I
Irishmom2
Guest
Wow. That’s not going to happen, thank God.. If the Baby Boomer population were to pass suddenly,
Wow. That’s not going to happen, thank God.. If the Baby Boomer population were to pass suddenly,
Yes, but it’s better to prepare than to send all these untrained priests scrambling for training in the EF, as if the unpopularity of the OF among new generations was “unforeseen” by Church leadership.Something tells me that the training in the EF will be brief. Very brief.
No, but that generation is getting awfully old at this point, sorry to say. We can’t expect that large chunk of the Catholic population to be replaced in 30 years from now, given the lack of converts and growing number of lapsed Catholics…Wow. That’s not going to happen, thank God.
Latin Mass was never introduced into Asia by the missionaries. When they arrived in China in the early 17th century, it was adapted to the vernacular.Could the church ever bring back full Latin mass, I think it was something amazing about it, how if I was to go to mass in America, Italy or Japan I’d be able to understand it. It was universal.
I wouldn’t worry too much though. I don’t believe there’ll ever be a mass desire for the medieval form of the Mass. There are even very prominent traditionalist Priests noticing worrying trends coming from the culture around it. Perhaps when the extremists quiet down a genuine reform of the reform could happen in a spirit of genuine holy communion.Comments like this (and threads like this) are very saddening to me. I’m not a boomer - not even close - but to propose they’re the only ones who prefer the OF and in a few years that form will be a thing of the past leaves people like me with no spiritual home in the future. The two forms should coexist; it’s no more right to supplant the OF with the EF than the reverse ever was.
Yes I’ve always included the extremists on both ends in that. In fact I’ve noticed a unique phenomenon that extremists who are supposedly polar opposites, have more in common with each other than they do with their moderate fellows.The extremists on BOTH sides, both of whom are equally at fault.
Vatican 1 had two main objectives; the first being the authority of the Pope; the second being, in light of the authority of the Pope, waht was (is) the au;thority and role of the bishops.Or how about a resumption of Vatican I?
It’s known as a horseshoe. At the far ends, extreme people at opposite ends come back together.stpurl:![]()
Yes I’ve always included the extremists on both ends in that. In fact I’ve noticed a unique phenomenon that extremists who are supposedly polar opposites, have more in common with each other than they do with their moderate fellows.The extremists on BOTH sides, both of whom are equally at fault.
How about that! I looked up horseshoe theory and I never knew it already existed!Emeraldlady:![]()
It’s known as a horseshoe. At the far ends, extreme people at opposite ends come together to some extent.stpurl:![]()
Yes I’ve always included the extremists on both ends in that. In fact I’ve noticed a unique phenomenon that extremists who are supposedly polar opposites, have more in common with each other than they do with their moderate fellows.The extremists on BOTH sides, both of whom are equally at fault.
That isn’t a very charitable remark. Also, you grossly overestimate the number of people well under boomer age who prefer Mass in the vernacular and intend to continue going to Mass. I attend several big parishes where there are a huge number of Mass attendees younger than boomer, and they clearly like the OF and are not showing signs of dropping out of Mass-going any time soon.If the Baby Boomer population were to pass suddenly, the number of parishioners attending weekly Sunday Mass at my OF parish would drop by 70%, whereas with the EF Parish not too far from where I live, it would drop by maybe 15% - young, traditional Catholics dominate that parish.