Late-Term Abortionist's Patient Drops Bombshell Testimony

  • Thread starter Thread starter Philothea53
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
P

Philothea53

Guest
…Of Illegal, Coerced Abortion

TOPEKA, Kansas, September 10, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A former patient of abortionist George R. Tiller gave jaw-dropping testimony before a joint interim legislative committee Friday, telling the detailed story of her late-term abortion experience that, as described, violated the Kansas ban on such abortions at nearly every turn.

lifesite.net/ldn/2007/sep/07091001.html
 
What a sad, sad story. I just cannot fathom the idea of two people so adamant and determined to make sure their own grandchild is killed…😦

It says in the article that an employee in the clinic reminded this woman that “her life would be over and she’d never be able to go to college”. This line just infuriates me! Parents attend college ALL THE TIME, and often do better than their younger fellow students.

I had my first baby at 20, two years older than the woman in this story. My life certainly wasn’t over. Yea, it sure was hard, but my goodness, looking back over the last 10 years, the birth of my son is when life really began for me!

Why can’t people get that. :mad:
 
And what’s espeically sad is that it has come to light recently that women who abort a first pregnancy at age 18 or younger run a higher risk of breast cancer than women who abort in their 20’s. So these parents who coerce their teen-age daughters into abortion are not only killing their own grandchild, setting their daughter up for pain and suffereing- but subjecting her to a much higher risk of breast cancer later on down the line.
 
And what’s espeically sad is that it has come to light recently that women who abort a first pregnancy at age 18 or younger run a higher risk of breast cancer than women who abort in their 20’s. So these parents who coerce their teen-age daughters into abortion are not only killing their own grandchild, setting their daughter up for pain and suffereing- but subjecting her to a much higher risk of breast cancer later on down the line.
Not only are they subjecting their child to an increased risk of breast cancer, but also severe emotional/mental problems. I just can’t imagine forcing my teen to do something that could cause them so much pain down the road. Oh, if these parents only knew and understood the reality of post-abortive problems. 😦
 
This is why there should be a law allowing girls who were aborted as minors to sue the abortionist when they reach majority.
 
…Of Illegal, Coerced Abortion

TOPEKA, Kansas, September 10, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A former patient of abortionist George R. Tiller gave jaw-dropping testimony before a joint interim legislative committee Friday, telling the detailed story of her late-term abortion experience that, as described, violated the Kansas ban on such abortions at nearly every turn.

lifesite.net/ldn/2007/sep/07091001.html
Or is a major supporter of the Democrat party. I suspect he is very disappointed this trial went forward being he used his money and influence to defeat the Republican Attorney General that originally had charged him. Unfortunately he is being tried only for a misdemeanor
 
Or is a major supporter of the Democrat party. I suspect he is very disappointed this trial went forward being he used his money and influence to defeat the Republican Attorney General that originally had charged him. Unfortunately he is being tried only for a misdemeanor
Will that be adequate to revoke his license to practice medicine?
 
The abortion kills the child, not the mother.
Sorry, vern, I know it’s just a matter of semantics, but since you sound intelligent from your other posts, I’m assuming you know what you’re talking about, so I’m honestly trying to get my own head straight.

I’ve always used the term “aborted” to refer to the child, as in “She was pregnant, but she chose to have the baby aborted.” The would-be mother had an abortion, and the baby was aborted.

Is this incorrect?
 
Michelle was taken to a room with an ultrasound machine. She was prevented from seeing the viewing screen by the clinic worker who did her ultrasound.
If you can’t see it, it’s not really a baby, is it?
 
Sorry, vern, I know it’s just a matter of semantics, but since you sound intelligent from your other posts, I’m assuming you know what you’re talking about, so I’m honestly trying to get my own head straight.

I’ve always used the term “aborted” to refer to the child, as in “She was pregnant, but she chose to have the baby aborted.” The would-be mother had an abortion, and the baby was aborted.

Is this incorrect?
Well, let’s see:
American Heritage Dictionary - Cite This Source a·bort (ə-bôrt’) Pronunciation Key
v. a·bort·ed, a·bort·ing, a·borts
To give birth prematurely or before term; miscarry.
To cease growth before full development or maturation.
To terminate an operation or procedure, as with a project, missile, airplane, or space vehicle, before completion.
To cause to terminate (a pregnancy) prematurely, especially before the fetus is viable.
To cause the expulsion of (an embryo or fetus) before it is viable.
To give premature birth to (an embryo or fetus).
To interfere with the development of; conclude prematurely: abort plans for a corporate takeover.
To terminate before completion: abort a trip because of illness; abort a takeoff.
To stop the progress of (a disease, for example).
It looks like you’re right.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top