LDS View of the Great Apostasy

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fatboys
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
So what you are saying is that our leaders know that the church is false, but continue with the false teachings because ??? How many truely con men would found a church bring forth not one book of scripture but three, learn and be fluent in six languages, understand anient hebrew, dictate a book that intertwines gospel principles, be tarred and feathered many times, live nearly destitute, have to move from one place to another, heal the sick, never have a place that was really his, move into a swamp and make it a beautiful city that was nearly as large as Chicago, build temples, put into jail on false charges, watch his children die, watch those were members be driven from their homes without any recompense, not just once but many times, to have mobs murder men women and children. For what reason would a con man go threw this? Money? He didn’t have any?
Have you seen the new mall in downtown SLC?

Why is the “first presidency” incorporated?

Do you know how many businesses are owned by the “corporation of the First Presidency”? Where do you think those profits go?

Not that murder or mob action is every right, but at some point don’t you think if the same problem happened no matter where smith went, maybe he brought some of it on himself?

He is the only one who made money off of the Bank scandal.

You have to realize that a con man’s success is off of the sweat of the unsuspecting. They set up a plan, and let others set it in motion. They sit back and wait for the reward.

I think you’re being a bit naive.
 
I assume you include St Paul. So there were at least 83 Mormons (12+70+1) who knew the Gospel …and that many of them went out and preached the Good News but they all fell into apostasy and there never was a written record, nor an oral tradition of a “great apostasy”, unlike the times the Church encountered heresys such as the Arians. Does the original church being Mormon mean that JS called the original Mormon church the whore of Babylon?

So the original Church was Mormon…I wonder of St Peter knew this? St Ignatius of Loyola did not. The original Mormons were some pretty bad teachers to have misled the church by only 110 ad.
"See that ye all follow the bishop, even as Christ Jesus does the Father, and the presbytery as ye would the apostles. Do ye also reverence the deacons, as those that carry out the appointment of God. Let no man do anything connected with the Church without the bishop. Let that be deemed a proper Eucharist, which is [administered] either by the bishop, or by one to whom he has entrusted it. Wherever the bishop shall appear, there let the multitude also be; by the bishop, or by one to whom he has entrusted it. Wherever the bishop shall appear, there let the multitude also be; even as, wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church
Are you trying to say that because Ignatius used the term “καθολικὴ” translated as catholic and meaning universal that he was referring to the Roman Catholic church as it now stands? And further ,that you believe wherever Christ is, the Roman Catholic church must also be? This is the height of presumption.
As regards ‘Catholic’, its original meaning was ‘universal’ or ‘general’, and in this sense Justin can speak of ‘the catholic resurrection’. As applied to the Church, its primary significance was to underline its universality as opposed to the local character of the individual congregations. J. N. D. Kelly, Early Christian Doctrines (San Francisco: Harper, 1960), p. 190.
 
The gnostic writings we still have, as well as the defining of their heresies by St. Ireneaus.

Yet, there is not one single document out there from ancient times that gives us any idea that LDS teachings existed back in the early 300’s.

The Christian Church evolved through great trevail and persecution and many martyrs. Practically all the apostles were martyrs and they did not die in vain nor did the ancient martyrs whose shed blood greatly brought about the following great conversions in the centuries ahead.

Before Constantine…by 100 AD, practically all the Sacred Scriptures were approved, the episcopacy confirmed as the means of ecclesia administration, the liturgy was in place and had uniformity of belief and practice throughout the entire ancient Christian world, and the Apostles Creed was professed by all believers in Christ.

So these 4 points: The books of Scripture, the episcopacy, the liturgy/memorial as form of worship and the sacraments, and the Apostles Creed were all intact by 100 AD.

The last of the Roman emperors were the most brutal. They were destroying most of the churches, and killing most bishops, and threatening the believers with most frightful torture. Constantine was the emperor from the East. He had a dream or vision to place the symbol of the cross – which Mormons reject – on his soldiers’ shields. He won the battle and defeated the emperors. Out of gratitude, he signed the Edict of Milan, his part in it to simply allow Christianity to exist and to have Sunday as a day of rest. He helped in rebuilding cathedrals and churches, and assisting in finding men capable of administrating as bishops, but the Church itself chose who would be bishop.

Yet he was not baptized, he was not a Christian in the universal Christian Church. His mother, St. Helen, was and she discovered the Holy Cross in the Holy Land. She prayed for his conversion.

But Constantine, like all in power, had his own ruthlessness.

Greek was the international language of the time. And the universal Christian Church simply took on in time the Greek word, ‘katholic’. meaning universal.

This idea that Constantine started the Catholic Church is coming now been coming out with this ‘great discovery’…akin to the gnostic writings that come out on ‘History’ Channel…any thing for the itching ears that non-denominationals who have no anchors and no history, will believe anything to support their independent thought. Unfortunately, such ideas about Constantine starting the Church or the Church hiding ‘truths’ about Christ in the condemned gnostic writings are believable by people who are not grounded in the historical and documented truth that the Catholic Church was truly instituted by Christ.

Christ is always present to us in the Word and He is the High Priest who ministers us Himself in the sacraments through our priests.

And the Eucharist has always been the center and summit of our faith since the Last Supper.
 
Why do you demand that all teaching be defined and enumerated. We will never subscribed to such things. .
Because God also made creation, including the Big Bang. If your religion goes against what God created then we know that God had nothing to do with it.

I’ve yet to see any Mormon try to square the Big Bang with this nonsense about God the Father once being a man and the elements being eternal.
 
Are you trying to imply that most of your “questions” in post 671 are essential teachings of the LDS church? Please…

Of your list I would only characterize your question about the triune God and perhaps that of the Holy Ghost as essential. It is vital to understand that God the Father, His son Jesus Christ, and the Holy Ghost as separate and distinct beings. It is also critical to know there roles. This is the meat you are missing.
Jan,

You can provide the meat any way you like…

Essential teaching
Belief
Doctrine
Taught

You dodged the question…please…
 
Yep that is exactly what I’m saying. Joesph was a first rate con man. And money? Oh brother. He had money. He owned a mansion that was later converted into a hotel (Nauvoo house) Brigham was the best liar of the bunch. Adam God, Blood atonement. The man was sick.
Do you believe in the Catholic church as being the true church from the time of Peter to now and that there has never been any questions as to what they have taught?
 
Do you believe in the Catholic church as being the true church from the time of Peter to now and that there has never been any questions as to what they have taught?
Hi, had to butt in ! There have alwawys been questions, God knows all things,that is why Jesus said the Gates of hell will not prevail.🍿

God Bless
onenow1
 
Do you believe in the Catholic church as being the true church from the time of Peter to now and that there has never been any questions as to what they have taught?
Fat,

The Catholic Church is the one true Church.

This Church is the mystery hidden for all ages.

This Church became visible from the time of Peter to now.

There has never been any question as to what they taught.

There have always been questions in discerning that teaching as evidenced by the numerous need to answer questions by that Church.

The Nicene Creed is a formulation of that Church that aims to answer questions raised by those not able to discern.

The Catechism is a formulation of teachings that are consistent in the Church and there are still many not able to discern and still question what is taught. One example is abortion. Abortion is murder, always has been, always will be. No apostasy occurred to change this teaching. Any group that waivers on the issue of abortion has to be questioned as to what truths they believe they have.

Where does this LDS group you belong to stand on the morality of abortion? Is it always wrong or do you make exceptions and why?
 
I believe you are deceived and teach the deception without realizing what it is. That doesn’t make you a liar.q
Thank you
Yes, I know. A great example is Orson Pratt, who disagreed publicly and in print (The Seer) with Brigham Young, specifically on Young’s Adam/God doctrine. Young silenced him.
He did disagree with the teaching, and it being a doctrine, but he finally agreed to it. But the teaching left much to speculation. It is a very complex teaching which the members were not ready to understand. Some of the fundalmentalist still adhere to its teachings, but how they understand it is no different than any other group that goes into apostasy. Brigham Young stated that the only thing he did wrong as the prophet was teach more than the members were ready for.
Code:
    I have spent years of discussion with these groups, and have had some of my friends get sucked into its beliefs. I have also had friends that have left the group and they floated around for a while, repented and came back to the main body. In fact I put my foot in my mouth one day when I was at a grocery store a few years ago. I use to haul my calves down to central Utah to an auction. My wife and I were on our way home when we stopped at the store and was in a checkout waiting in line when this woman came behind us who I had went to school with. In the area of the store it is a known place for polygamist. I said Amber, how the blank are ya? It had been thirty years since I had ever seen her and she did not like me even though it seemed that we had many classes together. I was a roughneck cowboy who did not have proper language. In othe words I was a potty mouth. She wouldn't say manure if your mouth was full of it. Miss goody two shoes, molly mormon. It use to make her cringe when I spoke and my evil young immature way fell out of my mouth. Yes I know..   My wife punched my with her elbow. Anyway I asked why she was down here. She said that her and her husband had moved to Manti. I said you didn't join those blankety blank fundamentalist did you in my tactful way. She said yes. Well my mouth about hit my toes, and for the first time in my life, I could not say anything. She seemed embarrassed. I asked do you still part of them, she said no. The sold everything they had and gave it to them, and now they were trying to rebuild their lives. They were not members of the LDS church, but were floating around. Anyway I learned a great lesson, don't open my mouth before thinking. I still struggle with that at times. But I am getting better.
You are taught it, you believe it. So what does it matter if you call it doctrine, or not?
Before I accept it as doctrine it has to go through the process. There are some members of the church who struggle with it. It is really not important to my salvation as to whether I believe it or not. What is the most important is Faith in Jesus Christ, Repenting and doing my best to follow Christ, baptized and covenanting with God to take upon my self the name of Christ, to stand as a witness Christ at all times and in all places, to obey his laws, and to remember him always. And then receive the gift of the Holy Ghost to be my constant companion. That is what is important to my salvation, not the stuff that is in the Journal of Discourses, or any other writtings or talks. It is nice to know but just is not important. And many times it leads to speculations where some people get so focused on that they loose site of what is important. And some start to think that they know more than anyone else. That is when they begin to loose the spirit.
y repeat what you have learned, with no reasoning behind what you say. You are simultaneously saying “it isn’t doctrine”, while saying it is a “truth”. Correct? Or you believe something that you don’t believe is true? I didn’t think so.
Doctrine comes from the Latin doctrina, which means instruction or teaching. Your leaders instruct and teach, and you believe. Wouldn’t you say that is doctrine? If you (or any Mormon) doesn’t believe what you are instructed and taught, why would you follow the instructors?
Bias? Then you aren’t paying attention. People are going to question what you say you believe. That is what happens in this forum. It goes both ways. You are too biased to hear what Catholics are saying.
Sorry to be so confusing. It is not confusing to me. And again you want to pin down what is doctrine and what is not. As I said it is quite easy, it is in our canon of scriptures.
 
I am so glad that you brought this original thought up. I wonder if Jesus would have passed his test?
Fat,

Solomon flunked this test…the quest for Money-Sex-Power seems to be rampant in those that tend to lead others into untruth. You say that Jo had no money…? Ok…what about Sex-Power?

Your comment on Jesus is ignored…he had no Money-Sex and the Power he used among other things was to forgive sin, perform miracles and to raise Himself from the dead, something that Jo Smith could not do.
 
What is the most important is Faith in Jesus Christ, Repenting and doing my best to follow Christ, baptized and covenanting with God to take upon my self the name of Christ, to stand as a witness Christ at all times and in all places, to obey his laws, and to remember him always.
Fat -

You sound pretty Catholic here and I respect that…I also respectt that you are trying your best to follow Christ, which is evident that you are posting here.

I am going to say a Novena for you and Janderich over the next 9 days. I would invite others to join me. Here’s more on Novenas.

newadvent.org/cathen/11141b.htm

After praying for you for 9 days…perhaps you would consider spending time at the Cathedral. God will listen to you where ever you go. FYI, I’m passing through SLC on Dec 4th having been in Scottsdale. Sadly, I can not stay and go to the Madeleine. 😦
 
A Mormons faith is based on feelings (testimony): “burning in bosom”. I don’t think arguing with Mormons will get anywhere. Even the Smithsonian has said that the BOM is fiction. But there are millions of people in this country who believe this fabrication. It’s sad.
 
A Mormons faith is based on feelings (testimony): “burning in bosom”. I don’t think arguing with Mormons will get anywhere. Even the Smithsonian has said that the BOM is fiction. But there are millions of people in this country who believe this fabrication. It’s sad.
How many pop songs are there out now that talk about how “feelings” lead into fornication? How many of us remember how our parents told us to use our heads and not to give into feelings?

Why would God expect us to use our heads when it comes to one kind of feeling when it comes to the sin of fornication, but to stop thinking when it comes to another that potentially involves the sin of idolatry?
 
A Mormons faith is based on feelings (testimony): “burning in bosom”. I don’t think arguing with Mormons will get anywhere. Even the Smithsonian has said that the BOM is fiction. But there are millions of people in this country who believe this fabrication. It’s sad.
Proll,

This proves the point that Imagination and stored information provide as real an image of the world we live in as stored information alone.

I see that the LDS say…

History cannot be trusted
The Bible is corrupt…ie cannot be trusted
Churches are apostate…ie cannot be trusted

Then the question is who is to be trusted…

Protestant thought sprang forth with some notion that the 3rd century was the turning point for truth, discussing Ancient Church, as if different from the Church today…abstracting the Bible and adding whatever elements suited the particular denomination…

From that we have the LDS that say "oh no, the 1st century is where things went astray and even the book cannot be trusted…so look here at this stuff…

Protestant thought has given us

Jehovah Witness and The New World Translation
Seventh Day Adventist and the prophet Ellen White
Oneness Pentacostals and denial of the Trinity

The imagination alone has given us

Scientology and others like it and here we see the imagination at work within the context of revealed truths

LDS, cannot trust history, cannot trust the Bible, cannot trust any religion…so who do you trust…Joseph Smith…and when raised in any environment real or imagined the beliefs are the same in the context of ability to believe and difficulty in shedding those beliefs…

Here a Harvard trained Philosopher found his way out…many intelligent people have found their way out…it is not easy…

whyimcatholic.com/index.php/conversion-stories/mormon-converts/item/62-mormon-convert-richard-sherlock

or here…

exmormon.org/d6/drupal/whylft50

A Mormon Church Translator for 15 Years and Her High Councilman Husband
 
Jan,
You can provide the meat any way you like…

Essential teaching
Belief
Doctrine
Taught

You dodged the question…please…
Very well first is God, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Ghost. The doctrine of the Trinity was not taught in the Old Testement or New Testament and only developed over time. You can find more about this change in doctrine here.

God the Eternal Father

God is the Supreme ruler of the universe whom we worship. Moreover he, “has a body of flesh and bones as tangible as man’s” (D&C 130:22). We are literally his children and he is our Father. Before this world began, we as spirits, were begotten of him. He is our father we are his sons and daughters. “For in him we live, and move, and have our being; … For we are also his offspring.” (Acts 17:28).

Jesus Christ

Jesus is the Firstborn of the Father in Spirit and the Only Begotten of the Father in the Flesh. He is God’s son. As God’s son, he is individual, separate and distinct from the Father. He came on earth to atone for all mankind. Through his great sacrifice we may be saved. All those who have ever lived, if they accept him, may likewise be saved. At his resurrection his spirit joined his body never to be separated again. All who have ever lived will likewise be resurrected. Through his priesthood the work of salvation is carried on.

Holy Ghost

The Holy Ghost is a personage of Spirit also separate and distinct from the Father and Son. As a member of the Godhead he testifies of truth. He is a revelator, through him we may gain a testimony of truth.
 
Thank you
You’re welcome.
He did disagree with the teaching, and it being a doctrine, but he finally agreed to it. But the teaching left much to speculation. It is a very complex teaching which the members were not ready to understand. Some of the fundalmentalist still adhere to its teachings, but how they understand it is no different than any other group that goes into apostasy. Brigham Young stated that the only thing he did wrong as the prophet was teach more than the members were ready for.
Code:
    I have spent years of discussion with these groups, and have had some of my friends get sucked into its beliefs.....
Great story. I think it happens at one time or another to everyone. 😃 My worst one occurred in jr. high. I grew up in a very racist household and extended family, what they believed was supported by what I was being taught in primary and Sunday school. At that time, the priesthood ban was still in effect, with all the reasoning given behind it in my primary and Sunday school classes. The kind of teachings that you call “opinion”. (Are you getting the theme here yet? Everything you say is anti-Mormon I was taught by Mormons, as a Mormon.)

Anyway, racial slurs around our house were insults that you threw around at your siblings, and strangers who were “ignernt”. So one day in jr. high, I was about 12 years old, I was having a conversation with a friend, we were teasing each other back and forth, having a good time, when I called her the “N” word. She laughed and walked away to class, I turned around, and standing there was the only African American girl in the school. The only African American girl that had ever been in any school I had gone to. The look on her face, one of anger and hurt, told me clearly that I had said something wrong. I hurried off to class, but to this day, have never used that word again.

At any rate, yes, Adam/God doctrine was taught to me as well as all the racist beliefs surrounding the priesthood ban.

People like you say, it wasn’t doctrine, but it was and still is by many Mormons, BELIEVED. Why, because it what has been taught. You keep trying to create a demarcation between doctrine and belief, but there isn’t one. Belief comes from what you are taught, and what you are taught causes you to believe. Who in the heck cares whether or not you label it doctrine?

When you come to realize that what you are taught should not be believed, then you are on your way to watching Smith & Co.'s house of cards fall. You keep trying to keep every individual card propped up, why? Wouldn’t you think that truth should not need props and it should be able to stand, as a rock, firmly, on its own?
Before I accept it as doctrine it has to go through the process. There are some members of the church who struggle with it. It is really not important to my salvation as to whether I believe it or not. What is the most important is Faith in Jesus Christ, Repenting and doing my best to follow Christ, baptized and covenanting with God to take upon my self the name of Christ, to stand as a witness Christ at all times and in all places, to obey his laws, and to remember him always. And then receive the gift of the Holy Ghost to be my constant companion. That is what is important to my salvation, not the stuff that is in the Journal of Discourses, or any other writtings or talks. It is nice to know but just is not important. And many times it leads to speculations where some people get so focused on that they loose site of what is important. And some start to think that they know more than anyone else. That is when they begin to loose the spirit.
Well then Fatboys, here’s the corner you have painted yourself into. If you strip away all of the oddities of Mormonism, what you say is not essential to your Salvation, what do you have left? NOTHING that needed to be restored, that is for certain. Everything essential to your Salvation is in Christ’s Church, the same Church established by Christ, the same Church that has through the ages been serving her mission to bring people to Christ. For their Salvation.

Smith is superfluous to the event of Christ, his church just one among many that were fired up by people during the second great awakening in the U.S.
Sorry to be so confusing. It is not confusing to me. And again you want to pin down what is doctrine and what is not. As I said it is quite easy, it is in our canon of scriptures.
Show me in this doctrine about doctrine then. Where does it say in your scriptures that your doctrine is only found in scriptures?
 
Very informative posts. I heard some Afro Americans would not vote for a certain candidate simply because of racist policies in the past.

And looking at another recent post…what Protestantism did essentially was break the bond of the family…by accepting divorce.

Christianity is the greatest bloc in the USA but it is a shattered faith…shattered like glass because there is no common doctrine or unity. Mormonism goes even beyond such basic beliefs to puts an entirely man made purpose and end, using Christ and Christianity to be other than what it is.

You water down doctrine and the truth of Jesus Christ, you only add to more polarity and division for our country. Our American faith is one of both compromise and fragmentation.

I don’t think the Mormons can accuse Christianity for being apostate. I think Mormonism is more faith in the individual male man, rather than God Himself. Mormonism, in reference to Eve ‘seeking wisdom’ so she could become as a gods is telling because, like Adam and Eve, Mormonism rejects the Tree of Life – Jesus Christ and His fruit, the only one identified by God that they could eat.
 
From Genesis, a side note here…how one enters into Divinity by eating…not by working on one’s progression or seeing the Eucharist in simply symbolic terms…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top