As my catechist told me, we echo about what the Word of God is telling to our lives. I think it is a beautiful way to summarize.
I am sorry, but this does not make any sense to me. The Word of God is telling me a lot of good things. But it is telling me and “to my life”. My life is not a separate thing from me. One can talk to me but not “to my life”!
We are absolutely sure that when we go to heaven, she [Carmen] will receive and greet us at the gate and then she leads us by our hand to the Lord to see Him face-to-face in eternity.
Oh please! Are you sure there is a greeting person welcoming you to heaven? Your assumptions are not really supported by theology.
My brothers in my community are the witnesses that Jesus loves me!
Your brothers? Is this a community of males only? Is there a gender based separation into disctinct communities in NCW?
If you have an adolescent son, you should not talk about alcohol at all, because he will try it out. It is called natural concupiscence we were all born with.
My son overstepped the permission he had. You call this natural?! Hmm! I don’t know what principles you use raising your kids, but in my family rules are rules. Period. This is the Catholic understanding. When I give permission to my son to go to a party, it is NOT a blanket permission to do whatever he wants to do! He must follow our agreement.
Likewise, if NCW has a permission to say short instructions to Scripture readings
before they are read, this should NOT be construed as a blanket approval of unlimited “echos”
after the Scripture readings. Especially not before the homily.
Do you feel NCW is keeping its agreement with Pope Benedict, as expressed by the letter of Cardinal Arinze?
Of ocurse we echo before the homily, because we echo on the Scripture readings. We don’t echo on the homily, but on the Word of God.
That sounds defiance to me. Cardinal Arinze, following the intention of Pope Benedict, sanctioned to the Neocatechumenal Way that short testimonies might be said
after the homily “as an illustration of the regular homily delivered by the celebrating priest”. It is a direct violation of the rule, the words of instruction of the Arinze letter, to “echo” before the priest has had his homily delivered.
You keep avoiding to give an honest answer to the questions raised here. You are trying to explain away the meaning of the words of instruction laid out in the Arinze letter. You keep changing the context to avoid straithforward response. This is extremely unfortunate!