Then Luke tells us:
23 When Jesus began his ministry he was about thirty years of age. He was the son, as was thought, of Joseph, the son of Heli,
24 the son of Matthat, the son of Levi, the son of Melchi, the son of Jannai, the son of Joseph, … … …
37 the son of Methuselah, the son of Enoch, the son of Jared, the son of Mahalaleel, the son of Cainan,
38 the son of Enos, the son of Seth, the son of Adam, the son of God. Luke 3
So what? I cannot see your point. Unless you prove that the phrase “Son of God” means the same when applied to Adam and Jesus, your reference to Jesus’ genealogy in Luke has no meaning.

Analyzer;4240271:
In this geneology of Jesus (which is different from Matthews’ though…you can see the whole of it, in your Bible), Adam is mentioned as 'the son of God"
and not “the creation of God”.
What a silly and fallacious argument! Islam teaches that Adam was the first messenger of Allah. Does this allegation mean that all messengers of Allah were directly created by God and not born of women like Adam???
Luke does not deny Adam’s creation when he refers to Adam as the Son of God in Jesus’ genealogy. He simply does so in order to highlight the similarity and contrast between Jesus and Adam. You have got so many things to learn indeed!
Then Matthew informs us that Jesus says:
Call no one on earth your father; you have but one Father in heaven. —Matthew 23:9
Now are you going to reject your Gospels as well by saying: Catholic Gospels too are unbelievable that resort to lies when everything was clear from the OT that Adam was created?
I am not going to reject the Bible, but your stupid comments derived from your too-clear ignorance of the Christian tenets.
Now let’s see how you deny/reject your own Gospels which clearly to you tells a blatant lie.
What we can see is actually how the Bible rejects your uncanny and faulty statements and presents you as an Islamic liar.