LDS Question - How did the first church fail?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Xavierlives
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Rinnie,

With all the evidences of the Apostasy, the Holly Spirit left! I also explained the word “end of times” meaning a finite period meaning “period”, “epoch”…it comes from the Greek word “aion” and it does not mean forever! The iniquity and corruption of the church caused the Holly Spirit to withdraw from it!
Yes, I know what your are trying to say but you refuse to say it. SO lets not beat around the bush because just say it are you calling Jesus a liar or not? Simple question Evan. Just answer it. Because either Jesus lied or you are.
 
I have and they do not address my questions at all - nor do they agree with Apostolic teaching. 🤷
Jay53,

I think you admit that Jesus Christ lived as a spiritual being before He was born on this earth. Do you agree that his body had a beginning? In other words, did He always have a body? No! It is LDS doctrine that Jesus Christ’s spirit also had a beginning. Then you ask, but how can He be the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Eternal God? Well, it is our theology that Jesus Christ and all children of God had an intelligence before they acquired their Spiritual and Physical body. This intelligence always existed and they were not made. We do not believe in “creation ex-nihilo”. God did not create matter. Matter always existed. In other words, we all co-exist with God!

A God is a God in spiritual, physical or as intelligence (light and truth) stage. As far as the how the “heavenly mother” came to existence; that should explain it! We do not have more revelation on the subject, so I don’t want to speculate. Apostolic teachings from the Bible do not contain all truth! Jesus and the Apostles stated that they knew things that were not written and should not be divulged to the church as a whole at that time!
 
Rebecca,

Jesus is the Only Beggoten of the Father in the flesh, but in the spirit we are all begotten of the “father of spirits” and we all are gods living as mortals!
No were ARE not. None of our are gods. THere is only one God not many gods. False gods maybe. But there is only one GOd. GOD FROM GOD LIGHT FROM LIGHT TRUE GOD FROM TRUE GOD ONE IN BEING WITH THE FATHER THROUGH HIM ALL THINGS WERE MADE. By the Power of the HOLY SPIRIT he BECAME MAN.,
 
No were ARE not. None of our are gods. THere is only one God not many gods. False gods maybe. But there is only one GOd. GOD FROM GOD LIGHT FROM LIGHT TRUE GOD FROM TRUE GOD ONE IN BEING WITH THE FATHER THROUGH HIM ALL THINGS WERE MADE. By the Power of the HOLY SPIRIT he BECAME MAN.,
Rinnie,

We also are gods that became man! Please note the difference between God and god!
 
The iniquity and corruption of the church caused the Holly Spirit to withdraw from it!
Well, there is no question that the history of the RCC (as well as that of other Christians groups) contain many instances of corruption and iniquity. Afterall, we are talking about organizations made up of fallible human beings. (Not that this excuses the behavior.) And it seems to me that the bigger the organizations get, the more opportunity exists for corporate bad behavior.

However, there seems to be a subtle implication here that somehow the LDS movement doesn’t have these kinds of problems AND won’t have them in the future, AND, even more subtly implied, is that because of this, the HS will continue to dwell within that organization.

Quite frankly, the LDS faith has such a short history compared to the RCC or even the Protestants that it is hard to make a fair comparison when it comes to “corporate” wrongdoing. Of course there is going to be way more history for the former groups, and much less for the latter simply because they’ve been around longer. And, of course, the history of mainstream Christianity is going to look much worse…

I’d very much like to look into a “parallel universe” in which the LDS Church has had 2000 years of history under its belt, and the same number of adherents as Catholics…🍿
 
Rinnie,

We also are gods that became man! Please note the difference between God and god!
no evan you are wrong. I AM THE LORD YOUR GOD THERE SHALL BE NO OTHER GODS BEFORE ME.!! We are not gods evan we are sinners,
 
Paul C,

I am aware of those statements, but these are not all canonical pronouncements. A Prophet is a Prophet only when acting as such. Not every word from a Prophet is considered scriptures. Journal of Discourses is not recognized as an authoritative source. Prophets and Apostles may give their opinion and may speculate as any of us do. The Apostle Paul is an example of that. He stated his opinion too and is clearly recorded in the Bible!

Mormons do not accept all the statements above as official doctrine. Adam is Michael the Archangel, but he is not Elohim our Heavenly Father. We do not have a definitive revelation saying that God was once a man as we are, but we can infer that based on the doctrine stated in Psalms 82:6 and John 10:34 that we are gods. The statement about Mary is also Brigham Young’s opnion, which is not shared by the oficial cannon of the Church.
Thank you for your clarification.
 
Jay53,

I think you admit that Jesus Christ lived as a spiritual being before He was born on this earth. Do you agree that his body had a beginning? In other words, did He always have a body? No! It is LDS doctrine that Jesus Christ’s spirit also had a beginning. Then you ask, but how can He be the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Eternal God? Well, it is our theology that Jesus Christ and all children of God had an intelligence before they acquired their Spiritual and Physical body. This intelligence always existed and they were not made. We do not believe in “creation ex-nihilo”. God did not create matter. Matter always existed. In other words, we all co-exist with God!

A God is a God in spiritual, physical or as intelligence (light and truth) stage. As far as the how the “heavenly mother” came to existence; that should explain it! We do not have more revelation on the subject, so I don’t want to speculate. Apostolic teachings from the Bible do not contain all truth! Jesus and the Apostles stated that they knew things that were not written and should not be divulged to the church as a whole at that time!
Jesus existed before He became Incarnate because HE IS GOD!!! That is where your theology is flat out wrong. Jesus is God, not some “intelligence” who acquired a spiritual or physical body. And this theory/teaching of yours is nowhere in the teachings of the Apostles.

Your explanation that God did not create matter and that matter always existed makes absolutely no sense to me. I believe that God: Father, Son and Holy Spirit (as One) always existed, but God is the Creator of all things. How in the world can “matter” exist without God creating it? How can God be greater than “matter” if they have always existed together? Or if, by matter, you mean all of us in “intelligence form” before we had physical bodies, then how is God greater than us, particularly if you believe that God was once a man like us? I don’t even know what questions to ask, I’m so confused by this thinking. :confused:

I think this is where our understandings differ greatly, particularly in your last paragraph. “A God is a God”. That thinking is totally wrong. God is not “a God”. He is God - is, was and always shall be, no beginning and no end.

And you still haven’t explained anything about this “heavenly mother” or given any evidence that the Apostles believed in anything resembling that doctrine. Saying that the Apostles knew this and just didn’t divulge it is not even a slightly convincing argument. I agree that they said that not everything was written, but I don’t believe they ever said there were doctrines or Truths that should not be divulged. Some evidence of that would be appreciated.
 
Rinnie,

With all the evidences of the Apostasy, the Holly Spirit left! I also explained the word “end of times” meaning a finite period meaning “period”, “epoch”…it comes from the Greek word “aion” and it does not mean forever! The iniquity and corruption of the church caused the Holly Spirit to withdraw from it!
You do realize, Evan, that this is your personal interpretation (or perhaps the Mormon interpretation) of this reading. It is inconsistent with what the Catholic church has understood for 2000 years. The Holy spirit would not abandon the Church Christ founded. Do you really think Christ failed and that he needed Joseph Smith to bail him out be restarting Christianity the “right” way?
 
Jay53,

I think you admit that Jesus Christ lived as a spiritual being before He was born on this earth. Do you agree that his body had a beginning? In other words, did He always have a body? No! It is LDS doctrine that Jesus Christ’s spirit also had a beginning. Then you ask, but how can He be the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Eternal God? Well, it is our theology that Jesus Christ and all children of God had an intelligence before they acquired their Spiritual and Physical body. This intelligence always existed and they were not made. We do not believe in “creation ex-nihilo”. God did not create matter. Matter always existed. In other words, we all co-exist with God!

A God is a God in spiritual, physical or as intelligence (light and truth) stage. As far as the how the “heavenly mother” came to existence; that should explain it! We do not have more revelation on the subject, so I don’t want to speculate. Apostolic teachings from the Bible do not contain all truth! Jesus and the Apostles stated that they knew things that were not written and should not be divulged to the church as a whole at that time!
This sounds like an extremely convoluted explanation of scripture. How is an intelligence different than a spirit? And Jesus said God the father is spirit. - how do you make him a physical being. How could matter always exist without a maker?

And sure, all truth is not recorded in scripture, but everything in scripture is true. There are things you believe that can not be reconciled with Scripture. Things like Joseph Smith’s adultery and polygamy can not be reconciled with the fullness of scripture. Your denial of the real presence in the eucharist can not be reconciled with scripture. Your view of the virgin birth can not be reconciled with scripture. And it only starts there.
 
This sounds like an extremely convoluted explanation of scripture. How is an intelligence different than a spirit? And Jesus said God the father is spirit. - how do you make him a physical being. How could matter always exist without a maker?

And sure, all truth is not recorded in scripture, but everything in scripture is true. There are things you believe that can not be reconciled with Scripture. Things like Joseph Smith’s adultery and polygamy can not be reconciled with the fullness of scripture. Your denial of the real presence in the eucharist can not be reconciled with scripture. Your view of the virgin birth can not be reconciled with scripture. And it only starts there.
Off topic, but what view of the virgin birth? How can they possibly twist that one around?
 
As for the apostasy in Christianity today (or 180 years ago) I just don’t see it. If there were apostasy, then we would not see the Holy Spirit. We would see Christians living as the world lives. There would be no line between what is of the world and what is of God’s (or, more candidly, it would be all of the world and no God). I just fail to see that. Because I fail to see that, I again find more fault with your truth. Your truth wants the world to believe that God sent his message but that message failed. The truth is, that message did not fail before Christ and has not failed after Christ. The Holy Spirit is here now as it has been. So a distortion of that message is a distorting of the truth, which is a lie.
Hi, again, Xavierlives,
(Note to others–you can carry on with your other conversations–sorry to “interrupt.”)

Good people are doing good things–that is absolutely true, and many of those good things have been “improved upon” by the application of the truths of the gospel of Jesus Christ, taught by Him and by the apostles. Many truths were also taught by Moses, and they are lived with good results by many, many people.

The Old Testament taught repentance, change for the better, forgiveness, loving God, loving others, the atonement of Christ that was to come, resurrection, marriage given by God to humankind as a blessing, honesty, honoring parents, Sabbath observance as a day of rest, chastity, being content with one’s own blessings from God, the importance of parents teaching their children, the importance of prophets, the importance of righteous leaders, and so forth.

The New Testament expanded on those teachings, and focused on the saving grace of Jesus Christ. It also showed that there were important keys for authority given to man to act in the name of God, and also important understanding to gaining knowledge through the Holy Spirit. It also warned (as did the Old Testament) that there was drifting from true doctrine going on all the time, among the people and among the teachers/leaders.

The teachers/leaders seek by their own nature (human nature) to protect their “status quo”.

But the promise of the Holy Spirit and of the gifts of Christ were never tied to a religion–they were tied to having faith and living the commandments. So of course many, many people can have the Holy Spirit guiding them, and can have the gifts of Christ and the fruits of living the gospel.

Still and all, God provided for a clear message about a “covenant people” in the Old Testament, and a return of that covenant people to His covenant during the end times, and also a clear message about a covenant people in the New Testament. These are different qualities: a covenant people lives by a “higher standard” than just living by the basics of the gospel, and they will effectively be led to build Zion–a real condition where the whole society is blessed in every conceivable way by God, because they have covenanted to follow Him and love Him with all their hearts. They can receive guidance of the Holy Spirit in everyday living–in how to serve others effectively without negating freedom of choice among those they serve (a difficult thing to do sometimes), in giving priesthood blessings to people (healing blessings), in teaching their children and receiving discernment about their children’s needs, and many other daily choices in life.

But yet, those who live the basics of the gospel will indeed be blessed in their lives, because the promises are tied to living by the principles. It is a choice everyone makes every day, if they have received those principles–“shall I live by the principles and thus receive the blessings?” (A question everyone basically needs to answer to themselves every day.) If they do, they’ll be blessed. If they don’t, they’ll miss out on some blessings they could have had, or could have brought to others.

So if you will understand that God has given someone such as yourself every blessing from the gospel that you choose to receive, then I don’t get why you would think that just because I am aware of “covenant blessings” that are available, that the fact that you choose not to care about such things does not mean you are not entitled to every blessing you seek and live for. Again, as I’ve written before, you get exactly what you have wanted, desired, and lived to receive, and they are blessings from God who gives in abundance.
 
You do realize, Evan, that this is your personal interpretation (or perhaps the Mormon interpretation) of this reading. It is inconsistent with what the Catholic church has understood for 2000 years. The Holy spirit would not abandon the Church Christ founded. Do you really think Christ failed and that he needed Joseph Smith to bail him out be restarting Christianity the “right” way?
See this is the thing, why won’t he come right out and say either Jesus lied or not. He refuses to play it straight with me but dances around it. We know the if the Holy Spirit did indeed abandon the Church then Jesus lied. Which we both know is impossible. Jesus would never lie to us. But he refuses to play it straight with us. And I do not know why. Why beat around the bush either say it, or agree with us. But he won;t. Because I believe deep down inside he knows he is wrong.
 
Off topic, but what view of the virgin birth? How can they possibly twist that one around?
In LDS teaching, Mary had sex with God the father, but they still say it was a virgin birth because the father was immortal and they only count mortal sex…
 
Paul C,

I am aware of those statements, but these are not all canonical pronouncements. A Prophet is a Prophet only when acting as such. Not every word from a Prophet is considered scriptures. Journal of Discourses is not recognized as an authoritative source. Prophets and Apostles may give their opinion and may speculate as any of us do. The Apostle Paul is an example of that. He stated his opinion too and is clearly recorded in the Bible!

Mormons do not accept all the statements above as official doctrine. Adam is Michael the Archangel, but he is not Elohim our Heavenly Father. We do not have a definitive revelation saying that God was once a man as we are, but we can infer that based on the doctrine stated in Psalms 82:6 and John 10:34 that we are gods. The statement about Mary is also Brigham Young’s opnion, which is not shared by the oficial cannon of the Church.
Is this the same journal where Joseph Smith taught about his “marriage arrangements” before it became part of the D&C? So it is okay for JS and his marriages, but not okay for other things? Who decides?
 
Hi, again, Xavierlives,
(Note to others–you can carry on with your other conversations–sorry to “interrupt.”)

Good people are doing good things–that is absolutely true, and many of those good things have been “improved upon” by the application of the truths of the gospel of Jesus Christ, taught by Him and by the apostles. Many truths were also taught by Moses, and they are lived with good results by many, many people.

The Old Testament taught repentance, change for the better, forgiveness, loving God, loving others, the atonement of Christ that was to come, resurrection, marriage given by God to humankind as a blessing, honesty, honoring parents, Sabbath observance as a day of rest, chastity, being content with one’s own blessings from God, the importance of parents teaching their children, the importance of prophets, the importance of righteous leaders, and so forth.

The New Testament expanded on those teachings, and focused on the saving grace of Jesus Christ. It also showed that there were important keys for authority given to man to act in the name of God, and also important understanding to gaining knowledge through the Holy Spirit. It also warned (as did the Old Testament) that there was drifting from true doctrine going on all the time, among the people and among the teachers/leaders.

The teachers/leaders seek by their own nature (human nature) to protect their “status quo”.

But the promise of the Holy Spirit and of the gifts of Christ were never tied to a religion–they were tied to having faith and living the commandments. So of course many, many people can have the Holy Spirit guiding them, and can have the gifts of Christ and the fruits of living the gospel.

Still and all, God provided for a clear message about a “covenant people” in the Old Testament, and a return of that covenant people to His covenant during the end times, and also a clear message about a covenant people in the New Testament. These are different qualities: a covenant people lives by a “higher standard” than just living by the basics of the gospel, and they will effectively be led to build Zion–a real condition where the whole society is blessed in every conceivable way by God, because they have covenanted to follow Him and love Him with all their hearts. They can receive guidance of the Holy Spirit in everyday living–in how to serve others effectively without negating freedom of choice among those they serve (a difficult thing to do sometimes), in giving priesthood blessings to people (healing blessings), in teaching their children and receiving discernment about their children’s needs, and many other daily choices in life.

But yet, those who live the basics of the gospel will indeed be blessed in their lives, because the promises are tied to living by the principles. It is a choice everyone makes every day, if they have received those principles–“shall I live by the principles and thus receive the blessings?” (A question everyone basically needs to answer to themselves every day.) If they do, they’ll be blessed. If they don’t, they’ll miss out on some blessings they could have had, or could have brought to others.

So if you will understand that God has given someone such as yourself every blessing from the gospel that you choose to receive, then I don’t get why you would think that just because I am aware of “covenant blessings” that are available, that the fact that you choose not to care about such things does not mean you are not entitled to every blessing you seek and live for. Again, as I’ve written before, you get exactly what you have wanted, desired, and lived to receive, and they are blessings from God who gives in abundance.
Parker,
My heart goes out to the Mormon’s who join the LDS for the good family values and the sense of community. But this comes at a great price because your religion is based on the lies of Joseph Smith and it pulls people away from the sacraments without which eternal life is very difficult if not impossible. After all, Jesus said in John 6, if you don’t eat my body and drink my blood, there is no life within you. This is because when we recieve Jesus in the Eucharist, he becomes part of us and he is the bread of life. You may think that you do these people a favor when you evangelize them. In reality, you are taking them away from the Body of Christ. And trust me, devout Catholics have even better family values and a sense of community that does not involve secret ceremonies and ostracizing non-members or people who have left the LDS.

You claim that Christ and his church failed, based on the unsubstantiated words of a convicted con artist and serial adulterer. Can’t you see from his life that God could not be with him? Can’t you see all the contradictions between LDS doctrine and the bible? And Can’t you see that Jesus is God and can not fail? He would never need a man the likes of Joseph Smith to clean up after him, reinvigorating the faith. And he would never have chosen a man who used his position to have sex with the wives and children of his followers. See the Truth. Repent, for your own good.
 
See this is the thing, why won’t he come right out and say either Jesus lied or not. He refuses to play it straight with me but dances around it. We know the if the Holy Spirit did indeed abandon the Church then Jesus lied. Which we both know is impossible. Jesus would never lie to us. But he refuses to play it straight with us. And I do not know why. Why beat around the bush either say it, or agree with us. But he won;t. Because I believe deep down inside he knows he is wrong.
Hi, Rinnie,
I hope you are well, and aren’t too buried in snow, and are staying warm. (I have relatives in Washington DC who have had it pretty cold–no power–due to the breaking branches in the snow.)

You’ve mentioned the same idea to me a few times, so I guess it’s OK if I respond.

Jesus, of course, told the truth always. He didn’t promise that the Holy Spirit would stay with the church, per se, but with the people who didn’t abandon Him–who lived to keep the Spirit. The Holy Spirit is something to keep with you, not assume you have and then go merrily on your way doing whatever you (that is, anyone who seeks the Spirit) chooses to do.

We make choices every day, and those choices lead in a direction, and if the Holy Spirit has guided our choice then it will have truly been a wonderful decision we have made to follow that guidance. Then, tomorrow or the next day or the next, we face a new decision–a new opportunity to have the Holy Spirit guide our decisions and actions, or not. But we are in the driver’s seat–not the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit does not force decisions upon us. Christ leads without force, and so does the Holy Spirit.

Have a peaceful night, and a wonderful day tomorrow, with much love in your heart.👍
 
Hi, Rinnie,
I hope you are well, and aren’t too buried in snow, and are staying warm. (I have relatives in Washington DC who have had it pretty cold–no power–due to the breaking branches in the snow.)

You’ve mentioned the same idea to me a few times, so I guess it’s OK if I respond.

Jesus, of course, told the truth always. He didn’t promise that the Holy Spirit would stay with the church, per se, but with the people who didn’t abandon Him–who lived to keep the Spirit. The Holy Spirit is something to keep with you, not assume you have and then go merrily on your way doing whatever you (that is, anyone who seeks the Spirit) chooses to do.

We make choices every day, and those choices lead in a direction, and if the Holy Spirit has guided our choice then it will have truly been a wonderful decision we have made to follow that guidance. Then, tomorrow or the next day or the next, we face a new decision–a new opportunity to have the Holy Spirit guide our decisions and actions, or not. But we are in the driver’s seat–not the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit does not force decisions upon us. Christ leads without force, and so does the Holy Spirit.

Have a peaceful night, and a wonderful day tomorrow, with much love in your heart.👍
Parker, you are distorting the truth. Jesus founded the Catholic Church and said the gates of hell would not prevail against it (Matthew 16: 16-19). Yet, you suggest that it did. You then further distort the truth and impugn all Catholics by saying they abandonned him. Don’t you realize how many Catholics were martyred for their faith? How did Catholics abandon God? Have you read about any of the Catholic Saints? how about Francis of Assissi? Do you think he abandonned God?

Yes, we make choices every day and those choices lead us to or away from God. The choices you make to pull people away from the life giving sacraments of the Catholic Church are not leading you or them toward God but away from him.
 
Hi, again, Xavierlives,
(Note to others–you can carry on with your other conversations–sorry to “interrupt.”)

Good people are doing good things–that is absolutely true, and many of those good things have been “improved upon” by the application of the truths of the gospel of Jesus Christ, taught by Him and by the apostles. Many truths were also taught by Moses, and they are lived with good results by many, many people.

The Old Testament taught repentance, change for the better, forgiveness, loving God, loving others, the atonement of Christ that was to come, resurrection, marriage given by God to humankind as a blessing, honesty, honoring parents, Sabbath observance as a day of rest, chastity, being content with one’s own blessings from God, the importance of parents teaching their children, the importance of prophets, the importance of righteous leaders, and so forth.

The New Testament expanded on those teachings, and focused on the saving grace of Jesus Christ. It also showed that there were important keys for authority given to man to act in the name of God, and also important understanding to gaining knowledge through the Holy Spirit. It also warned (as did the Old Testament) that there was drifting from true doctrine going on all the time, among the people and among the teachers/leaders.

The teachers/leaders seek by their own nature (human nature) to protect their “status quo”.

But the promise of the Holy Spirit and of the gifts of Christ were never tied to a religion–they were tied to having faith and living the commandments. So of course many, many people can have the Holy Spirit guiding them, and can have the gifts of Christ and the fruits of living the gospel.

Still and all, God provided for a clear message about a “covenant people” in the Old Testament, and a return of that covenant people to His covenant during the end times, and also a clear message about a covenant people in the New Testament. These are different qualities: a covenant people lives by a “higher standard” than just living by the basics of the gospel, and they will effectively be led to build Zion–a real condition where the whole society is blessed in every conceivable way by God, because they have covenanted to follow Him and love Him with all their hearts. They can receive guidance of the Holy Spirit in everyday living–in how to serve others effectively without negating freedom of choice among those they serve (a difficult thing to do sometimes), in giving priesthood blessings to people (healing blessings), in teaching their children and receiving discernment about their children’s needs, and many other daily choices in life.

But yet, those who live the basics of the gospel will indeed be blessed in their lives, because the promises are tied to living by the principles. It is a choice everyone makes every day, if they have received those principles–“shall I live by the principles and thus receive the blessings?” (A question everyone basically needs to answer to themselves every day.) If they do, they’ll be blessed. If they don’t, they’ll miss out on some blessings they could have had, or could have brought to others.

So if you will understand that God has given someone such as yourself every blessing from the gospel that you choose to receive, then I don’t get why you would think that just because I am aware of “covenant blessings” that are available, that the fact that you choose not to care about such things does not mean you are not entitled to every blessing you seek and live for. Again, as I’ve written before, you get exactly what you have wanted, desired, and lived to receive, and they are blessings from God who gives in abundance.
But Parker, it is not the blessings I choose, it is the blessings He chooses for me. It is not the principles I choose, but the principles He chooses for me. The danger is, if somebody (who shall remain nameless) changes things, changes the blessings, changes the principles, then is that not a lie? I’ve asked myself this a hundred times: Is there a harm in what the Mormons belieive? What is the ramification of that harm?

I’d like to think, no harm, no foul. I’d like to think that there are Mormons who truly have some relationship with the true Christ. The problem is, you have different definitions for everything. Your faith is systematically rewriting what the Bible “means” to fit your faith. When this happens, I get concerned. I get concerned for the converts who think they are going into another form of Christianity, but in reality, they are not. I do not know how God will judge these.

Now for the things like becoming gods. Jesus mentions this is in John and it has exploded from his meaning to something bizarre. The problem I see is, who does Christ say will be the greatest in heaven? The person who says he will be a god? No. The Person who says they will rule their own planet and have spiritual babies? No. The person proclaiming their exaltation is going to be in for a world of surprise.

As for me, I will be content, squeaking in as the gates are closing. I can say, I have made a terrible showing for what a Christian is supposed to look like and live like. I have failed more than I have succeeded. I have fumbled more than I have carried. But as long as I am in the game, I will continue to try.
 
But Parker, it is not the blessings I choose, it is the blessings He chooses for me. It is not the principles I choose, but the principles He chooses for me. The danger is, if somebody (who shall remain nameless) changes things, changes the blessings, changes the principles, then is that not a lie? I’ve asked myself this a hundred times: Is there a harm in what the Mormons belieive? What is the ramification of that harm?

I’d like to think, no harm, no foul. I’d like to think that there are Mormons who truly have some relationship with the true Christ. The problem is, you have different definitions for everything. Your faith is systematically rewriting what the Bible “means” to fit your faith. When this happens, I get concerned. I get concerned for the converts who think they are going into another form of Christianity, but in reality, they are not. I do not know how God will judge these.

Now for the things like becoming gods. Jesus mentions this is in John and it has exploded from his meaning to something bizarre. The problem I see is, who does Christ say will be the greatest in heaven? The person who says he will be a god? No. The Person who says they will rule their own planet and have spiritual babies? No. The person proclaiming their exaltation is going to be in for a world of surprise.

As for me, I will be content, squeaking in as the gates are closing. I can say, I have made a terrible showing for what a Christian is supposed to look like and live like. I have failed more than I have succeeded. I have fumbled more than I have carried. But as long as I am in the game, I will continue to try.
Xavierlives,
We have a fundamental difference, but thanks for a good chuckle. The scriptures are clear that blessings from God are promised by Him. He “chose” the principles for us to live by because He knew they would make us the happiest, then as we “choose” to live by those principles we are indeed just as happy as He promised we would be.

You wrote of a “change” in the principles and the blessings, and therein is the essence of the question to be answered by both praying and listening to the communicator of truth (the Holy Spirit), and by reading the exact words (in the original language if it were possible, but if not in as best a translation as we can trust) in the Bible that communicate the principles and the blessings. You think “we” have changed the principles and the blessings, but all we have really done is say there are covenants that are available for a “covenant people” to receive and live by, and they are very clear covenants contained in the Bible, with very clear promises and blessings (Remember, a covenant is two-way, like a contract).

Yet even as we LDS also live by every other principle (the common ones) and perceive the blessings that are abundantly given, someone will say “you can’t be really being blessed, because you don’t believe as I believe” and if so then I say to such a person, “you have no idea what you’re talking about–read the Bible, for goodness sake!”

But I suggest you won’t get it. Perhaps there is some self-justification going on (I do sense that in your last sentence). Obviously, Christ was the servant of all, so the obvious rejoinder that He didn’t intend for humankind to become joint heirs with Him since that would mean they would be rulers as promised by John in the Book of Revelation rather than being “servants”, just doesn’t understand why Christ said He was the servant of all, yet He is the Son of God and inherits a throne. You see, to be a joint heir with Him is to indeed be a servant–a joyful servant doing creative service forever and ever, in the most significant way possible.

It is a self-justification for someone to say “that’s prideful”. Meekness means exercising self-mastery and humility all at the same time, and it brings power that can come in no other way than being other-centered at all times. This is what Christ has promised can be possible for humankind, but only through Him because His grace allows that kind of lifting up to something that would otherwise be unthinkable and impossible.

As to “definitions”, you sound like a little bit like a “school-boy” with such a remark. The definitions are as plain as day. They are not difficult. They have been made difficult, perhaps, by those who have created a hodge-podge of meanings out of simple texts. One can read, think, grasp the simple direct meaning of the actual words, and learn what the Lord was saying and the apostles were saying.

Peace to you and all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top