G
gomer_tree
Guest
I have great respect for those I know who prefer the TLM. I can appreciate and understand the preference with regard to reverence and sacredness.Well, just a reminder, the Pope’s latest writing doesn’t say we HAVE to abandon the new for the old. If you prefer the Novus Ordo, by all means, attend.
As far as understanding what is happening, I have followed the Latin Mass in the Missal enough times that I practically have it all memorized anyway.
Neither Mass, unfortunatly, will get the Infamous ‘CE’ Catholics (Christmas / Easter attendance only) to come back.
OVERALL, I have noticed that the old Latic Rite is usually much more reverently done. As far as you all responding and saying things like “HOW DARE YOU, MY PRIEST IS A SAINT AND SAYS THE NOVUS ORDO MASS PERFECTALLY!!11!!!” Well, good for you and your community. My experience is a little different. For example, I have never seen a guy dressed up in a John The Baptist rush out from Sacristy singing in the middle of the sermon at a Traditional Rite Mass. I guess that little piece of theatre was suppsed to impress or something.
Where I lose appreciation is an attitude that tends to surface that ends up being judging the Novus Ordo Mass as somehow lacking. It is true that there have been many abuses of the Novus Ordo Mass. But that is the fault of the abusers. Christ is truly present in the Norvus Ordo. Rome accepts it as the norm. Those things should give us all pause when criticizing it as somehow beneath us.
I prefer the Norvus Ordo Mass. I happen to agree that a well done Latin Mass is like heaven on earth. This can be accomplished in a beautiful church with a choir, good musicians, and a grand Pipe organ. But for all the criticism of music in the Norvus Ordo Mass (generally a broad statement as if to say all churches everywhere saying the Mass are equally infected), I have also attended some painful and quite non-uplifting (musically, anyway) Masses where Gregorian chant has been attempted. It made me long for a well strummed guitar…
The