I’m a little surprised to see everyone so excited by this. They basically defended the phrase “under God” by arguing that the claim had no religious content and that it was simply a “patriotic” declaration. According to the majority, “the phrase ‘one Nation under God’ does not turn this patriotic exercise into a religious activity.”Praise the Lord! For this ruling anywhere we should be happy, but especially from the Ninth Circuit!! It is not often that sane rulings come from California.
Of course. This country was founded on a firm faith in God and therefore it is patriotic to define us as “One Country, under God”I’m a little surprised to see everyone so excited by this. They basically defended the phrase “under God” by arguing that the claim had no religious content and that it was simply a “patriotic” declaration. According to the majority, “the phrase ‘one Nation under God’ does not turn this patriotic exercise into a religious activity.”
IMHO, “one Nation under God” is a simple statement of truth. Whether people want to deem that truth as religious or political or patriotic, I’m just glad to see it acknowledged.I’m a little surprised to see everyone so excited by this. They basically defended the phrase “under God” by arguing that the claim had no religious content and that it was simply a “patriotic” declaration. According to the majority, “the phrase ‘one Nation under God’ does not turn this patriotic exercise into a religious activity.”