Let's Take a Look Back on Exactly How Kamala Harris Treated Brett Kavanaugh

  • Thread starter Thread starter Victoria33
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
V

Victoria33

Guest

Let’s Take a Look Back on Exactly How Kamala Harris Treated Brett Kavanaugh​

Katie Pavlich
Posted: Aug 12, 2020 4:30 PM

As Reagan wrote earlier today, newly minted vice presidential candidate and Senator Kamala Harris’ hypocrisy on matters of sexual harassment, sexual assault and the “me too” movement is stunning. After all, she said during the 2020 Democrat primary that she believed women accusing Biden of sexual assault and yet, she has agreed to be his running mate.

But Harris’ most egregious behavior came during the 2018 Supreme Court confirmation hearing of then Judge Brett Kavanaugh. Because memories are short, let’s take a look at exactly how she treated him.

After Justice Kavanaugh was confirmed and rightfully seated on the Supreme Court, the Senate Judiciary Committee released a 400-page report detailing all of the false accusations made against him. A number of individuals were referred to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution after lying to Senate investigators. Those individuals included Michael Avenatti, Julie Swetnik and Judy Munro-Leighton. Leighton admitted to investigators she made up rape allegations against Kavanaugh to “get attention” and as part of a “ploy” to take down his nomination. All of them were upheld by Democrats and the media as heroes for truth and justice.
Click to expand...
Videos, more at link.
 
This seems a bit inconsequential to me. If we looked back at other politicians, I think we would be scratching to find a record everyone approves %100. This just seems like part of Trump campaign ongoing bid to slur the opponent.
If anyone doubts that is going on, just look at the latest twitter meme about Biden.

Where oh where are the politicians in any country who will not engage in slur tactics and instead, concentrate on what they will do if elected.
 
Victoria33 said:
Leighton admitted to investigators she made up rape allegations against Kavanaugh to “get attention” and as part of a “ploy” to take down his nomination.
Click to expand...
This is the kind if info that never gets discussed or addressed with those who went after Kavanaugh. Is this woman in jail? She should be.
 
umamibella said:
This just seems like part of Trump campaign ongoing bid to slur the opponent.
If anyone doubts that is going on, just look at the latest twitter meme about Biden.
Click to expand...
Is this your first election? Using your opponents words and actions against them goes back decades at least.
Trump touts what he has done and will do A LOT. Biden touts his record A LOT. Both campaigns will attack the other one A LOT.

Not sure what you expect to change from the previous 30 years at least, or why you single out one candidate, unless you have a bias against them unfairly?
 
umamibella said:
This just seems like part of Trump campaign ongoing bid to slur the opponent.
If anyone doubts that is going on, just look at the latest twitter meme about Biden.
Click to expand...
When asked about the allegations of sexual abuse by Joe Biden BEFORE being asked to be VP, Harris said she said of the accusers, “I believe them.”

Now she wants to be the running mate of someone who she thinks sexually assaulted women? Really? Is sexual assault less important than her political advancement?

This is no slur…its utter hypocrisy and political opportunism. Based on her own words, Biden is a sexual abuser, and she does not care.
 
KMC said:
This is no slur…its utter hypocrisy and political opportunism. Based on her own words, Biden is a sexual abuser, and she does not care.
Click to expand...
That is literally the only take away from this.

She admits she believes he sexually abused Reade, and she is happy to be his running mate.

That’s her choice of course, but can we just be honest enough to state that? Progressives lost their mind because guys like Steve Bannon were Presidential advisors. Now you have a woman on a ticket who has problem serving underneath a man she believes is a sexual predator.
 
That was so unfair to Kavanaugh. Maybe one is not in the USA; but these were live nationally televised trials or interrogations on nothing but the weakest of allegations. There wasn’t a shred of evidence to support any of this and yet, the whole country went through this. I think the word is “witch hunt”. I assume this “Russia affair” was more of the same ol.

I would hope that everyone knows the situation of which we speak which was a hot item right here on these forums.

We are talking about real people here. Put people through this without anything backing up the allegations?? And yes, I know I am repeating myself.


Some of what we talk about, a lot of us don’t even really want to go into so much depth into the details. How does it help me at the end of the day??

It’s just one thing to just make up something about anyone and it could be done to anyone at all.

Meanwhile, his accuser, Blaise-Ford is all tied up into Planned Parenthood…this whole incident was disgraceful.

 
Last edited:
It really doesn’t matter. No one is going to be swayed one way or the other. I don’t think there are any fence sitters in this election.
 
Dr_Meinheimer said:
Is this your first election?
Click to expand...
oh please, and you @KMC

this is what politicians all seem to do these days, focus on the opponent take down instead of real policy. make a lot of empty promises.

I would like to see a politician with real christian values that include loving your neighbour as yourself.
Historic sex misconduct allegations are in the Republican candidate past also.
Muddying those waters could just come back to bite republican presidents too, especially those who ask female reporters to touch his hair, or who are known friends / acquaintences of convicted and detained sex predators.
 
Last edited:
One thing Townhall failed to mention (because it does not comport with their narrative) is that Leighton, despite her initial claim, was not the author of the anonymous “Jane Doe” letter to Kamala Harris. Yes, she did initially claim authorship to grab attention, but she was not materially a factor in any of the hearing since she made her claim of authorship only after the confirmation. She was essentially not involved, despite wanting to claim she was.
 
umamibella said:
oh please, and you @KMC

this is what politicians all seem to do these days, focus on the opponent take down instead of real policy. make a lot of empty promises.

I would like to see a politician with real christian values that include loving your neighbour as yourself.
Historic sex misconduct allegations are in the Republican candidate past also.
Muddying those waters could just come back to bite republican presidents too, especially those who ask female reporters to touch his hair, or who are known friends / acquaintences of convicted and detained sex predators.
Click to expand...
Yes, but here we are talking about total fabrications, at least in many people’s eyes, to deny someone being on the Supreme Court, denying someone that with the flimsiest of evidence. An assault on our system.

We are hardly talking about “sexual misconduct allegations” in my view, just a total hit job.

Maybe Brett Kavanaugh does have “real christian values” as far as that goes. So, this should be defended.

As in the other threads, I’m going to try to avoid going off-topic and into a total free-for-all, a scrum.

Your comments seem to be extremely broad and general in addressing a specific situation.
 
Last edited:
Does it matter? I was told were supposed to believe all women.
 
Isn’t she the one who interrogated a senator or whatever for being a Knight of Columbus?
 
Victoria33 said:
We are hardly talking about “sexual misconduct allegations” in my view, just a total hit job.
Click to expand...
My comments are about the total hit job that the Republicans are attempting on this woman. Also the way that is now filtering down to social media forums like this one.
 
umamibella said:
My comments are about the total hit job that the Republicans are attempting on this woman. Also the way that is now filtering down to social media forums like this one.
Click to expand...
She won’t get any sympathy from me on this account. You haven’t pointed out one thing in the OP about what the Republicans did. Any falsehood, any attack in the OP, it’s just saying “I don’t like it”.

Again, I might as well go off topic too, I won’t be voting for any ticket that has people supporting infanticide. Oops, must be a hit piece.


We get all these anti-Trump articles but oh my, when the shoe is on the other foot, we hear the worse.
 
Last edited:
Since Kamala Harris was questioning a potential district judge whose duty it to uphold the law of the land, it is not that strange that she would ask him about his membership in an organization that is opposed to the law of the land. (Note: being a Catholic, I am also opposed to those particular laws of the land as that nominee. But then I am not a nominee for district judge and don’t expect to be.) When Jack Kennedy was running for President as the first Catholic President, many were worried that his allegiance would be first to the Pope and only secondarily to the US. He was very clear when he said he is an an American first and the Catholic second. If he had not said that, he may not have been elected.
 
Last edited:
LeafByNiggle said:
Since Kamala Harris was questioning a potential district judge whose duty it to uphold the law of the land, it is not that strange that she would ask him about his membership in an organization that is opposed to the law of the land. (Note: being a Catholic, I am also opposed to those particular laws of the land as that nominee. But then I am not a nominee for district judge.)
Click to expand...
And slavery was the law of the land at one time.
 
umamibella said:
focus on the opponent take down instead of real policy
Click to expand...
this describes the democrat strategy of the last 4 years
umamibella said:
I would like to see a politician with real christian values that include loving your neighbour as yourself.
Click to expand...
OK…so what are your thoughts about Harris’s view on abortion and membership within the Knights of Columbus, and Biden’s desire to overturn the judgment for the Little Sisters of the Poor? Do you think those perspectives have “real Christian values”?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top