C
Cruciferi
Guest
Genetics? 
Aaahhh. Human trafficking isn’t legal in Western civilizations, as far as I am aware. In the Middle East it certainly is, however.I was referring to your statement here![]()
No, do you?Did you miss the war in the Balkans?
So, you realize that your comment about the West is in error.No, do you?
I don’t think it is. Can you please clearly state what it is about the Balkan Wars that you think makes my comment erroneous?So, you realize that your comment about the West is in error.
Can you please clearly state what it is about the Balkan Wars that you think makes my comment erroneous?
OTOH, we have continued to see ethnic genocides despite the cries of “never again!” after the Holocaust.
That is also true, though not in any of the Western nations. I blame that on a lack of Western values based on a Judeo-Christian worldview, honestly.
These acts were adjudicated to be acts of genocide, and were undertaken people form a nations steeped in Judaeo-Christian values. I think taht your comment has fallen notwithstanding your effort to prop it up with special pleading.Thoughts?
One of them was, according to the Wikipedia article you quoted.These acts were adjudicated to be acts of genocide
No, they were undertaken by a military junta that had existed for around 3 years, again according to what you cited.and were undertaken people form a nations steeped in Judaeo-Christian values.
I think your tone is strangely confrontational, but I am confident in my assessment based on the evidence.I think taht your comment has fallen notwithstanding your effort to prop it up with special pleading.
Yes. …Yes—the Bosnian genocide, for instance.
I think that your assessment of my tone is incorrect. i am certain that comments on tone violate forum guidelines.I think your tone is strangely confrontational, but I am confident in my assessment based on the evidence.
Fair enough, I have no reason to believe you.I think that your assessment of my tone is incorrect.
It was just an observation. I’ll hope you believe me when I say it wasn’t a personal attack, but do what you think is best.i am certain that comments on tone violate forum guidelines.
…I’ve never heard of a military junta that was based on Judeo-Christian principles, have you?If you are willing to dismiss these people are somehow outliers who are not part of their nation’s Judaeo-Christian tradition,
Would you not argue that those two people and their ideologies were drastically, if not diametrically opposed to the traditions of the countries that they essentially overthrew?why not Pol Pot and his countries Buddhist tradition. Why not Mao and his country’s Confucian tradition.
I disagree, based solely on the numbers and the fact that your examples are not, in fact, Judeo-Christian at all.The idea that the Judaeo-Christian tradition affords some insulation genocide or democide has little evidence to support it.
If the explanations are good ones that disprove the counter-evidence, what’s the problem? And, is time-frame not important to you?It relies on a selected time frame and requires explaining away counter evidence.
See forum FAQ:t was just an observation.
Please avoid:
Name-calling
Ad hominem attacks
Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
Knee-jerk contradiction
Fiar enough. The problem, is that the explanations are not good but a case of the “no true Scotsman” fallacy.If the explanations are good ones that disprove the counter-evidence
Noted, thank you.See forum FAQ:
I don’t think they are, though. A military junta less than three years old is not a Judeo-Christian society by its very definition. It’s a separation from one, if the country from which the military came was a Judeo-Christian one in the first place.The problem, is that the explanations are not good but a case of the “no true Scotsman” fallacy.
Please recall:If the junta had kept those values, they wouldn’t have needed to separate at all
OTOH, we have continued to see ethnic genocides despite the cries of “never again!” after the Holocaust.
Your comment was about Western nations and the values there.That is also true, though not in any of the Western nations. I blame that on a lack of Western values based on a Judeo-Christian worldview, honestly.
I suspect we might be splitting hairs a little bit, but I can accept that my statement is technically incorrect in the geographical sense. I’m not sure it disproves the larger point that I was trying to make about Judeo-Christian values being a bulwark against such things though. I think the scarcity of Western nations “housing” such crises proves that point.Your comment was about Western nations and the values there.
Serbia is a Western nation with Western values.
The fact that those perpetrating the genocide had evidently abandoned those values is true, even tautological. But they are still truly of a Western nation and the values there Western and Judaeo-Christian.
I like to hope that it is, just as I like to hope that similar values in other religious systems also serve as a bulwark. The evidence is that none are perfect bulwarks. I think, moreover, that it is very difficult to make a sound argument that one is better in this regard than another.I’m not sure it disproves the larger point that I was trying to make about Judeo-Christian values being a bulwark against such things though.
Perfection is certainly something we’ll never find here on earth.I like to hope that it is, just as I like to hope that similar values in other religious systems also serve as a bulwark. The evidence is that none are perfect bulwarks.
I’d disagree, though I’d need time to look at instances of things like recent genocide and current legal slavery in order to know for sure. I deeply suspect that one will find more of these in countries and locations that are not based on Western, Judeo-Christian values. I certainly think that those kinds of societies are demonstrably better than others in most regards.I think, moreover, that it is very difficult to make a sound argument that one is better in this regard than another.
Take no offense, but I’m sure glad I wasn’t born 80 years earlier. I would almost certainly not have survived childhood. Had what was then called “Scarlatina” with a temp that spiked at 107. But for penicillin, I’m fairly confident I would not have made it.especially to the girls. i pictured myself on the prairie with her and since i grew up in Kansas i would daydream about what life was like back then. i always felt i was born in the wrong point in history - instead of 1952, i should have been born 80 years earlier!