R
rpp
Guest
I think the problem is with feminism. We see that in some of the posters here. Feminism promotes a way of thinking that says “if a woman cannot do what men do, then they must be inferior.” The corollary, of men being inferior to women, is wholly denied.There is an old story about the Pope asking God about this. He asks “when will there be married priests”-God says-"not in your lifetime. He then asks when will there be female Priests-God replied “Not in my lifetime”.
The Church is about as likely to ordain women as it is to deny the Resuurection of Christ. Given John Paul the Great’s explicit statment on this one must wonder just what is it about “NO” people dont undertsand?
This attitude rejects the very concept of gender based roles. This is an absurd conclusion which is not even supported in biology (e.g. men are generally stronger and larger, women bear children.) This attitude not only emasculates men, it renders men utterly superflous and relegates to nothing more than a sperm bank.
The essential message of modern feminism is not equality, it is emasculation.
On the other hand, a “holy feminism” understanding is one which promotes proper geneder roles, even if they are not traditional. For example, in many places it was traditional for women to not be able to own property, hold a job or vote. That is not treating a woman with equal dignity. A woman should, no must, be permitted to do this things as a means of helping to support her family, herself, and participating in civic life.
This is different than claiming God (or the Church) is sexist because He has set forth in doctrine an all-male priesthood. Using the same logic, you can claim that God is sexist because men cannot bear children. Both claims are equally absurd.