LDS: Did God 'create' Jesus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter campeador
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
SteveVH,
Those are fair questions and make sense to ask.

The light of Christ (conscience) is given to every person born on earth. If they listen to and heed their conscience, they can choose good things even despite not knowing about Christ or knowing He is their Redeemer–they can choose to be loving, choose to honor their parents, choose to be honest, choose to be virtuous, and so forth. These choices are “progress” choices they certainly can and do make.
We have a responsibility to inform our conscience and when we don’t we make wrong choices. Yes, we should follow our conscience to a degree, but when it is not informed by Christ, it can lead us astray in a hurry. I’m sure the terrorists who flew planes into the twin towers had no problem dealing with their conscience. Our conscience, then, cannot be the light of Christ unless we fill our conscience with the light of Christ.
So I was not talking about being “saved by Christ”, which needs to be a conscious choice unless by little children before they have self-accountability; I was talking about “progress” during this earth life, through making conscious “good” choices as opposed to conscious “bad” choices.

As far as being “saved by Christ”, that is what all of mankind needs to do through making a conscious choice if they were old enough to be self-accountable, in order to be purified from their sins and the consequences of their wrong choices.
Parker, what is the point of progressing if we are not saved? What are we progressing toward and why the emphasis on “progression” instead of salvation. You speak as though salvation is just a choice we make, rather than a daily process of conversion in which we diminish and Christ increases. Salvation has nothing to do with human progression. It has to do with human submission to the will of God. Until we surrender ourselves completely, we will not enter the kingdom of heaven. Salvation is a gift of a loving God. How far do you think the “good thief” hanging on the cross next to Jesus had progressed? He was saved by acknowledging his sin, having true contrition for that sin and asking to be saved.

After all the time I have spent in conversations with Mormons on this forum, I have yet to understand how your doctrine of progression fits in with salvation. But, one thing that has become abundantly clear is that your focus is on progression and not salvation. Please explain . Thanks.
 
We have a responsibility to inform our conscience and when we don’t we make wrong choices. Yes, we should follow our conscience to a degree, but when it is not informed by Christ, it can lead us astray in a hurry. … Our conscience, then, cannot be the light of Christ unless we fill our conscience with the light of Christ.
SteveVH,
I would strongly differ about the example you gave. That was a case where conscience had already been lost by those who had not only been taught against their conscience, but had embraced the false teachings. If they had overcome the false teachings, they could refresh the opportunity of their conscience, the light of Christ, to have guided them toward acts of love and unselfishness. There is such a thing as a conscience being “seared”.
Parker, what is the point of progressing if we are not saved?
If by the word “saved” you mean “exalted”, then those who progress but aren’t exalted have still improved from where they were at before they began. They are happier, more fulfilled, and will have the happiness and joy they lived for when they are resurrected for eternity, through the atoning grace of Christ gifting them with a degree of salvation they chose.
What are we progressing toward and why the emphasis on “progression” instead of salvation. You speak as though salvation is just a choice we make, rather than a daily process of conversion in which we diminish and Christ increases.
Choosing Christ and His grace is both a starting point and a continuing choice along the way toward the progress needed for exaltation. I agree that the “Christ in us” increases as we follow Him, and that is sanctification.
Salvation has nothing to do with human progression. It has to do with human submission to the will of God. Until we surrender ourselves completely, we will not enter the kingdom of heaven. Salvation is a gift of a loving God. How far do you think the “good thief” hanging on the cross next to Jesus had progressed?
Maybe the “thief” example is a good one. I don’t think he had progressed very much at all, but had evidently reached the “starting point” and then would be able to go on in the spirit world and repent of all his sins, learn from his wrong choices, and show by his faith and continuing belief in Christ what kind of salvation he was going to merit.

He was told, “today shalt thou be with me in Paradise”, but that should have been translated, “today shalt thou be with me in the spirit world”.
He was saved by acknowledging his sin, having true contrition for that sin and asking to be saved.
The New Testament doesn’t say that he was “saved”.
After all the time I have spent in conversations with Mormons on this forum, I have yet to understand how your doctrine of progression fits in with salvation. But, one thing that has become abundantly clear is that your focus is on progression and not salvation. Please explain . Thanks.
It has to do with a broader perspective about “salvation”, “progress through making choices,” “gaining wisdom”, and “what it means to have progressed through the grace of Christ to the promised blessing of exaltation.”
 
JAVL,
Thanks for the wish of peace, and I reciprocate that wish for you and your loved ones.
And I hold the same for you and yours.
Your statement that I numbered (1) is a puzzler–since the Bible does reveal much of God’s divine plan of salvation.
Only that what is given for us to know. It is not His total plan. He does not make it up as He goes along.
If you find where in the Bible (besides in the Apocrypha) it was revealed and plainly understood that God created all things (including specifically, Satan) from nothing, then we can evaluate fairly the statement that a belief contrary to that teaching would be contrary to the Bible.
Peace and good health to you.
Nowhere in any scripture concerning creation does it say that God used any material, known or unknown, visible or invisible to create. If he did, as you state, then He is NOT omniscient or omnipotent but simply a more capable and advanced entity who can do magic tricks. He can be looked upon as a “superscientist” who has learned how to control nature. I would look upon him as the ancients looked upon their gods. I would not worship Him, but I may venerate Him.

Remember, nothing is impossible with God. He CAN make something out of nothing as is so aptly described in Genesis. That is why He is God. Shalom.

PAX DOMINI :signofcross:

Shalom Aleichem
 
SteveVH,
I would strongly differ about the example you gave. That was a case where conscience had already been lost by those who had not only been taught against their conscience, but had embraced the false teachings. If they had overcome the false teachings, they could refresh the opportunity of their conscience, the light of Christ, to have guided them toward acts of love and unselfishness. There is such a thing as a conscience being “seared”.
Sometimes I wonder why I even try.
If by the word “saved” you mean “exalted”, then those who progress but aren’t exalted have still improved from where they were at before they began. They are happier, more fulfilled, and will have the happiness and joy they lived for when they are resurrected for eternity, through the atoning grace of Christ gifting them with a degree of salvation they chose.

Choosing Christ and His grace is both a starting point and a continuing choice along the way toward the progress needed for exaltation. I agree that the “Christ in us” increases as we follow Him, and that is sanctification.
No, by saved I don’t mean exalted, I mean saved. What you have said here is very telling, Parker. Being saved means one thing, that I am going to heaven rather than hell.
And if I make it to heaven it will be because of the mercy of God, not because I have progressed through my own merits.

The only one to be exalted is the Lord, our God. Our posture should be one of complete humility, not one of exalting ourselves. Your statement reminds me very much of the idea behind reincarnation. If you don’t make it the first time, no worries. You’ll get another chance, as many as you need, until you reach the state of divinity.

Your notion of salvation is so foreign to Christianity that it is unrecognizable. I had no idea, until now, how deep in error the Mormon church is on this, the most basic doctrine. We are in need of salvation, not exaltation. It isn’t about us, it is about a God, who loved us so much that He sent His only Son to pay our debt, to suffer and die for us, so that we might spend eternity with Him. It is about the unfathomable love of a merciful God. We are nothing but miserable wretches, yet He loves us and gives us dignity and desires to spend eternity with us as His adopted sons and daughters. It is not about us desiring glory and exaltation for ourselves.
Maybe the “thief” example is a good one. I don’t think he had progressed very much at all, but had evidently reached the “starting point” and then would be able to go on in the spirit world and repent of all his sins, learn from his wrong choices, and show by his faith and continuing belief in Christ what kind of salvation he was going to merit.

He was told, “today shalt thou be with me in Paradise”, but that should have been translated, “today shalt thou be with me in the spirit world”.
And it just gets stranger and stranger. I’ve said enough about the notion of progression. But where in God’s universe do you come up with "but that should have been translated 'today you will be with me in the spirit world’". Says who? I realize that you would like it to say that but the fact is that is doesn’t. I would love to see your source for this assertion. Help me, oh God.
The New Testament doesn’t say that he was “saved”.
If you are in Paradise, you are saved, trust me on this one.
It has to do with a broader perspective about “salvation”, “progress through making choices,” “gaining wisdom”, and “what it means to have progressed through the grace of Christ to the promised blessing of exaltation.”
So its all up to you. All I have to say is good luck! 👍
 
So that I might get this train back to its original tracks… 😉
What puzzles me during a conversation such as this (although I am heartily glad to have been pointed toward the C.S. Lewis chapter where “Only Begotten Son” is discussed), is why it is such a sensitive point to think that Christ could and would learn by observation, by instruction from His perfect Father, and thus in short order from having become a Spirit, gain the attributes (omniscience, omnipotence, unconditional love for all spirits and all intelligences, love of all truth, and love of the exercise of free will and choice) of God.

Since I view God the Father as truly, completely omnipotent and omniscient, I look at such a process as being totally consistent with His character and attributes–that He could have such a Son, a Separate Person and with such a highly sensitized brightness of teachableness that His Only Begotten Son would be able to become God through being instructed by His Father, through observation, and through His own innate ability. Then, when He had become God, it would be a completely understandable and true statement that He is unchangeable, and that is how we would have viewed Him from our perspective as spirits. (We weren’t there when He was “becoming”–we were only there after He had “become” and our eternity as a spirit began.)
So, are you are saying that Jesus was not always a god, but his father was a god, and taught Jesus how to be a god?
 
So that I might get this train back to its original tracks… 😉

So, are you are saying that Jesus was not always a god, but his father was a god, and taught Jesus how to be a god?
Campeador, I apologize for going off topic. I have started a new thread to hopefully get some answers concerning progression and salvation.
 
Campeador, I apologize for going off topic. I have started a new thread to hopefully get some answers concerning progression and salvation.
No problem. I noticed you’d started a new thread. Good luck with it. 🙂
 
Zaffiroborant,

I honestly don’t understand why it seems people aren’t able to distinguish between being able to choose among choices, and saying such a statement as the above. Having the opportunity to choose is good for us. If you want to choose evil, then that would not be good for you, nor would it be good for me. But having the opportunity to choose good over evil, is a good thing, a “growth” thing.
Growth and progression are dependent upon evil then, without evil’s presence there would be no opportunity to progress no way to achieve exaltation.
 
Growth and progression are dependent upon [the existence of the opportunity for a choice of] evil then, without [the existence of that opportunity for a choice of evil and thus evil’s presence during mortality, excluding during the Millenium] there would be no opportunity to progress no way to achieve exaltation [because there would be insufficient opportunity to choose good over evil].
Zaffiroborant,
For us, who didn’t gain perfection by observation the way Jesus did in His pre-mortal life before we knew Him, the statement as I have amended it would be a true statement–that is why there was a plan of salvation and why Jesus could be the Redeemer.

God does all things He has done for the benefit of man, including having allowed evil to happen and having allowed Satan to be involved on earth.
 
Sometimes I wonder why I even try.

Says who? I would love to see your source for this assertion. …good luck! 👍
SteveVH,
I certainly do agree with point one. We have gone in circles.

Says who? Says John by not even mentioning it, says Matthew by saying what he said about the thieves, says Peter by teaching about repentance and about spirit prison.

But you’ll never get it–one verse defines that part of your beliefs, so Luke (as mistranslated) carries the day. It allows you to believe precisely what you want to believe.
 
SteveVH,
I certainly do agree with point one. We have gone in circles.

Says who? Says John by not even mentioning it, says Matthew by saying what he said about the thieves, says Peter by teaching about repentance and about spirit prison.

But you’ll never get it–one verse defines that part of your beliefs, so Luke (as mistranslated) carries the day. It allows you to believe precisely what you want to believe.
I would love to respond and have started another thread on this very subject for the reason that we have gone off topic for this thread. I would really appreciate your answers there.
 
So, are you are saying that Jesus was not always God, but his Father was God, and taught Jesus how to be God?
Campeador,

I said Jesus is the Only Begotten Son, and that He was the supreme intelligence of all intelligences, and as such could have learned by observation and then been God the Son at the first moment He was Begotten as the Only Begotten Son, or could have been the Only Begotten Son and then quickly learned by observation and instruction to be God like His Father, and thus would at the moment of being God the Son be One with His Father, being omniscient and omnipotent. It matters not to us in what order those events happened–in either order of becoming God the Son through being Begotten as the Only Begotten Son, Alpha and Omega, or being prepared and foreordained to be so as an intelligence and then instantaneously being so when He was the Firstborn. (We knew Him as God the Son, the Only Begotten Son, Alpha and Omega, in our relationship to Him–that is what matters to us.)

God the Son, the Holy Spirit, and God the Father are One God because of their unity, their single purpose, and their united will and omniscience.
 
I would love to respond and have started another thread on this very subject for the reason that we have gone off topic for this thread. I would really appreciate your answers there.
SteveVH,
I have sincerely tried to answer to the best of my ability within time constraints. I just don’t have the time to get into that topic on another thread. (When I participate, I feel obligated to answer questions. That becomes a long process.) Hopefully, someone else may have that kind of time.

Peace and best wishes to you and your family.
 
Campeador,

I said Jesus is the Only Begotten Son, and that He was the supreme intelligence of all intelligences, and as such could have learned by observation and then been God the Son at the first moment He was Begotten as the Only Begotten Son, or could have been the Only Begotten Son and then quickly learned by observation and instruction to be God like His Father, and thus would at the moment of being God the Son be One with His Father, being omniscient and omnipotent. It matters not to us in what order those events happened–in either order of becoming God the Son through being Begotten as the Only Begotten Son, Alpha and Omega, or being prepared and foreordained to be so as an intelligence and then instantaneously being so when He was the Firstborn. (We knew Him as God the Son, the Only Begotten Son, Alpha and Omega, in our relationship to Him–that is what matters to us.)

God the Son, the Holy Spirit, and God the Father are One God because of their unity, their single purpose, and their united will and omniscience.
So, again, Jesus was not always a god? Thanks for your patience, BTW. 🙂
 
Zaffiroborant,
For us, who didn’t gain perfection by observation the way Jesus did in His pre-mortal life before we knew Him, the statement as I have amended it would be a true statement–that is why there was a plan of salvation and why Jesus could be the Redeemer.

God does all things He has done for the benefit of man, including having allowed evil to happen and having allowed Satan to be involved on earth.
Yes I see evil is a benefit to mankind and without it exaltation would be impossible, which is why God cultivated or enabled it by empowering Satan.
 
Campeador,

I said Jesus is the Only Begotten Son, and that He was the supreme intelligence of all intelligences, and as such could have learned by observation and then been God the Son at the first moment He was Begotten as the Only Begotten Son, or could have been the Only Begotten Son and then quickly learned by observation and instruction to be God like His Father, and thus would at the moment of being God the Son be One with His Father, being omniscient and omnipotent. It matters not to us in what order those events happened–in either order of becoming God the Son through being Begotten as the Only Begotten Son, Alpha and Omega, or being prepared and foreordained to be so as an intelligence and then instantaneously being so when He was the Firstborn. (We knew Him as God the Son, the Only Begotten Son, Alpha and Omega, in our relationship to Him–that is what matters to us.)

God the Son, the Holy Spirit, and God the Father are One God because of their unity, their single purpose, and their united will and omniscience.
But you have never explained how He is the Only Begotten Son in light of the teaching that we all are the spirit children (you, me, Jesus, Satan) of heavenly parents.
 
SteveVH,
I have sincerely tried to answer to the best of my ability within time constraints. I just don’t have the time to get into that topic on another thread. (When I participate, I feel obligated to answer questions. That becomes a long process.) Hopefully, someone else may have that kind of time.

Peace and best wishes to you and your family.
Well, we were getting into here, I just thought it would be more appropriate on another thread as it isn’t fair to Campeador to derail the subject matter of his thread, nor do the moderators appreciate us going off topic.

I appreciate the conversation wih you Parker and sorry that I got a little out of hand. But I am more confused than ever on how Mormons view salvation.

Anyway, thanks and God bless.
 
So, again, Jesus was not always God? Thanks for your patience, BTW. 🙂
Campeador,

Your question goes back to before the universe began for us as spirits–before “the beginning”. So from our standpoint, from “the beginning”, Jesus has always been God the Son. That is why He is Alpha. As an intelligence, He had the innate capacity to be God the Son, through the endowment of being the Only Begotten Son and the Firstborn and through His capacity as the supremely endowed intelligence.
 
But you have never explained how He is the Only Begotten Son in light of the teaching that we all are the spirit children (you, me, Jesus, Satan) of heavenly parents.
Zaffiroborant,

I know I skirted that question, but had tried to make it somewhat clear earlier that the words “in the flesh” don’t match the scriptures about the Only Begotten Son, so there is a point of clarification that has not yet been revealed, as far as I’m concerned.

I think it is clear that the relationship Jesus has to God the Father is singularly His, from all eternity backward and through all eternity forward. I think the words which should be thought of reverently, “the Only Begotten Son”, convey a singular meaning that is completely unique for His pre-mortal life as compared with ours, as well of course, certainly, for this life.

We ought to always keep in our minds the love the Father has for His Beloved Son, who is His Only Begotten Son, and the supreme love They both have for all of us–that the plan of salvation would reach us in such a profound way as to allow our progress from being spirits to gaining resurrected bodies, and with those resurrected bodies gaining the grace through Christ’s atoning sacrifice that we can be purified from all our sins on condition of our individual, willing and obedient repentance.
 
Zaffiroborant,

I know I skirted that question, but had tried to make it somewhat clear earlier that the words “in the flesh” don’t match the scriptures about the Only Begotten Son, so there is a point of clarification that has not yet been revealed, as far as I’m concerned.

I think it is clear that the relationship Jesus has to God the Father is singularly His, from all eternity backward and through all eternity forward. I think the words which should be thought of reverently, “the Only Begotten Son”, convey a singular meaning that is completely unique for His pre-mortal life as compared with ours, as well of course, certainly, for this life.

We ought to always keep in our minds the love the Father has for His Beloved Son, who is His Only Begotten Son, and the supreme love They both have for all of us–that the plan of salvation would reach us in such a profound way as to allow our progress from being spirits to gaining resurrected bodies, and with those resurrected bodies gaining the grace through Christ’s atoning sacrifice that we can be purified from all our sins on condition of our individual, willing and obedient repentance.
Seems you are skirting it again in this response. IMO you did the same with Campeador’s point.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top