M
MonteRCMS
Guest
Which “this”?
- Status
R
Roseeurekacross
Guest
the did the mountain collapse or not thread.
but since this thread now, kim has invited everyone to said mountain.
stay tuned!
but since this thread now, kim has invited everyone to said mountain.
stay tuned!
F
feed_me
Guest
Didnt this happen before with disasterous results?
R
Ridgerunner
Guest
In some ways that’s true. But by the late 1980s, one could argue, the Soviet Union really wasn’t a nuclear threat to anyone, whereas Kim at least appears to have been headed in that direction.
R
ratio1
Guest
I think the nobels peace prize committee can give them a prize now before it happens.
Last edited:
T
Theo520
Guest
I’ve prayed that they stop that nasty habit.
They have a compulsion to be topical but instead just cheapen the significance of the prize
P
ProVobis
Guest
So at what point is it safe to say that peace has been accomplished and prizes can be awarded? Just asking, not challenging.
T
Theo520
Guest
Most Nobel prizes come years after the accomplishment,
not when the research or book is just published.
They give the work time to be digested and manifest an impact.
For a peace prize, a couple years to see some change would be judicious.
Last edited:
O
OneSheep
Guest
We can pray that Mr. Trump realizes that John Bolton is an extremist.
T
Theo520
Guest
Bolton is a neocon, which puts him mainstream for DC.
Only reason he’s being attacked is because he’s working for Trump
M
MonteRCMS
Guest
North Korea maintains at least two EMP warheads in orbit over the USA at all times.
Both North Korea and Iran have practiced launching rockets from tubby nondescript ships.
[Source: Dr. Peter Pry in “Blackout Wars”, page 44; pp 193ff. and elsewhere]
click here google you tube peter pry
North Korea has fielded teams of assassins:
North Korea has a history of assassination attempts on foreign soil
Since 2008, North Korea has been linked to at least six attempted hits, two of them successful, in South Korea, China and Malaysia.
www.nbcnews.com
Last edited:
I
Inisfallen
Guest
Not really. He’s been attacked as a war hawk and a distorter of intelligence to serve his own agenda for decades. And not just by Democrats.
T
Theo520
Guest
I already called him a neo-con, they are known hawks.
I was surprised Trump hired a neo-con for this position.
Last edited:
O
OneSheep
Guest
Among neocons, he is an extremist. His opposition to the U.N., his call for attacks on Iran, his support for the war on Iraq all say “I am a lobbyist for Benjamin Netanyahu”.
If we are so much in support of BT, why not just have him be our president too? It would be more honest. In fact, Rupert Murcoch is essentially our president, which means that we are already run by BT.
So much for “America First”.
T
Theo520
Guest
How’s he extreme for a neocon?
Face it, he got branded extreme when he endorsed Trump,
who incidentally isn’t a NeoCon.
Face it, he got branded extreme when he endorsed Trump,
who incidentally isn’t a NeoCon.
I
Inisfallen
Guest
You’re right about Trump not being a neocon. I’m not even sure he’s a conservative, as that term was understood before he came along. He certainly wasn’t the reincarnation of Barry Goldwater.
But Bolton was branded as extreme long before Trump came along.
T
Theo520
Guest
I repeat my question, how is he extreme for a neocon?
S
stinkcat_14
Guest
I think part of the problem is that when it comes to economic policies republicans are not conservative and Trump is to the left of most republicans on economic matters.
I
Inisfallen
Guest
OK, fair point. Among neocons (like Perle and Wolfowitz and the rest), he may not appear that extreme.
That doesn’t mean he isn’t extreme.
T
Theo520
Guest
I agree he’s a hawk,
He may do much to increase Trump’s support among the DC old guard who are also mostly neocons,
and ‘NeverTrumpers’
He may do much to increase Trump’s support among the DC old guard who are also mostly neocons,
and ‘NeverTrumpers’
- Status