ve spoken with that person, but I cannot force him not to kneel. Perhaps you’d like to talk to them about how YOU felt falling on the floor.” And what will you do when someone trods on you? Sue the Church? I think that I’d protect the Church by announcing from the pulpit at every Mass for a week and publishing in the bulletin thereafter that standing is the norm and that you kneel at your own risk. Why should we make it easy for you to break from the norm? I don’t care if you do, it genuinely doesn’t make any difference to me one way or another. But why should we make special accomodations, in the face of the approval of the Holy See? They simply said you couldn’t be called disobedient, they never said you had to be helped.
 
Rome has spoken, let us not place ourselves above Her or impose things She has chosen not to impose.
 
40.png
fix:
Rome has spoken, let us not place ourselves above Her or impose things She has chosen not to impose.
Oh, I quite agree. She hasn’t chosen to impose accomodation, for example.
 
40.png
AltarMan:
Kneeling for holy communion is also not the normative position in the USA per the GIRM. If we choose to follow our egos and not the Church, it’s important enough that our pastors are required to address this issue “pastorally, by providing the faithful with proper catechesis on the reasons for this norm.”
First of all, they are to do that afterward, not at the time of reception.

Secondly, note they they can provide the reasons for the norm, but they are not empowered for mandate a position for any subsequent receptions of the Sacrament.
 
40.png
AltarMan:
the reasons for this norm."
I’ve long wondered about the “reasons for this norm” ? Is it because they’ve ripped out the communion rails so it becomes “uncomfortable” to receive kneeling? Is it to speed things up, so the communicant can receive under both species without it taking all day to distribute communion? It it because that’s what the bishops decided and get with the program or else?

I’m not clear on whether the “catechesis on the norm” was part of the Vatican letter or a U.S. bishops thing. The part of the letter quoted seems to say the bishops ought to get with the program…that they decided on the need to accommodate. After all, it is more reverent in terms of the language of gestures.

Also maybe the person behind the kneeling communicant has a responsibility to pay attention enough not to trip. Honestly, leaving a little more room seems like a no brainer, except that we often have EMHCs and priests distribution stations in the center in ouir church (and it’s not a cathedral or a basilica or particularly large). I’ll bet if most parishes limited them to the cases permitted under the guidelines, there would be more space for communicants to kneel if they wished to, without a bif tripping hazard.
 
40.png
JKirkLVNV:
Oh, I quite agree. She hasn’t chosen to impose accomodation, for example.
I was thinking of posters who claim to know the hearts of those who kneel and attribute their kneeling to ego.
 
Yesterday evening, I went to a Mass for the Feast of Our Lady of Guadalupe.

This particular Parish(all of the Masses are Novus Ordo) recently installed two kneelers up front:amen: (they are nailed to the floor, I checked), for those who wish to kneel to receive Holy Communion. I mentioned this to the Priest afterward, and he said that some people had told him that they wanted to kneel to receive Holy Communion, but found it difficult, because there wasn’t anything to hold on to. So Father put these kneelers up front.

During the distribution of Holy Communion, Father stood with the Consecrated Hosts behind one kneeler, and a lay person stood with more Consecrated Hosts behind the other kneeler. In addition, there also was the Deacon with one Chalice, and a lay person with another Chalice. These two people stood off to the side of each kneeler, but there were no kneelers in front of the people with the Chalices.

So in order to receive the Consecrated Host, at this Parish you must walk up to a kneeler, but you do NOT have to kneel. Father says that people there are not forced to kneel, but those who wish to kneel are provided with help to do so.
 
40.png
AltarMan:
Kneeling for holy communion is also not the normative position in the USA per the GIRM. If we choose to follow our egos and not the Church, it’s important enough that our pastors are required to address this issue “pastorally, by providing the faithful with proper catechesis on the reasons for this norm.”
OK I’ll bite. what exactly are the reasons for this norm? I’ve never seen a rationale for the practice except that the Bishops wanted it. And please don’t bring up the primitive church argument again. The primitive church had a lot of things we no longer do or would even consider doing.
 
Isn’t it reason enough that standing is the norm? People should, not must, do it for that reason alone, IMHO. There are lots of things in the GIRM folks are supposed to do and don’t do; likewise there are things not in the GIRM that they do in fact do. As to the former, often folks don’t bow in the Creed or strike their breasts in the Confiteor. As to the latter, people often hold hands, or assume the orans position, during the Our Father. I think we should do what’s in the GIRM, and no more, both in submission to Rome and to make visitors more comfortable - that they’ll know what to do. I don’t think any of these things are so egregious that anyone needs to be humiliated or instructed publicly - let alone denied communion over them. As I read the the response from Rome - that’s the tack she’s taken as well. Let’s just do what we know is proper.

I’ve got to admit, I find it humerous that the folks who kneel often seem to be the ones crying the loudest about the holding hands in the Our Father - and vice versa. Neither is specified in the GIRM. 🙂
 
40.png
fix:
I was thinking of posters who claim to know the hearts of those who kneel and attribute their kneeling to ego.
Quite right, my apologies. I would never presume to say I had “a mirror into another man’s soul.”
 
40.png
johnnykins:
I’ve got to admit, I find it humerous that the folks who kneel often seem to be the ones crying the loudest about the holding hands in the Our Father - and vice versa. Neither is specified in the GIRM. 🙂
Kneeling is an act of reverence. Holding hands during the Our Father is charismatic:( , and a really bad idea!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top