C
If you’re a Christian, there is no such thing as reincarnation.Thanks for this, it is certainly amazing & thought provoking. He has done an awful lot of good with his life, that’s for sure.
There’s one thing that concerns me that I noticed. He mentions that Jesus says,“I want you to go back to the world. In your second life you will be an instrument of peace & healing…”
I’m not sure if Jesus would say this, because it could be misleading in that it sounds like some people have a 2nd chance at life. I believe it could be misleading & lead others to believe in things like re-incarnation. That’s why I don’t think Jesus would say that, for the potential to lead His lambs astray.
Near death is not the same as dead. Dead enough that his body was on its way to the morgue. Literally, he did have a second chance at life.I should clarify that I do think people sometimes have near death experiences, & have a 'second chance at life" in that they recover from an accident, illness or addiction.
Jesus didn’t tell us that we can die, go to heaven then come back to life. He told the priest, not us. Don’t read too much into it.I just don’t think Jesus would tell us that some can die, go to heaven, return & have a second life. That is what I meant to say.![]()
I see your point here. With my last message, I was responding to your message #4. I hadn’t seen your last 2 messages yet. I do maintain, though, that I am concerned with any locution, experience or vision that contains something in it that is contrary to Catholic teaching.God can do whatever He wants. The rest of us should stick to what the Church teaches.
How would you call it if someone comes back from the dead, like Lazarus?I know. I’m just concerned that I don’t think Jesus would use the words “in your second life”… Reincarnation was just one example I could think of that an idea like that could lead to.
The idea of a second life is contrary to Catholic teaching. I hope the priest mixed up the words that he thought Christ used, or he remembered it incorrectly. I don’t think Christ would say something that is contrary to Catholic teaching. If Christ didn’t provide this vision or experience, who did? I’m concerned for the priest & think this sends a subtle false message. Some visions & locutions are demonic, & I pray this isn’t.
In a larger scope, I see nothing contrary to the teaching of the Church. More of an insight of what is out there after death.I see your point here. With my last message, I was responding to your message #4. I hadn’t seen your last 2 messages yet. I do maintain, though, that I am concerned with any locution, experience or vision that contains something in it that is contrary to Catholic teaching.
I am not saying he is doing anything intentionally wrong. I tried to speak very respectfully of him. I said he is doing wonderful things after a profound experience. I am just concerned that he might have unwillingly received a false or even demonic message.How would you call it if someone comes back from the dead, like Lazarus?
The purpose of the priest is not to teach that people can come back to life after they die. He is only sharing his experience. His purpose is to bring peace and healing to the people just as Jesus instructed. That’s it.
I don’t mean to argue with you, because I’m sure he’s a wonderful priest & missionary. I think, though, that supernatural experiences have to be looked at very carefully. I have heard that Satan will confuse people by putting one subtle falsehood out there with other beautiful messages. That’s why I’m concerned that this message from the Lord told the priest he was to have a second life. The idea of a second life is what goes against Catholic teaching.In a larger scope, I see nothing contrary to the teaching of the Church. More of an insight of what is out there after death.
I see nothing contrary and I don’t see having a second life is the new teaching or anything.I don’t mean to argue with you, because I’m sure he’s a wonderful priest & missionary. I think, though, that supernatural experiences have to be looked at very carefully. I have heard that Satan will confuse people by putting one subtle falsehood out there with other beautiful messages. That’s why I’m concerned that this message from the Lord told the priest he was to have a second life. The idea of a second life is what goes against Catholic teaching.
I don’t think he is doing anything intentionally wrong, but I am leary of a supernatural experience that contains ANYTHING that is contrary to Catholic teaching.
This is amazing. It is kind of scary, but it gives you hope, too. The experience of the priest from India is similar, too. To be honest, I didn’t mean to upset anyone by questioning something that does inspire hope.Did you folks catch this one on Mother Angelica?
frtommylane.com/homilies/year_c/lent3.htm
Don’t get me wrong, I know Mother is not the pope, and she is not infallible. But I think she does a pretty good job of screening stuff that would be contrary to what is official teaching. It made it to her show, so that gives it some additional credibility in my book.
There’s nothing to apologize for. I’m not upsetThis is amazing. It is kind of scary, but it gives you hope, too. The experience of the priest from India is similar, too. To be honest, I didn’t mean to upset anyone by questioning something that does inspire hope.
I think I’m very gun shy about supernatural experiences & locutions. Prior to the last 5 or 6 years, I never new people sometimes have visions or locutions. I had only heard of things like Lourdes & Fatima. I was unaware of occurences like Akita, Medgugorie (sp.?) & many others. About 4 years ago I started reading the books by Anne, A Lay Apostle. I loved those messages, read the books over & over again & eagerly awaited the monthly messages. Since then, I have found out they might not be true. I have followed links on this site that make me unsure. They might be true, but maybe not, & now I just don’t know. If they are untrue, I hope they are a hoax & not demonic messages. The idea that we can follow or be led astray by demonic messages FREAKS me out. For me, the possibility of this makes me want to stay away from anything supernatural unless it is fully approved by the Church. I know that’s not required, though.
So, I know I’m just gun shy, & I’m sorry if my concern upset you cathgal. I wasn’t trying to be difficult or diminish something that could inspire people.
Thanks, cathgal. Also, I didn’t mean to imply that you were acting upset, just that I hope I didn’t upset you…There’s nothing to apologize for. I’m not upset![]()
It’s good that you are wary about these things. You wouldn’t miss out much if you don’t believe in these stuff. The Church already has all the answers concerning our salvation. My point is, as long as I don’t see anything contrary to the Church’s teaching, I wouldn’t worry too much about this priest guiding his flock.