Korean War ending?

  • Thread starter Thread starter feed_me
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
When one speculates, one precedes with something like “I believe” “I thnk” or even “I speculate”

I am sure you have seen those before.

Point in case:
I suspect the cost of their venture is just too much of a drain. If the facility is destroyed, they’d have start fresh. People involved may also be pushing back after a major failure.
or
I actually think it had to do with that covert meeting between mike pompayo, maybe the deep state give nk and ultimatium and not a good one at that. But i do believe that nk might be deceptive in the long term
 
Last edited:
All martyrs of Korea, pray for us

 
When one speculates, one precedes with something like “I believe” “I thnk” or even “I speculate”

I am sure you have seen those before.

Point in case:
Sure, it’s better with a qualifier but you would still know I was speculating if I had left off ‘I suspect’ I’m just being more definitive in my opinion.
 
Last edited:
I suspect the cost of their venture is just too much of a drain. If the facility is destroyed, they’d have start fresh. People involved may also be pushing back after a major failure.
Only North Korea could create its own branch of geology.
 
What about the long-range missile capabilities which they’ve advanced?
 
Good point about Libya.

But I have serious thoughts about how well advanced North Korea’s nuclear program was in the first place.
 
A wondrous start. I spent a half hour this morning browsing all the videos and reading the joint communique the leaders issued.

But the devil is in the details, as they say. Is this real? I sure hope so. Or is Kim taking a few pages from his father’s playbook?

I will say this much: I’m sure Kim has a long term plan. It’s likely he briefed Xi on it during his trip to Beijing and returned with Xi’s approval. The Chinese have propped up the North Korean regime because they never wanted a unified Korea run by the South Koreans right on their border with the possibility of US troops setting up house by the Yalu River. On the other hand, it’s possible the Chinese have been pushing Kim to be more conciliatory as one of several paths to reducing tensions with the US.

Remember there was no definition of “complete denuclearization”. To the North Koreans, it might not mean what we think it ought to, for instance. Negotiations can founder on that alone.

I’ll do my best to hold my skepticism in check. For now.
 
North Korea noted that the USA annihilated a couple of hundred Russian mercenaries in February.
I have major, major problems with this article, starting with the fact that the nasty language supposedly spoken by the Russians in Syria is completely unlike the way the Russians use “colorful metaphors”. Completely different.

D
 
Last edited:
Good point about Libya.

But I have serious thoughts about how well advanced North Korea’s nuclear program was in the first place.
I agree. they could shoot missiles straight up in the air, as I recall. That’s very different than actually hitting a small target 1/3 way around the world, even if your rocket can travel the distance. Though a near hit is still pretty scary.given the payload.
 
trump get a nobel peace prize? surely you jest.

falls about laughing.

good one mate, what a sense of humour.
 
news reports here today say its not collapsed.

that collapse afakenewsathon is just not true.
 
Have you all checked the satellite photos?

They are publicly available.
 
Any move toward peace is a good move. Hopefully, it is not just words on a paper with no substance nor physical reality. One thing it won’t be is a signal to bring American troops home. Unfortunately, it is not the American way.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top