P
puer.dei
Guest
Imagine that!in order to prevent a large crowd from forming during a pandemic that has killed over 200,000 people in this country.
Imagine that!in order to prevent a large crowd from forming during a pandemic that has killed over 200,000 people in this country.
Maybe. But it was not and never was the press conference they are implicitly attempting to make it out to be either.It was not and never was a rally.
A salient point and I agree. I’ve read multiple reports of people standing 8-10 hours or more in some places. One article I read made another interesting point–that votes cast early or mailed cannot be changed or retracted between now and Election Day. If large numbers of Democrats have already cast their votes, then that leaves a smaller and smaller pool of remaining voters that might be swayed by Republicans.Especially when you consider all the Republican efforts to suppress voting, a lot more time may be required.
Sounds like a typical 2020 Cubs game.“50 persons” probably includes Biden and Harris, campaign staffers, and the intended audience
It was poorly attended and FAKE.
I already did. Notifying the press.
Our ballots arrived two days ago and will be mailed off within a few days. I have zero desire to stand in lines (I’m a bit handicapped and standing is painful) and with my future son in law being immunocompromised , my husband and myself being high risk, sure don’t want to risk exposure to Covid19!Yep, many votes are already in. I plan on going next week.
Do you think this was private?Notifying the press does not make an event or an appearance open to the public.
Perhaps if you want to consider human dignity in the equation it may be better to focus on the candidate instead of me.I understand the passion that politics creates among supporters of each nominee. We, as Catholics, have a duty to the human dignity of fellow humans, even in the midst of heated and at times desperate runs for that office, the ultimate goal of the candidate.
Fine. You don’t need to respond.So many questions you ask.
I am not going to respond to the ‘allegiance’ imperatives.
If you think that, I suggest you get in touch with President Trump or his campaign and asking him if Joe Biden was being truthful when he kicked-off his campaign with the Charlottesville hoax.I suggest perhaps getting in touch with the press office of the Biden campaign and asking . . . Emails and phone calls are pretty cost effective measures of establishing the truth. . . . Get it directly then report back to us.
You seriously believe that? I think that’s the lamest excuse for a washout Ive ever heard.an event that wasn’t public and had details withheld from the public so that it wouldn’t attract crowds.
Especially to interrogative imperatives seeking personal views. Personal views do not equate to facts. Personal views can equate to fake news and its propagation.Fine. You don’t need to respond.
Please do not change topics. Your topic isIf you think that, I suggest you get in touch with President Trump or his campaign and asking him if Joe Biden was being truthful when he kicked-off his campaign with the Charlottesville hoax.
This thread is attempting to establish the private or public nature of a visit to Arizona in respect to crowds and invitations to events.Literally zero spectators at joint Biden-Harris campaign appearance in Arizona.
Is it not easier and less hassle, if seeking to make a point in creating a thread, to get a direct answer so you can directly say ’ it was a public event, x # of tickets were released to the general public, x # of tickets were taken up, x # of people showed up…therefore…Get it directly then report back to us.
Notifying the press of what exactly, where and how and by whom and for what purpose.Notifying the press.
I knew that was going to be the response I got.Please do not change topics.
I knew that was going to be the response I got.
…This will be my final reply on this thread as I suspect any further discussion will be influenced by personal allegience rather then objectivity.
Fair enough for you to think that humilityseeker.This will be my final reply on this thread as I suspect any further discussion will be influenced by personal allegience rather then objectivity.
Not maybe, reality.Maybe.
They aren’t attempting to make it a press conference. It was a campaign meeting with an interest group, an extremely common sort of campaign event the press is often invited to.But it was not and never was the press conference they are implicitly attempting to make it out to be either.
Politicians wave at cameras, especially when actively campaigning. It may shock you but Republican politicians also wave at cameras.You don’t come out waving at a press conference.
It simply was not. This remains fantasy.It’s a rally alright. Or at least a mini-rally.
It turned out exactly as they thought it would turn out, those who were invited came. Those who were not invited did not come.Just not how they thought it would turn out.
Oh the irony.They ignored the obvious signs (that I brought out above) and offered no evidence other than their conjecture.
She wasn’t.WHY was the news woman expecting to see people there?
Nothing, because they won’t. There’s a lot you can say about Biden but his campaign takes hundreds of thousands of people dying seriously instead of encouraging infections and deaths.What are you going to say when Biden and Harris have large visitor venues later as the election approaches?
Why would you think something this silly?I think they anticipated SOME Biden supporters there and were wrong.
Yes, because as humilityseeker helpfully linked a couple posts up that was the plan announced by the Biden campaign a week ago.You seriously believe that?