G
grandfather
Guest
Xavierlives,
Unless I’m not getting it, I have thought I have been understanding that the “beatific vision” is basically to live like angels, in the presence of God. What am I missing?
Xavierlives,
Unless I’m not getting it, I have thought I have been understanding that the “beatific vision” is basically to live like angels, in the presence of God. What am I missing?
Mormons don’t think that they know more than the apostles did. But they do think that the Bible does not contain everything that the apostles knew. One can allude such a thought from the scripture: Mark 4:11Just another example of the Mormons not believing the bible. They think they know more about heaven than the apostles did.
We Catholics accept that we will not know what heaven holds in store for us until we get there, because God said so. I’m sure that whatever awaits us in heaven is far beyond anything Joseph Smith made up, or anything Parker makes up.
Neither do Mormons know exactly and perfectly the details of Eternal Life. What I DO know is though, is just a thought, that in this life, the time i am happiest, is when i am progressing, doing something with my family, relationships with loved ones are progressing, or skills at work, or school, when i notice improvements and progress in my self, it is a source of happiness, incomparable to when i progress spiritually. That is why it makes sense to me that Eternal happiness and exaltation could be so utterly and incomprehensibly enjoyable progressing for eternity, and helping others progress as well. If that blows your mind as absurd, or hard to believe, the same way it is hard for me to believe the explanation of the beatific vision, i do not impose my thoughts upon you, but offer them as a subject of contemplation.You’re not getting it. WE DON’T KNOW what the beatific vision will be like. What part of “we don’t know” is hard for you to understand? Is it because Mormons are taught that anything they can’t understand cannot be true?
This is true. It’s kinda like the universe, it is hard to comprehend that there is no end to it. Do we share that belief? Because naturally having been born and looking towards a death, we understand a beginning and an end. And we understand rooms there is a beginning to a room, and a back to the room. But where there is a wall, there is something on the other side of that wall. So really, we have two contradicting instincts. However i agree with what Catholics seem to believe, that the life after this there is no time. It is eternal.Time had a beginning. It will have an end. Jesus says He is the Alpha and Omega, the beginning and end of all things. Time is the progression of events, meaning change. There is a before and after and now. Growth and progress, progression, presume change. Eternal things do not change. It is very difficult to comprehend being fixed, the same, unchanging, because all we have ever known is change. Everything in time moves and is changed. Change is possible here in this life and reality.
I can appreciate your logic here. sort of the, ‘no two things can occupy the same space’ kinda thing. However, LDS logic kind of breaks your system of logic in that what you just rationalized is based upon a belief that nothing can be revealed to us from heaven, and so we either know ( by basing it on this life ) or we dont ( because we’re becoming a butterfly). LDS logic is different with the addition of the principle or concept of learning by revelation. In other words, if you could talk to a caterpillar and show to it images of the butterfly it was going to become, and tell him what plants he needed to eat most of and where to create his cocoon in order to secure that he become the absolute most beautiful butterfly that he could. He would then be able to understand what is to come, and the conditions that must be met in order to become it.There are two contradicting propositions, a and b. If a is true, b can not be true, and vice versa.
Either we can know what it will be like when we die, or we can’t. Logic is not disparagement, unless one is illogical. If we can know what the next life is like, then it is true that it must be like this life, because we can only know what we have known. If the next life is not what this life is like then our experience of life here does not help us understand what is coming, vis, the caterpillar to butterfly analogy.
If we can know what the next life is like, then scripture is false, because it clearly testifies in various places that we can not know these things.
If we can not know what the next life is like, you or I may think we know, but we don’t. If we can not know what the next life is like, that means what is there is unknowable to us. It is different from anything we have experienced here. Another way of saying this is it is a mystery to us.
When people who assert that scripture is true, find their beliefs contradicted by scripture they try to convolute the meaning to harmonize the two. In the end they become illogical, but insist they are not.
Really, the lds have admitted this to you: that they are into porn? How interesting. And you don’t know any catholics who are into porn? Porn is very addictive and a multbillion dollar business. I am sure that there must be a catholic or two into porn. Unless, of course, the porn addicts are only protestants, mormons, muslims, Jehovah’s Witnesses etc.That’s funny. I know more LDS who are into porn even though they are married. Catholics? none. They revere their wives too much, and find it appalling.
.
Actually this is not entirely true. There is more to heaven than what you are claiming and the mormons are probably not to far off the mark. As for catholics, heaven will be a place for work. Let take saint therese who is at this moment spending her heaven doíng good on earth. This doing good on earth does take work. It is not a job for just prayer and contemplation. In fact, most catholic saints are attempting to spend their heaven doing good on earth. They are action saints.See, many Mormons, when asking about the traditional beliefs on Heaven, are disturbed because they will frequently ask what we will be “doing” in Heaven, as in, activities. For Catholics, knowing that we will be in the eternal, uninhibited presence of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, with our families (hopefully if they are saved as well), as well as the entire communion of saints, partaking in the divine nature (theosis), is more than enough to try to comprehend. And of course those in Heaven now (while they will not have the full experience of Heaven until after the resurrection) also pray for the saints on earth. Mormons have concepts such as being spirit missionaries in the spirit world to those in prison, having eternal increase (spirit children), etc. A common question asked by many Mormons to traditional Christians is whether “all” we will be doing is singing hymns or Gregorian chants for eternity (I believe I saw that statement either here or on another forum).
Oh please, show me where dogmatically the Catholic Church has said that there is more to Heaven that what I stated. As I said, the Mormon understanding of Heaven is incompatible with the Catholic understanding of Heaven, since both are also tied to our understandings of what it means to be “partakers of the divine nature”. Things like eternal increase (spirit children), eternal marriage, having worlds for these spirit children, etc. are all incompatible with Catholicism.Actually this is not entirely true. There is more to heaven than what you are claiming and the mormons are probably not to far off the mark. As for catholics, heaven will be a place for work. Let take saint therese who is at this moment spending her heaven doíng good on earth. This doing good on earth does take work. It is not a job for just prayer and contemplation. In fact, most catholic saints are attempting to spend their heaven doing good on earth. They are action saints.
Hmm, this reminds me of a post of yours about all those racist Catholics you know/knew, and how none of the Mormons you know/knew were racist.Really, the lds have admitted this to you: that they are into porn? How interesting. And you don’t know any catholics who are into porn? Porn is very addictive and a multbillion dollar business. I am sure that there must be a catholic or two into porn. Unless, of course, the porn addicts are only protestants, mormons, muslims, Jehovah’s Witnesses etc.
In the next life my parents will still be my parents and my children will be my children. My wife and I cooperated with God and created them. But we won’t be creating any more of them. That happens here, not hereafter.Celestial marriage is actually quite a nice idea. It certainly would be wonderful to be eternally married to the one that one is married to. I kinda like the idea. And together throughout eternity, they can grow together and eternally progress as a unit. Wonderful.
Titus 1:15 Unto the pure all things are pure: but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled.We remain who we are. We love one another eternally, but Mormons and Muslims think that heaven means a lot of sexual activity, 72 virgins to maximize the pleasure of their martyrs, or lots of wives.
This comes from their founders who were unable to control themselves in that area and thought if heaven is so great that their sexual delight will be even better there.
People of all religions will do evil things that their relgions condemn as moral failure. When you try to justify evil behavior by using religion you have a major breakdown.
like the universe, it is hard to comprehend that there is no end to it. Do we share that belief?
mrparker;5913929:
My saying “Catholics do not believe in Divine Revelation” was meaning “Continued Revelation.” So thank you for clarifiying.By saying that Catholics do not believe in Divine Revelation you are only making yourself
look foolish. The reason public revelation is complete and there can be no more is God Himself is revealed to us in Jesus. God still can speak to us and does, but what we need to know for salvation is completed two thousand years ago. In His words. It is finished.
mrparker;5913929:
Amen!No and if you believe this you can not believe in God and if you want to believe in the Being who is Immortal God you need to change. The physical universe had a beginning and it has an end. Only God is infinite and the physical universe is not God. It is created by God. Scientists used to believe the universe was infinite, always existed, but now they do not. They believed matter existed forever and moved around, collided, exploded and changed, but eternally existed. They could not see a beginning or end, but now see evidence of the beginning, a red glow in an expanding universe with everytihng moving away from everything else. When it was first proposed that the universe had a beginning this contradicted what they all thought from Aristotle to Einstein. If it was true they had to all be wrong. The term “big bang” was coined as a derogatory term describing the notion of an explosion that brought the universe into being. If Mormons believe the universe has no end they have no concept at all of the God of the Jews and Christians, the creator of all that is. Only God had no beginning. Only God is uncreated, eternal. God is the supreme spirit, who alone exists of Himself, and is infinite in all of His perfections. You do not exist of yourself. You are caused. God and only God is uncaused.
No. You are able to create others here, not hereafter. You procreate. Angels do not. Mormi is fiction.
Logic says you can not be fixed and progressing. There is no eternal progress. Progress presumes change. Outside of time there is no change. Things are fixed. Progress is things moving forward forever. Instead the eternal procession (not progression) is God giving Himself to Himself and then giving Himself back again. The Father gives Himself to the Son eternally, and the Son gives Himself to the Father. What they give to one another is identical to what they are. God is love. Love gives love to love, a trinity also reflected in our own lives.
God lowered Himself to share in our nature so that He could raise us to share in His. You can participate in divine nature as Saint Peter writes, but you can not be who God is. Jesus can share Himself with you. He can give Himself to you, body, blood, soul and divinity, and you can give back. That will make you like Him, but you are still you, not Him. You do not become God and create your own universe or planet.
Irrational. There is no LDS logic, my logic or your logic. There is simply logic. A thing or statement is logical or illogical.
This is an entirely baseless assertion. You make crazy claims that Catholics don’t believe in revealation and then try to build something on them.
Take your analogy, if you could talk to a caterpillar. God came here to talk to you. God sent us prophets. They told us what God wanted to tell us. They brought some message and revealed information to us. He wanted to speak to us directly, God to all of us. The only way He could do that was to become one of us and use words. He wanted to show us something (revelation) that could only be understood by Him taking on our nature and being with us.
He wanted to show us essentially two things. He wanted to show us how much He loved us and how much our sins hurt Him. When you think about the ALMIGHTY GOD, who spoke all creation into existence, you can be awed by the power of it all. Imagine speaking all the galaxies into existance. How could a puny creature like you or me offend or hurt an omnipotent being? He came to show us, so that seeing this we might repent of our evil. When you see Jesus crucified you can see what your sins do to God. In this life love and sacrifice are inseparatble. He showed us how much He loves us in the same moment. Mormons do not believe this. They do not believe God Himself came among us in the person of Jesus.
By saying that Catholics do not believe in Divine Revelation you are only making yourself
look foolish. The reason public revelation is complete and there can be no more is God Himself is revealed to us in Jesus. God still can speak to us and does, but what we need to know for salvation is completed two thousand years ago. In His words. It is finished.
So am I correct to assume that you do believe that God revealed his gospel and truths to the prophets of the Old Testament to be delivered to His people. And you believe that He continued to do so until finally He came down in the form of Jesus Christ to demonstrate to us what our sins did to Him, and then he was resurrected, and now does not reveal anything futher to us, leaving us to ourselves and our own interpretations of the teachings He left behind for 2000+ years?Take your analogy, if you could talk to a caterpillar. God came here to talk to you. God sent us prophets. They told us what God wanted to tell us. They brought some message and revealed information to us. He wanted to speak to us directly, God to all of us. The only way He could do that was to become one of us and use words. He wanted to show us something (revelation) that could only be understood by Him taking on our nature and being with us.
Even this is not completely accurate. Catholics believe that revelation from Heaven continues, and many of our canonized saints were also prophets and prophetesses. Catholic history is rich with visits from many Heavenly beings. Catholics believe that all that was necessary for salvation has already been revealed, hence there is no more “public revelation”. However all people can and do receive private revelations, and God can and does choose to reveal various messages through certain people. Marian apparitions are one major grouping of such events in Catholicism. Any new revelations (which cannot contradict what has already been revealed from apostolic times) are not required for salvation, however they can of course help one on their journey.My saying “Catholics do not believe in Divine Revelation” was meaning “Continued Revelation.” So thank you for clarifiying.
No. Jesus left us the Church which still endures after 2000 years. The Holy Spirit leads the Church into all truth, as Jesus promised He would (John 14;26; John 16:13). We Catholics have a sure guide to interpreting scripture - the Holy Spirit working through the magisterium (teaching authority) of the Church. This magisterial authority is most accutely demonstrated in the ecumenical councils of the church, wherein the great questions of doctrine and biblical interpretation are authoritatively proclaimed under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.So am I correct to assume that you do believe that God revealed his gospel and truths to the prophets of the Old Testament to be delivered to His people. And you believe that He continued to do so until finally He came down in the form of Jesus Christ to demonstrate to us what our sins did to Him, and then he was resurrected, and now does not reveal anything futher to us, leaving us to ourselves and our own interpretations of the teachings He left behind for 2000+ years?
Just saying, those of us who aren’t secretly married, get at least to be like angels, that’s all.Xavierlives,
Unless I’m not getting it, I have thought I have been understanding that the “beatific vision” is basically to live like angels, in the presence of God. What am I missing?
God can talk to caterpillars.Take your analogy, if you could talk to a caterpillar. God came here to talk to you. God sent us prophets. They told us what God wanted to tell us. They brought some message and revealed information to us. He wanted to speak to us directly, God to all of us. The only way He could do that was to become one of us and use words. He wanted to show us something (revelation) that could only be understood by Him taking on our nature and being with us.