LA RE Conference - Closing Liturgy

  • Thread starter Thread starter franklinf
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
ChurchTorch said:
Yeah and the Cardinal has to authority to dispense with something like that for a specific liturgy despite what fr. z might claim. It may not be good that he allows it but he has the authority to do so.
Click to expand...
Source?

Oh, and do you retract your statement that no anti-Church teaching goes on at the LAREC? I believe you called it silly to suggest otherwise.
 
ChurchTorch said:
Yeah and the Cardinal has to authority to dispense with something like that for a specific liturgy despite what fr. z might claim. It may not be good that he allows it but he has the authority to do so.
Click to expand...
No, he does not, ChurchTorch. Please, again, read the documents before making any claims that you cannot substantiate.
  1. The Diocesan Bishop, who is to be regarded as the high priest of his flock, and from whom the life in Christ of the faithful under his care in a certain sense derives and upon whom it depends,148 must promote, regulate, and be vigilant over the liturgical life in his diocese. It is to him that in this Instruction is entrusted the regulating of the discipline of concelebration (cf. above, nos. 202, 374) and the establishing of norms regarding the function of serving the priest at the altar (cf. above, no. 107), the distribution of Holy Communion under both kinds (cf. above, no. 283), and the construction and ordering of churches (cf. above, no. 291). With him lies responsibility above all for fostering the spirit of the Sacred Liturgy in the priests, deacons, and faithful.
Click to expand...
It does not give the bishop, be he an bishop, archbishop or cardinal, carte blanche authority. The only one who has supreme authority is the Holy Father.
 
Ah, this liturgy again. A real P.O.S. alright. Give thanks that LA has Archbishop Gomez as Coadjutor. Mahony’s days are numbered.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top