LDS: Please provide proof that the priesthood authority was taken from the earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter lax16
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
SteveVH,

No, nor at home, but Rebecca J’s explanation is accurate and most LDS adults are familiar enough with the Lord’s prayer that it is “memorized” by the time of adulthood. (I was busy yesterday and didn’t have time to look at your post earlier.)
Thanks. I don’t think anyone would disagree that there is always a danger in someone just repeating words without giving them any thought. You get back what you put into it. However, if you truly contemplate the words of Jesus Himself as the prayer is said, the depth of this prayer is quite extraordinary and becomes your own prayer if prayed from the heart. It is, in fact, the perfect prayer and much more than just a pattern to follow.

God bless.
 
Thanks. I don’t think anyone would disagree that there is always a danger in someone just repeating words without giving them any thought. You get back what you put into it. However, if you truly contemplate the words of Jesus Himself as the prayer is said, the depth of this prayer is quite extraordinary and becomes your own prayer if prayed from the heart. It is, in fact, the perfect prayer and much more than just a pattern to follow.

God bless.
It is a most sacred prayer of the Church. In the Early Church it was not taught to catechumens until the day of their baptism. I think LDS have a longing and appreciation for the sacred (as we all do). If they could view it in this light while praying it, they would have that kind of appreciation for it being a profound personal prayer, one taught to us by Our Lord, and much more than a pattern to follow.
 
It is not recited because they think memorized and recited prayer falls under “vain repetition”. (But, they do use them, is the puzzling thing.)

Mormons value the Lord’s Prayer very highly. (To their benefit, they value prayer itself very highly.) Even though it is not encouraged to memorize as a prayer to be recited, I am not aware of any Mormon who doesn’t know it by heart. In my conversion from atheism to Catholicism, it is the only prayer I knew at Mass, and I hadn’t prayed at all for a couple of decades. Yet, I still remembered the Lord’s Prayer. The idea that you could actually pray it, anytime, was foreign to me.

Anyway, their teaching is that it is a pattern of prayer to follow, not something to be memorized and repeated.

Also, since they use the KJV Bible exclusively (for English speakers), they believe the language used is the “language of prayer”, and so switch into a quasi-KJV language when praying. Thee, thou, thine, doest, knowest, etc. (There are Catholic prayers, such as Hail Mary, that do the same thing.)

🙂

PS: To any Mormons, this is not a criticism of how you pray.
Their repetitive prayers are all hymns accept for baptism, communion, and some parts of Temple worship. They consider the Lord’s prayer a pattern of how to pray rather than a prayer to be recited itself, but they do – as I’ve cited – consider hymns are prayers, and consider that as inviolable scripture.

I still pray with “The, thou, thy, and thine”. What is intersting about the language of prayer is that LDS leaders often present it as the need to use respectful language, but those terms are not terms of higher respect at all. I’ve had Christian friends ask why I pray so formally, and I have to explain that it is not formal at all.

“The , thou, thy, and thine” are second person familiar form in English – before using that form fell out of common use, it was how adults would speak to freinds, or how close affectioned friends would speak to each other, and that is what it really reflects. {ersoanlly I think that using them without that personal awareness of what you are saying is as mucha vain repetition as repeating any words you do not understand. If someone feels less formal using our more modern expressions, that is the way we speak now. These are just the terms I learned to use, and since that is how I perceive them, when I express my own prayers that is the terminology I use.
 
In the exact wording used:

(Helaman 5:12) And now, my sons, remember, remember that it is upon the rock of our Redeemer, who is Christ, the Son of God, that ye must build your foundation; that when the devil shall send forth his mighty winds, yea, his shafts in the whirlwind, yea, when all his hail and his mighty storm shall beat upon you, it shall have no power over you to drag you down to the gulf of misery and endless wo, because of the rock upon which ye are built, which is a sure foundation, a foundation whereon if men build they cannot fall.

HI,
In simple language, what is said here? For example, what is meant by the gulf of misery and endless wo? What is meant by it shall have no power…? What does cannot fall mean??? What does build your foundation mean???
Teach me.
To me, this looks like, in my language, ‘Jesus prevents the devil from having any power over you, if you rely on Him.’ Yet, I have just guessed at the meaning of those passages in Helaman 5:12. I do not know at all if I am even close.
If I can understand what is actually being said here, it would be helpful.
 
Their repetitive prayers are all hymns accept for baptism, communion, and some parts of Temple worship.
My adult daughter, who I raised atheist and has never been taught a single prayer, knows the Mormon “blessing on the food” by heart. Only because she’s heard it her entire life when we are at family gatherings.
 
My adult daughter, who I raised atheist and has never been taught a single prayer, knows the Mormon “blessing on the food” by heart. Only because she’s heard it her entire life when we are at family gatherings.
That is a good example, because there is no proscribed “Blessing on the Food”. Like all other prayers, it is expected to be spontatneous. But there is only so much to say. It usually starts out, “Hevenly father, we than thee for this food…” and it may diverge from there but peole tend to say pretty much the same thing each time, so it might as well be written down. There was also the morning prayer, “Hevenly father, We Thank thee for this day …”

I find that prayers like the Lord’s parayer help me to focus before I express my own ideas. I do think there’s an impression among most Mormons that Catholics ONLY pray proscribed prayers. Here’s an article I stumbled upon called , “It’s not rote just because someone else wrote it.”

integratedcatholiclife.org/2011/02/its-not-rote-just-because-someone-else-wrote-it/
 
From Daniel Peterson, Mormon apologist:
Quote:
Mormonism declares that the original Christian church fell into apostasy. What is the best evidence for that claim? The fact that there was a restoration. The historical evidence for an apostasy is, in my judgment, excellent. But God’s restoration of the church and the gospel proves it.
The complete article is here:
mormontimes.com/article/19759/Mormonism-relies-on-historical-events
By that reasoning the proof that there were UFO ships in Area 51 is that once people started talking about it they moved it someplace else.

The article complete the circular reasoning bu beginning with a recitation of St. Thomas Aquinas. Follow that reasoning, Thomas aquinas repesented and defended an apostate organization, but I will cite him as a Christian authority. Can’t have it both ways.

If there was a need for a Restoration, Aquinas wasted his lefe, so there is no need to even revere Him as a great scholar. If Christianity was corrupt and had no valid authority, Aquinas perverted the use of reason to advance a fraud, and there is no reason to even consider him a great philosopher.

If he was a great philosopher, and you affirm that the what he defended was false,and beleive it was replaced by a “restoration”, you sever yourself from Aquinas’ legacy.

Of course that comes back to topic: If Aquinas has some value to cite for Mormon, than the alleged Apostasy must not have been complete by his day. That means the authority was still here until at least the 13th Century.
 
Actually, there are Mormons who have done that:

theremnantchurch.com/

restorationchurch.net/default.asp?active_page_id=1

Those are only two of them among many.
Quite interesting. the second is actually a second generation splinter group. After the LDS Schism dsicussed vehemently and at length earlier, the second largest group in the divided congregation of the followers of Joseph Smith was the Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, now called “The Community of Christ”. Around 1958 some “Reorganites” (as Mormons call them) broke from their church and formed the Remnant Church of Christ of Latter-day Saints, affirming that their splinter group had in turn apostasized, and the authority remained with them.

Even while Joseph Smith was alive high level Church officials split away declaring him a fallen prophet. Sometimes it happened over trivial persoanl matters, Sometimes it happened over big things, like polygamy.
 
My adult daughter, who I raised atheist and has never been taught a single prayer, knows the Mormon “blessing on the food” by heart. Only because she’s heard it her entire life when we are at family gatherings.
Yes, I have heard these many times as well. We always thought it somewhat funny that they would say “thank you for this food that nourishes our bodies” and they are serving sugar cookies and Tang! (usually at church events) 😛
 
Yes, I have heard these many times as well. We always thought it somewhat funny that they would say “thank you for this food that nourishes our bodies” and they are serving sugar cookies and Tang! (usually at church events) 😛
Yes, Mormons joke about this as well. 🙂
 
Yes, I have heard these many times as well. We always thought it somewhat funny that they would say “thank you for this food that nourishes our bodies” and they are serving sugar cookies and Tang! (usually at church events) 😛
:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:
You’re right! I heard that most of my life and never thought anything of it!👍
 
Yes, I have heard these many times as well. We always thought it somewhat funny that they would say “thank you for this food that nourishes our bodies” and they are serving sugar cookies and Tang! (usually at church events) 😛
I know I’ll hear about this from EVERYBODY – but wouldn’t that take a form of transsubstatiation?
 
ParkerD;7583318:
In the exact wording used:

(Helaman 5:12) And now, my sons, remember, remember that it is upon the rock of our Redeemer, who is Christ, the Son of God, that ye must build your foundation; that when the devil shall send forth his mighty winds, yea, his shafts in the whirlwind, yea, when all his hail and his mighty storm shall beat upon you, it shall have no power over you to drag you down to the gulf of misery and endless wo, because of the rock upon which ye are built, which is a sure foundation, a foundation whereon if men build they cannot fall.
HI,
In simple language, what is said here? For example, what is meant by the gulf of misery and endless wo? What is meant by it shall have no power…? What does cannot fall mean??? What does build your foundation mean???
Teach me.
To me, this looks like, in my language, ‘Jesus prevents the devil from having any power over you, if you rely on Him.’ Yet, I have just guessed at the meaning of those passages in Helaman 5:12. I do not know at all if I am even close.
If I can understand what is actually being said here, it would be helpful.

Hello, Curtish1947,

That “gulf” is symbolic of “hell,” as you may have guessed.

“It” refers back to the kinds of storms and shafts that the devil sends out into the world to drag all people down or to distract them from doing the will of God in their lives, and from hearing the voice of the Good Shepherd–who is the Rock of our salvation and should be the foundation of our faith.

“Cannot fall” means that even though a person will have trials, temptations, and be scorned by others in this life, because they know the voice of the Good Shepherd and are firmly committed because of having made covenants and feeling powerfully influenced to be able to keep those covenants, through the strengthening and enlightening influence of the Holy Ghost, they will not fall prey to the trials and temptations but will stand firm in doing what’s right, including repenting as they also make mistakes. So it doesn’t mean they will never make a mistake–it means they repent of their mistakes and keep growing, and have Christ as the foundation for that growth.

Jesus doesn’t “prevent the devil from having power over you” if by that you mean He pushes the devil out of the way. It means that even though the devil still tries, his tries are in vain because you know better than to fall prey to his attempts to deceive, to ensnare, to entangle, and to discourage. Christ stands by you in all this, but it’s still a joint effort the person needs to make with Christ’s help and with Him as the foundational support during the process of living and “making it through the storms.”
 
Lax16,

I’m going to pass on answering most of your latest set of questions. The Bible is the Bible and is the word of God. The LDS believe the Bible to be the word of God, including that Christ is the Only Begotten Son of Heavenly Father. The creed you quoted has many language use variations from actual Biblical expressions about most of those subjects. This can be easily studied using Bible word search tools.

As far as the following:
It is about a personal relationship, and it is also about relationships with others that become redefined and enlivened through each having a personal relationship with the living Christ.
I was intending to be understood to be talking about relationships with others such as with family, friends, or even enemies. Those relationships become redefined because there is so much more love, forgiveness, empathy, compassion, gentleness, meekness, gratitude, humility, and patience that the relationships are no longer the same. This happens as people “put on Christ” and let Him be involved in their life, and as they repent, change, and grow.

My hope is that the LDS don’t exclusively experience these changes, and that others are enlivened in these ways also.
 
Lax16,

I’m going to pass on answering most of your latest set of questions. The Bible is the Bible and is the word of God. The LDS believe the Bible to be the word of God, including that Christ is the Only Begotten Son of Heavenly Father. The creed you quoted has many language use variations from actual Biblical expressions about most of those subjects. This can be easily studied using Bible word search tools.
Hi Parker - I am surprised you are choosing to pass on my questions.

The Bible is the Bible and is the word of God only as long as it is translated correctly, right?

Since you teach our creed is an abomination, I think you should explain why.

How can Christ be the only begotten Son - LDS teach that we are also the spirit children of God and that lucifer is Jesus’ brother. Therefore, Jesus is not an only son.

There is nothing in the creed that is not bibilical and the Protestants would agree with it as well, for the most part.
 
Hi Parker - I am surprised you are choosing to pass on my questions.
He has not responded to the OP, so I’m not surprised. In fact he also said he was refusing to answer your OP. It demonstrates the weakness of the Mormon position in a rational discussion of the subject.
 
He has not responded to the OP, so I’m not surprised. In fact he also said he was refusing to answer your OP. It demonstrates the weakness of the Mormon position in a rational discussion of the subject.
Stephen168,

I responded to the OP, but just not in the way you liked. Your last sentence illustrates quite succinctly the difference between “rational theology” and “revealed theology.” You seem to want a “rational discussion” so that it will be evident to the rational mind, yet Paul wrote about that very thing and said “don’t do it,” in so many words.

This was why I was glad when the subject of having an ongoing conversation with Christ came up, since of course He is interested in answering such a question, but not by forcing the issue with “proof” to the rational mind. He doesn’t take away free will choice using “rational proof”. Just because people use rational proof to guide their own religious choices, does not mean He wanted them to do that. He told Peter exactly the opposite of doing that.

I will respond to Lax16 tonight when I have the time since the issue has been pressed, but it would be far better for someone to take such questions and be introspective with their personal search about answers to those questions, using the Bible as the source of the personal search, plus introspection.

Peace.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top