LDS, Do you believe that Jesus died for our salvation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LAMBOFGODGIRLY
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
interestingly, the Lectures of Faith used to be Scripture, part of the Doctrine and Covenants. They were then removed.

There is a lot that is wonderful in LDS belief, but too much seems to be contradicted, or seen as a “transcription/editor error”.
 
Perhaps you also believe that every one of us have always existed from all eternity; originally we all existed as “intelligences”. Then heavenly father and heavenly mother gave us spirit bodies. Then earthly father of an earthly mother gave us our physical bodies. We have existed for ever and we will continue to exist forever. (1) So, what salvation did Jesus die to give us? (2) It’s not salvation from hell (IT IS SALVATION FROM HELL FOR THOSE WHO GO THERE FOR THE THOUSAND YEARS DURING WHICH THEY WILL SUFFER THERE; is it salvation from (NOT “FROM”–INSTEAD “TO”) a lesser degree of eternal glory?

Please answer this one question for me: (3) If I committed the sin of first-degree murder, could I be totally forgiven solely by the merits of the death of Jesus Christ on the cross; and in the hereafter go on to the first-degree of the Celestial Kingdom and be a God?
JohnVIII,
Thanks for the questions, to clarify.

(1) The word “salvation” as I understand the term has two connotations. Most of the time in the New Testament, it is synonymous with what I describe as “exaltation” meaning, “being a joint heir with Jesus Christ through His power and grace.”

The second connotation has limited use in the Bible, but is inferred in passages that say:

Romans 14:9 For to this end Christ both died, and rose, and revived, that he might be Lord both of the dead and living.
10 But why dost thou judge thy brother? or why dost thou set at nought thy brother? for we shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ.
11 For it is written, As I live, saith the Lord, every knee shall bow to me, and every tongue shall confess to God.

Phillipians 2:11 And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Isaiah 45: 23 I have sworn by myself, the word is gone out of my mouth in righteousness, and shall not return, That unto me every knee shall bow, every tongue shall swear.
24 Surely, shall one say, in the Lord have I righteousness and strength: even to him shall men come; and all that are incensed against him shall be ashamed.
25 In the Lord shall all the seed of Israel be justified, and shall glory.

Revelation 21:6 And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely.
7 He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son.
8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

Revelation 22:11 He that is unjust, let him be unjust still: and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still: and he that is righteous, let him be righteous still: and he that is holy, let him be holy still.
12 And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be.
13 I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last.
14 Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
15 For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie.

Revelation 20:10 And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.
11 And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them.
12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.
13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works.
14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.
15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.

Now, in these passages, note that many are cast into the lake of fire, but as I read the above verse 10, the devil suffers that condition for ever and ever, but the others do not–they are eventually rescued, consistent with Isaiah 61:1-5. They are rescued from prison. This is a condition of “salvation” or “rescue”, but it only provides a rescue from eternal torment–not a rescue into a condition of being a “joint heir” and having allowance into the “city” described in Revelation 22:14. They indeed receive “according to their works”, yet they confess that Jesus is the Christ and He rescues them from eternal torment to allow them limited glory because that is what they chose.

(3) Absolutely not. King David understood that he would be rescued from Hell, but had disqualified himself from being a joint heir because of what he had done with Uriah.
 
ParkerD,

By substance we typically mean what makes God, God. The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are all distinct persons:

"254 The divine persons are really distinct from one another. "God is one but not solitary."86 “Father”, “Son”, “Holy Spirit” are not simply names designating modalities of the divine being, for they are really distinct from one another: "He is not the Father who is the Son, nor is the Son he who is the Father, nor is the Holy Spirit he who is the Father or the Son.“87”

So, the Catechism is saying that the Son is not the Father, the Father is not the Son, the Holy Spirit is not the Father or the Son. They are distinct persons. They are one in that they are all the same substance. "In the words of the Fourth Lateran Council (1215), "Each of the persons is that supreme reality, viz., the divine substance, essence or nature.“85”, “The divine persons do not share the one divinity among themselves but each of them is God whole and entire”. So, they are three separate, distinct persons, yet they all are that one substance that makes God, God. One person isn’t more or less of that substance, as they are all co-equal.

We believe we are co-heirs in Christ, sharing in His Resurrection. In salvation we are risen up with Christ, participating in His heavenly life. " 1025 To live in heaven is “to be with Christ.” The elect live "in Christ,“598 but they retain, or rather find, their true identity, their own name.599”. We also believe that we will truly behold God, through the beatific vision. Through the beatific vision we will be able to see God in all His glory.
Religio71,
I would love to understand what you personally believe will be the living conditions and activities as you “participate in His heavenly life.” I only ask that because I don’t know other than the expression that “it is beyond our comprehension”. Why couldn’t it mean really participate in His heavenly life, by being like Him just as the Apostle John said and like Christ Himself taught?

I still don’t get the concept of “one substance”, unless you mean “one eternal unchangeable Truth–the Way, the Truth, and the Life,” in which case we are agreed on that point.
 
Religio71,
I would love to understand what you personally believe will be the living conditions and activities as you “participate in His heavenly life.” I only ask that because I don’t know other than the expression that “it is beyond our comprehension”. Why couldn’t it mean really participate in His heavenly life, by being like Him just as the Apostle John said and like Christ Himself taught?

I still don’t get the concept of “one substance”, unless you mean “one eternal unchangeable Truth–the Way, the Truth, and the Life,” in which case we are agreed on that point.
As Catholics, we believe that in Heaven, we live with the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, with Mary, with all the saints of the Church, and the angels. By living in Christ, we find out our true nature, whatever that may be. (One interesting thing I find in the Catechism is that we “retain, or rather find, their true identity, their own name”. This seems vaguely related to the LDS practice of giving one a new name as part of the Endowment, though there are stories of ex members that many people have the same “new name”…still interesting). It is true that life in Heaven is beyond our comprehension, as it is beyond everything that we have experienced on Earth. I don’t believe that we know much about our “activities”, except that we will be living eternally with the Blessed Trinity.

They are of one substance in that they are of one Divine Nature. They are all fully God. The Divine nature is not divided amongst them, as they are all fully that Divine Nature, the Essence.
 
I may be way off base, but it seems like Mormons today don’t believe in a lot of the stuff that was taught by Brigham Young and Joseph Smith.
The Church’s position has always been that its theological foundation rests in the Church’s scriptural canon, which we call the standard works. In those early days churches were more charismatic than they are today, and there were a small group of Church leaders who were prone to speculative thinking on doctrine, which did not have a basis in the standard works. The Pratt brothers, Orson Hyde, and Brigham Young are among those who did engage in speculative thinking on doctrine that was later proved to have been incorrect. But that is because they failed to abide by the teachings of the standard works. If they had stuck to that closely, those doctrinal mistakes would not have been made. In subsequent years there were always a few people who continued that tradition of speculative thinking about doctrine. B H Roberts, James E Talmage, and Bruce R McConkie may be named among the prominent ones. But that has now died out, and Church leaders are much more caution in their teachings to ensure that it conforms to what God has revealed in the scriptural canon of the Church.

The case of Joseph Smith is a little ambiguous. Joseph Smith himself was not guilty of that kind of speculative thinking—but his King Follett discourse may be the only exception. In a couple of interviews that the late President Gordon B Hinckley gave to the public press, he cast doubt on the validity of some of the teachings of the King Follett Discourse. Those teachings of course are not supported by the standard works.
For sure, they don’t believe in polygamy anymore.
Well, we don’t practice it, but the Church has not abandoned its theological validity. We don’t practice it today because it is declared to be against the law of the land; and we are commanded to abide by the law of the land. But it still remains valid as a theological principle.
I don’t know for sure, but people with their own planets, and God impregnating Mary seems to be debatable too.
Those are good examples of speculative thinking that have no basis in LDS scripture. They are speculations and are not true LDS doctrine.
I think they are more mainstream in a lot of thier religious beliefs now, but of course they have beliefs and practices unique to the LDS church. At least that is what I think I am gleaning from these posts.
“Mainstream” is not a word I would use. I would say two things have happened. Firstly the Church is better understood today than it was before. A lot of the disinformation spread out by the enemies of the Church has been neutralized, and people understand us better than they did in earlier days. The Church has also grown bigger and more influential, and cannot be so easily misrepresented as it was before. On the other hand, the Church has also been careful to rectify some of the mistakes of the past, and ensure that its teachings are more accurate and conform to what the Lord has revealed.

But at the same time, as you have pointed out, there are certain uniquely Mormon theological beliefs that set it apart from other Christian churches, that the Church had not and cannot abandon. They include the Book of Mormon, as a new revelation and an addition to the scriptural canon; the prophetic calling of Joseph Smith; and the restoration of the Priesthood and Church in the last days. These are what makes Mormonism unique, which it could not abandon without losing its true identity.

zerinus
 
As Catholics, we believe that in Heaven, we live with the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, with Mary, with all the saints of the Church, and the angels. By living in Christ, we find out our true nature, whatever that may be. (One interesting thing I find in the Catechism is that we “retain, or rather find, their true identity, their own name”. This seems vaguely related to the LDS practice of giving one a new name as part of the Endowment, though there are stories of ex members that many people have the same “new name”…still interesting). It is true that life in Heaven is beyond our comprehension, as it is beyond everything that we have experienced on Earth. I don’t believe that we know much about our “activities”, except that we will be living eternally with the Blessed Trinity.

They are of one substance in that they are of one Divine Nature. They are all fully God. The Divine nature is not divided amongst them, as they are all fully that Divine Nature, the Essence.
However, we as Catholics are also supposed to believe in Purgatory, where most of us poor sinners will end up. Somehow, I don’t envision my Mother who recently died as being in Purgatory, but rather in Heaven watching over me. Also, I don’t really think either Catholics or Mormons really know what is going to happen after death. According to the Bible, there’s a disconnect between going to heaven or hell - either at the time of our death, or on Judgement Day. But as humans, we would prefer to think that our loved ones are in Heaven waiting for us to join them when we die.
 
However, we as Catholics are also supposed to believe in Purgatory, where most of us poor sinners will end up. Somehow, I don’t envision my Mother who recently died as being in Purgatory, but rather in Heaven watching over me. Also, I don’t really think either Catholics or Mormons really know what is going to happen after death. According to the Bible, there’s a disconnect between going to heaven or hell - either at the time of our death, or on Judgement Day. But as humans, we would prefer to think that our loved ones are in Heaven waiting for us to join them when we die.
Yes, many/most of us will go to Purgatory after death, which purifies us to enter into God’s eternal presence in Heaven.
 
interestingly, the Lectures of Faith used to be Scripture, part of the Doctrine and Covenants. They were then removed.

There is a lot that is wonderful in LDS belief, but too much seems to be contradicted, or seen as a “transcription/editor error”.
Religio71 and Catholic20064,
I find internal consistency with both sources of teaching.
Here are some pertinent quotes from the Lectures on Faith:

“2 We here observe that God is the only supreme governor, and independent being, in whom all fulness and perfection dwells; who is omnipotent, omnipresent, and omnicient; without beginning of days or end of life; and that in him every good gift, and every good principle dwells; and that he is the Father of lights: In him the principle of faith dwells independently; and he is the object in whom the faith of all other rational and accountable beings centers, for life and salvation.”

18 Sixthly, That he is love.

19 An acquaintance with these attributes in the divine character, is essentially necessary, in order that the faith of any rational being can center in him for life and salvation. For if he did not, in the first instance, believe him to be God, that is, the creator and upholder of all things, he could not center his faith in him for life and salvation, for fear there should be a greater than he, who would thwart all his plans, and he, like the gods of the heathen, would be unable to fulfil his promises; but seeing he is God over all, from everlasting to everlasting, the creator and upholder of all things, no such fear can exist in the minds of those who put their trust in him, so that in this respect their faith can be without wavering."

“The God of heaven understanding most perfectly the constitution of human nature, and the weakness of man, knew what was necessary to be revealed, and what ideas must be planted in their minds in order that they might be enabled to exercise faith in him unto eternal life…to enable them to exercise faith in God, and through this means to be partakers of his glory.”

“They are the Father and the Son: The Father being a personage of spirit, glory and power: possessing all perfection and fulness: The Son, who was in the bosom of the Father, a personage of tabernacle, made, or fashioned like unto man, or being in the form and likeness of man, or, rather, man was formed after his likeness, and in his image;–he is also the express image and likeness of the personage of the Father: possessing all the fulness of the Father, or, the same fulness with the Father; being begotten of him, and was ordained from before the foundation of the world to be a propitiation for the sins of all those who should believe on his name, and is called the Son because of the flesh–and descended in suffering below that which man can suffer, or, in other words, suffered greater sufferings, and was exposed to more powerful contradictions than any man can be. But notwithstanding all this, he kept the law of God, and remained without sin:”

“As the Son partakes of the fulness of the Father through the Spirit, so the saints are, by the same Spirit, to be partakers of the same fulness, to enjoy the same glory; for as the Father and the Son are one, so in like manner the saints are to be one in them, through the love of the Father, the mediation of Jesus Christ, and the gift of the Holy Spirit; they are to be heirs of God and joint heirs with Jesus Christ.”

“11 All the saints of whom we have account in all the revelations of God which are extant, obtained the knowledge which they had of their acceptance in his sight, through the sacrifice which they offered unto him: and through the knowledge thus obtained, their faith became sufficiently strong to lay hold upon the promise of eternal life, and to endure us seeing him who is invisible; and were enabled, through faith, to combat the powers of darkness, contend against the wiles of the adversary, overcome the world, and obtain the end of their faith, even the salvation of their souls.”
“the Savior says, If you have faith as a grain of mustard seed, say to this mountain, remove, and it will remove; or say to that sycamine tree, Be ye plucked up and planted in the midst of the sea, and it shall obey you. Faith, then, works by words; and with these its mightiest works have been, and will be performed.”

“4 It surely will not be required of us to prove, that this is the principle upon which all eternity has acted and will act; for every reflecting mind must know, that it is by reason of this power that all the hosts of heaven perform their works of wonder, majesty and glory:”

“When men begin to live by faith they begin to draw near to God; and when faith is perfected they are like him; and because he is saved they are saved also; for they will be in the same situation he is in, because they have come to him; and when he appears they shall be like him, for they will see him as he is.”
 
Continuation from the Lectures on Faith:

"And what constitutes the real difference between a saved person and one not saved, is the difference in the degree of their faith: one’s faith has become perfect enough to lay hold upon eternal life, and the other’s has not. But to be a little more particular, let us ask, where shall we find a prototype into whose likeness we may be assimulated, in order that we may be made partakers of life and salvation? or in other words, where shall we find a saved being? for if we can find a saved being, we may ascertain, without much difficulty, what all others must be, in order to be saved - they must be like that individual or they cannot be saved: we think, that it will not be a matter of dispute, that two beings, who are unlike each other, cannot both be saved; for whatever constitutes the salvation of one, will constitute the salvation of every creature which will be saved: and if we find one saved being in all existence, we may see what all others must be, or else not be saved.

We ask, then, where is the prototype? or where is the saved being? We conclude as to the answer of this question there will be no dispute among those who believe the bible, that it is Christ: all will agree in this that he is the prototype or standard of salvation, or in other words, that he is a saved being. And if we should continue our interogation, and ask how it is that he is saved, the answer would be, because he is
a just and holy being; and if he were any thing different from what he is he would not be saved; for his salvation depends on his being precisely what he is and nothing else; for if it were possible for him to change in the least degree, so sure he would fail of salvation and lose all his dominion, power, authority and glory, which constitutes salvation; for salvation consists in the glory, authority, majesty, power and dominion which Jehovah possesses, and in nothing else; and no being can possess it but himself or one like him: Thus says John, in his first epistle, 3:2 and 3: Behold, now we are the sons of God, and it doth not appear what we shall be; but we know, that when he shall appear we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is. And any man that has this hope in him purifies himself, even as he is pure.–Why purify himself as he is pure? because, if they do not they cannot be like him."

“If any should ask why all these sayings? the answer is to be found from what is before quoted from John’s epistle, that when he (the Lord) shall appear, the saints will be like him: and if they are not holy, as he is holy, and perfect as he is perfect, they cannot be like him; for no being can enjoy his glory without possessing his perfections and holiness, no more than they could reign in his kingdom without his power.”
 
If there is internal consistency then why were they removed as Scripture?
 
If there is internal consistency then why were they removed as Scripture?
Technically, Mormons never canonized the Lectures on Faith. They were included as explanation rather than scripture, but they do give a good summary of what Mormons believed in the mid-1830s.
 
If there is internal consistency then why were they removed as Scripture?
Religio,
As Catholic20064 noted, the Lectures on Faith were never “cannonized” although at one time they were printed with the Doctrine and Covenants, as I have read though never seen a copy. Nor has the King Follett Discourse been “cannonized.” That’s why I only use those sources when I am challenged about what beliefs are taught in them. I much prefer using the scriptures as sources for understanding what God wants us to know in order to progress in this life.
 
However, we as Catholics are also supposed to believe in Purgatory, where most of us poor sinners will end up. Somehow, I don’t envision my Mother who recently died as being in Purgatory, but rather in Heaven watching over me. Also, I don’t really think either Catholics or Mormons really know what is going to happen after death. According to the Bible, there’s a disconnect between going to heaven or hell - either at the time of our death, or on Judgement Day. But as humans, we would prefer to think that our loved ones are in Heaven waiting for us to join them when we die.
Christine,
I want you to know that I feel strongly that your mother is in a peaceful, joyful place as a spirit where she does indeed “watch over you” and is solicitous for your welfare. I feel that she has much to be pleased about in watching her daughter. I conclude that my truly felt gratitude for your kindnesses in this forum is miniscule in comparison with her gratitude for your abundant life and for all you do. I feel spiritually “in tune” in telling you these things, as they are impressions I have had and have prayed about today after reading your post.

So in short, I am confident that you are pretty much correct in how you “envision” your mother’s life right now, though there is more to “heaven” than the “paradise” of the spirit world. (My only reason for so saying is to give you a reason to be at peace about whether her situation would be “purgatory”–I feel that the answer is “absolutely not”.)
 
Religio,
As Catholic20064 noted, the Lectures on Faith were never “cannonized” although at one time they were printed with the Doctrine and Covenants, as I have read though never seen a copy. Nor has the King Follett Discourse been “cannonized.” That’s why I only use those sources when I am challenged about what beliefs are taught in them. I much prefer using the scriptures as sources for understanding what God wants us to know in order to progress in this life.
this is what the current D&C says about LoF:
*Beginning with the 1835 edition a series of seven theological lessons was also included; these were titled the “Lectures on Faith.” These had been prepared for use in the School of the Prophets in Kirtland, Ohio, in 1834-1835. Although profitable for doctrine and instruction, these lectures have been omitted from the Doctrine and Covenants since the 1921 edition because they were not given or presented as revelations to the whole Church. *

that i think makes them fair game…as to KFD…numerous LDS “prophets” have confirmed that it’s definitely doctrine.

The sola scriptura approach to mormonism appears to be a poor fit as the main basis of LDS theology is the need for prophets to not only reveal ongoing scripture but to apply existing. LDS scriptures in fact contradict this approach and place the instructions of prophets and apostles on the same level as scripture
 
this is what the current D&C says about LoF:
*Beginning with the 1835 edition a series of seven theological lessons was also included; these were titled the “Lectures on Faith.” These had been prepared for use in the School of the Prophets in Kirtland, Ohio, in 1834-1835. Although profitable for doctrine and instruction, these lectures have been omitted from the Doctrine and Covenants since the 1921 edition because they were not given or presented as revelations to the whole Church. *

that i think makes them fair game…as to KFD…numerous LDS “prophets” have confirmed that it’s definitely doctrine.

The sola scriptura approach to mormonism appears to be a poor fit as the main basis of LDS theology is the need for prophets to not only reveal ongoing scripture but to apply existing. LDS scriptures in fact contradict this approach and place the instructions of prophets and apostles on the same level as scripture
Majick275,
Thanks for noting the importance the LDS places on modern prophets and apostles and their teachings. I love their teachings, and use them in my life. I also feel more spiritually “in tune” personally when I study the scriptures as well as studying and listening to the words of the modern prophets and apostles. When I talked about “in order to progress in this life,” I meant that for all people everywhere, not just LDS. So if your scripture is just the Bible, then I meant that the Bible is the most important book you should read to progress in this life, and for me and my family, the scriptures you would be familiar with as our “four standard works” are the most important books we should read. But again, I am very grateful for the teachings of the modern prophets and apostles, also.

(I might as well preclude “what about’s” that have already come up many times, by saying that I haven’t agreed with every word attributed to every latter-day prophet or apostle in every piece of writing, by any means.)
 
Christine,
I want you to know that I feel strongly that your mother is in a peaceful, joyful place as a spirit where she does indeed “watch over you” and is solicitous for your welfare. I feel that she has much to be pleased about in watching her daughter. I conclude that my truly felt gratitude for your kindnesses in this forum is miniscule in comparison with her gratitude for your abundant life and for all you do. I feel spiritually “in tune” in telling you these things, as they are impressions I have had and have prayed about today after reading your post.

So in short, I am confident that you are pretty much correct in how you “envision” your mother’s life right now, though there is more to “heaven” than the “paradise” of the spirit world. (My only reason for so saying is to give you a reason to be at peace about whether her situation would be “purgatory”–I feel that the answer is “absolutely not”.)
Thank you Parker, you are truly a fine good person, and your words are very comforting to me.
 
Majick275,
Thanks for noting the importance the LDS places on modern prophets and apostles and their teachings. I love their teachings, and use them in my life. I also feel more spiritually “in tune” personally when I study the scriptures as well as studying and listening to the words of the modern prophets and apostles. When I talked about “in order to progress in this life,” I meant that for all people everywhere, not just LDS. So if your scripture is just the Bible, then I meant that the Bible is the most important book you should read to progress in this life, and for me and my family, the scriptures you would be familiar with as our “four standard works” are the most important books we should read. But again, I am very grateful for the teachings of the modern prophets and apostles, also.

(I might as well preclude “what about’s” that have already come up many times, by saying that I haven’t agreed with every word attributed to every latter-day prophet or apostle in every piece of writing, by any means.)
that pretty much puts you in the mainstream of mormonism with the vast majority of the LDS church members.
 
However, we as Catholics are also supposed to believe in Purgatory, where most of us poor sinners will end up. Somehow, I don’t envision my Mother who recently died as being in Purgatory, but rather in Heaven watching over me. Also, I don’t really think either Catholics or Mormons really know what is going to happen after death. According to the Bible, there’s a disconnect between going to heaven or hell - either at the time of our death, or on Judgement Day. But as humans, we would prefer to think that our loved ones are in Heaven waiting for us to join them when we die.
I agree that we don’t fully know what Heaven, Hell, or Purgatory will be like. However Mormons do believe that those that are saved and go to spirit Paradise will be spirit missionaries, going to the spirit Prison and preaching the Gospel of Jesus Christ to those souls.

"1021 Death puts an end to human life as the time open to either accepting or rejecting the divine grace manifested in Christ.590 The New Testament speaks of judgment primarily in its aspect of the final encounter with Christ in his second coming, but also repeatedly affirms that each will be rewarded immediately after death in accordance with his works and faith. The parable of the poor man Lazarus and the words of Christ on the cross to the good thief, as well as other New Testament texts speak of a final destiny of the soul–a destiny which can be different for some and for others.591 "
 
I agree that we don’t fully know what Heaven, Hell, or Purgatory will be like. However Mormons do believe that those that are saved and go to spirit Paradise will be spirit missionaries, going to the spirit Prison and preaching the Gospel of Jesus Christ to those souls.

"1021 Death puts an end to human life as the time open to either accepting or rejecting the divine grace manifested in Christ.590 The New Testament speaks of judgment primarily in its aspect of the final encounter with Christ in his second coming, but also repeatedly affirms that each will be rewarded immediately after death in accordance with his works and faith. The parable of the poor man Lazarus and the words of Christ on the cross to the good thief, as well as other New Testament texts speak of a final destiny of the soul–a destiny which can be different for some and for others.591 "
Christine and Religio71,
I think I want to clarify something based on Religio’s recent post here. When I said that my impression is that Christine’s mother is in a place of peace and joy, I did not mean a place that would be called “spirit Prison”. I meant that in and of herself (through Christ), because of her faith and her sincere belief in Christ and her actions consistent with her beliefs (which comes across in how Christine interacts with the world–like mother, like daughter), she is in “Paradise.” I have no idea whether she would be interested in “spirit missionaries”, but that doesn’t matter as to the question of where she is based on the goodness of her life.

She can interact with her loved ones who died before her or after her and who lived the kind of life she did, and she can observe her daughter and be a sort of “cheerleader” there for her. The important thing is, she is not in “prison”, she is in a peaceful, wonderful place still learning as much as she wants to learn (that goes on there also, more than just in a religious sense) and experiencing spiritual peace.

Thanks, Religio, for bringing up the concept of “spirit missionaries” (which is true), but I hope my comment clarifies that I firmly feel that “spirit Prison” is for those who were unrepentant in this life and did not claim the blessings of exercising faith in Christ and in the power of His redemption.
 
For whomever has read this thread,
I have had the impression this morning that I would not feel comfortable standing in the presence of the Apostle John (which I hope to do someday) without having pointed out the following impression related to the words “joint heir”:

John would want it to be understood that he knew the precise connotation of the words “joint heir” and the word “throne”, and he used those words knowing exactly what they meant in the real world. “Heir” means “the recipient of the promised inheritance.” “Joint” means “together with.” “Throne” means “kingship throne.” A joint heir receives the same inheritance as the rightful Sonship heir. How could John have said it more clearly? Why does one think he repeatedly said, “He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith.”?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top