Lack of Education is the Reason Catholicism in the US is Larger In Terms of Numbers

  • Thread starter Thread starter RevDrNorth
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
RevDrNorth said:
Here is a list of Episcopalian Colleges and Seminaries from a much longer aticle on the Episcopal Church in Wikipedia

Seminaries
Berkeley Divinity School at Yale, New Haven, Connecticut
Bexley Hall, Rochester, New York and Columbus, Ohio
The Church Divinity School of the Pacific, Berkeley, California
Episcopal Divinity School, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Episcopal Theological Seminary of the Southwest, Austin, Texas
The General Theological Seminary, New York City
Nashotah House, Nashotah, Wisconsin
Seabury-Western Theological Seminary, Evanston, Illinois
School of Theology at University of the South, Sewanee, Tennessee
Trinity Episcopal School for Ministry, Ambridge, Pennsylvania
Virginia Theological Seminary, Alexandria, Virginia

Colleges
Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson, New York
Clarkson College , Omaha, Nebraska
Columbia University, New York City (Columbia was once affiliated with the Episcopal Church but is now a non-sectarian institution)
Hobart and William Smith Colleges, Geneva, New York
Kenyon College, Gambier, Ohio
St. Augustine College, Chicago, Illinois
St. Augustine’s College, Raleigh, North Carolina
St. Paul’s College, Lawrenceville, Virginia
University of the South, Sewanee, Tennessee
Voorhees College, Denmark, South Carolina

North
Click to expand...
Thank you, RevDrNorth.
 
Sr_Sally said:
Sounds like a good read too.
Click to expand...
I looked up De Rosa on Amazon and the review for one of his books read:

*De Rosa ( Prayers for Pagans and Hypocrites ) is an angry Catholic. In the worst proselytizing tradition, this devil’s advocate overstates familiar arguments, bludgeoning the reader with his dossier against the Church. Among De Rosa’s tamer charges: Jesus renounced possessions, but his vicars celebrate high mass garbed in cloth of gold; the Church has never lifted strictures against usury, yet the Vatican operates a bank. De Rosa sweeps through Church history to parade popes who begat children, popes who fornicated on a grand scale, popes who married. Then in the second half of this polemic, he addresses Church teaching, conjoining the “immaculate conception” doctrine to decrees governing birth control, abortion, celibacy. The doctrine of papal infallibility is dealt with, as is Church anti-Semitism through the ages leading to the Holocaust silence of Pius XII, the “one man in the world whose witness Hitler feared.” And in wrapping up his catalog of “the sins of the papacy,” De Rosa virtually dismisses internal reform: “It is not Catholics but other Christians who chiefly can make the papacy what it ought to be.”
Copyright 1988 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

From Library Journal
In his history of the papacy, former Jesuit De Rosa aims to undermine belief in papal infallibility. Although he claims to be a friend of the Catholic Church, and does at times express admiration for the holiness of many of the Popes, his book is so heavily weighted with information on the corruption of the Papacy that it would be hard for any reader to see any good in the office. The book cannot be faulted historically or stylistically, though most of the informationincluding the most sordidcan be found in the standard Roman Catholic sources. Patrick Grainfeld’s The Limits of the Papacy (Crossroad, 1987) offers a more balanced view of the expansion of papal power. Augustine J. Curley, Newark Abbey, N.J.
Copyright 1988 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title*
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top