Laura Ingalls Wilder's name pulled from library award over 'stereotypical

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cruciferi
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Where my grandparents live, the whole area is named after an Indian Chief and the local tribe (back when DeSoto came through). The town, the river, the next town, etc. Many of the local companies are named similarly and use that motif. Warrior Tractor, etc. None of it is pejorative. I think it gives a lot of character and history to the area and it would be sad to see it go away- not that I expect it to, its pretty ingrained.
 
I am actually reading a very good book right now that touches on the rise of communism in Yugoslavia. It basically came down to the fact that the communist Partisans were the only ones who were really willing to fight back against the Nazis and so won the respect of the population.

The guerrilla fighters that sprang out of the army after German occupation, the Chetniks, originally resisted but were ultimately unwilling to continue fighting the Germans in the face of the Germans liquidating entire villages in retribution. They had elected to play the long game of waiting for an allied victory. Meanwhile, they saw the communist partisans as a threat to the legitimate government and the monarchy, so they began fighting the Partisans instead of the Germans. In classic, “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” style, this eventually led to the Chetniks giving info on the Partisans to the Germans, coordinating attacks with the Germans, and basic outright collaboration. Some of these guys received the Iron Cross from the Nazis.

As such, the patriotic Yugoslav threw their lot in with the Partisans. They were the only ones actually going after the Germans. Chetniks switched sides, and even many clergy joined the Partisan movement. The Partisan leadership of course made sure to educate their new arrivals in the communist creed. Wen the Nazis were finally overthrown, it was the communist Partisans who had the trust of the people and not the King or the former government (which had largely capitulated on invasion). And so Tito took power of communist Yugoslavia.
 
Last edited:
I am actually reading a very good book right now that touches on the rise of communism in Yugoslavia.
I would recommend, for additonal perspective, going back further into the post-WWI era, and even into the Hapsburg era. Dividing lines and grievances had roots that has been developed well before the Nazis.
 
Well yeah grievances in the Balkans go back hundred of years. One guy kicks out the Ottomans to become a King, then another guy murders that guy to become the next king, he gets murdered by the son of the previous king, etc etc. Anyways I just though the history was interesting.
 
Last edited:
They were indeed, and moved to a new location when they discovered their error.
 
They were indeed, and moved to a new location when they discovered their error.
There went in seeking an advantage, expecting the US to drive the Indians west.
When white settlers come into a country, the Indians have to move on. The government is going to move these Indians farther west any time now. That’s why we’re here, Laura. White people are going to settle all this country, and we get the best land because we get here first and take our pick. Now do you understand? - Pa

Te historian quoted the Smithsonian article indicated that “… they moved on after federal troops threatened to remove them and other illegal settlers from Osage land…”
 
This will be my last comment. The fact that the land was stolen from those who were there before you doesn’t mean that you’re disqualified to live there. But you must treat fairly the people who the land was stolen from. That means treat American Indians fairly as all other ethnicities, no better and no worse than any other group.
While I differ with President Trump to a great extent on the immigration topic such as separate families-I think the argument ‘nobody is illegal on stolen land’ is a poor argument because we should still have immigration laws.

The land on which the Sioux lived on was stolen from other Indian tribes, but usually don’t hear that Sioux or other Indian tribes did not have a right to fight for their land just because they stole land from other Indian tribes. 🇺🇸 has a right to enforce immigration laws and have borders, though the land was stolen from others as long as they don’t do anything cruel and bad such as separate families or deny care for those here.

If you look @ the Arab-Israeli dispute, Israel was created by stealing land from others who were there before them. But usually don’t hear (except by some) that Jews don’t have a right to live there because it was stolen from others especially the Palestinians. It is important that the Jewish people who live there must treat the people who Israel stole the land from fairly. 😐

Before the Whites stole the territory, Native Americans got their lands by wars, which in some cases, involved killing the neighboring tribes men and kidnapping the women and girls as wives. In these cases, the defeated tribe didn’t get a reservation or even a bad peace treaty. The men are killed, most boys are killed (unless taken as slaves) and the women and girls are kidnapped as wives.

Now yes, the Indian reservations where Whites take the best lands and treaties broken, is arrogant, esp. when 1 wants gold, silver, etc. But here, you are alive and you or descendants have a chance. An American Indian can get married, raise family and they or descendants have a chance to change things for better because you’re alive. Indian reservations was often arrogance, but a case can be made that it’s the lesser of the 2 bads because here you are @least alive and have a chance.

An Indian war, where 1 Indian tribe kills another tribe, takes women and girls as wives, the men being killed unless the boy becomes a slave is worse because here the defeated tribe doesn’t get a treaty & thus as the men killed don’t get to marry and raise a family, you have no chance.Treatment of American Indians was arrogant only that potentially, some American Indian tribes would’ve hypothetically have done the same thing if they had the better weapons and military strategies.

With wars, including stealing land, you must have courage to fight for your greed. Axis dictators charisma indoctrinated millions of German soldiers, Japanese and Italians to fight and die for their leaders. There have been other ideology wars such as Korean War, Vietnam War, etc.
 
Last edited:
Where my grandparents live, the whole area is named after an Indian Chief and the local tribe (back when DeSoto came through).
Possibly of interest, I read a book written by some anthropologists who studied Indian populations and their disappearance. The earliest Spanish explorers noted huge Indian towns on the lower Mississippi. 200 years later, the French missionaries going up the Mississippi saw only wilderness. As white settlers moved west, they encountered wilder and wilder country and smaller and smaller Indian populations Why?

The writers blamed it on the pigs the Spanish explorers, including Desoto, brought with them. Pigs are a natural for an exploring small army as a food supply. They multiply rapidly, can live on the land and aren’t terribly difficult to herd. But there is one negative. They do have some tendency to run off from the herd. Hogs carry almost all human diseases. These writers believed enough hogs escaped into the woods to multiply and spread Eurasian diseases among the Indians. After 200 years of that, whole populations of Indians were just gone, and the land returned to wilderness.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top