Liturgical pioneers bring music to Frankenmuth that helped redefine the Catholic church

  • Thread starter Thread starter Elizium23
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
E

Elizium23

Guest
mlive.com/entertainment/saginaw/index.ssf/2012/09/liturgical_pioneers_bring_the.html
FRANKENMUTH, MI – As Martin Luther King Jr. led the fight for civil rights, protesters called for an end to the war in Vietnam and students stormed the universities, the Catholic church started a revolution of its own 50 years ago with the Second Vatican Council.
And contemporary composers Michael Joncas, Marty Haugen and Bridgeport native David Haas, who will perform again in Michigan for the first time in 27 years on Friday, Oct. 5, at the Blessed Trinity Catholic Church in Frankenmuth, rocked the Catholic liturgy with their controversial departure from the traditional Gregorian chants and choir-sung hymns.
“Up until then, music was directed at the people rather than inviting them to participate,” Haas said, calling from his home in Minnesota. “We’d play Peter, Paul and Mary and Simon and Garfunkel at first because we didn’t have music of our own to play yet, but everything we did invited everyone to sing along.
Raised on a steady diet of this kind of music for liturgy, I am now embarrassed and repelled by being forced to sing it over and over when the Church in Vatican II clearly wanted no such thing. My parish is taking baby steps to abandon these guys in favor of chanted propers. Please pray for us as we make the transition.
 
“Up until then, music was directed at the people rather than inviting them to participate,” Haas said, calling from his home in Minnesota.
Yeah, it was left up to the people who could sing. The Catholic Church should’ve left the folk music to Peter, Paul and Mary & shown those lol “contemporary” composers the door.
 
mlive.com/entertainment/saginaw/index.ssf/2012/09/liturgical_pioneers_bring_the.html

Raised on a steady diet of this kind of music for liturgy, I am now embarrassed and repelled by being forced to sing it over and over when the Church in Vatican II clearly wanted no such thing. My parish is taking baby steps to abandon these guys in favor of chanted propers. Please pray for us as we make the transition.
Banal and vapid. The two words that best describe the musical “geniuses” Haugen and Haas. I am amazed to this day that a non-Catholic would be the composer of the bulk of music used in contemporary Catholic parishes.
 
I am not saying that all of their music is acceptable to use during the liturgy (as I have not heard all of their music) BUT I do not think it is as bad as you all are making it out to be. The music they have composed has done exactly what the Vatican II reforms were striving for: the full, active, and aware participation by all of the people.

From Sacrosanctum Concilium, or the Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy:
In the restoration and promotion of the Sacred Liturgy, this full and active participation by all the people is the aim to be considered before all else; for it is the primary and indispensable source from which the faithful are to derive the true Christian spirit.
Also, the USCCB’s document Music in Catholic Worship states:
As sacred song united to the words it [music] forms an integral part of solemn liturgy. Yet the function of music is ministerial; it must serve and never dominate. Music should assist the assembled believers to express and share the gift of faith that is within them…It imparts a sense of unity to the congregation and sets the appropriate tone for a particular celebration.
Now, that being said, I will admit that some of the composers listed above have music that is not suitable for all occasions. But there are many of the more traditional hymns that are also only suitable for certain occasions.
 
Hmm, Hass and Haugen concert tomorrow nite?

Sorry, already booked, I’ve got to something FAR more important, staring at a wall or something. It will be substantially less banal as well 😛
 
I am not saying that all of their music is acceptable to use during the liturgy (as I have not heard all of their music) BUT I do not think it is as bad as you all are making it out to be. The music they have composed has done exactly what the Vatican II reforms were striving for: the full, active, and aware participation by all of the people.

From Sacrosanctum Concilium, or the Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy:
You may wish to consider Pope Benedict’s Post-Synodal Apostolic Exhortation Sacramentum Caritatis:
Actuosa participatio
*** Authentic participation***
52. The Second Vatican Council rightly emphasized the active, full and fruitful participation of the entire People of God in the eucharistic celebration (155). Certainly, the renewal carried out in these past decades has made considerable progress towards fulfilling the wishes of the Council Fathers. **Yet we must not overlook the fact that some misunderstanding has occasionally arisen concerning the precise meaning of this participation. It should be made clear that the word “participation” does not refer to mere external activity during the celebration. In fact, the active participation called for by the Council must be understood in more substantial terms, on the basis of a greater awareness of the mystery being celebrated and its relationship to daily life. *The conciliar Constitution Sacrosanctum Concilium *encouraged the faithful to take part in the eucharistic liturgy not “as strangers or silent spectators,” but as participants “in the sacred action, conscious of what they are doing, actively and devoutly” (156). This exhortation has lost none of its force. The Council went on to say that the faithful “should be instructed by God’s word, and nourished at the table of the Lord’s Body. They should give thanks to God. Offering the immaculate Victim, not only through the hands of the priest but also together with him, they should learn to make an offering of themselves. Through Christ, the Mediator, they should be drawn day by day into ever more perfect union with God and each other” (157).

(snip)

*** Personal conditions for an “active participation”***
55. In their consideration of the actuosa participatio of the faithful in the liturgy, the Synod Fathers also discussed the personal conditions required for fruitful participation on the part of individuals. (168) One of these is certainly the spirit of constant conversion which must mark the lives of all the faithful. Active participation in the eucharistic liturgy can hardly be expected if one approaches it superficially, without an examination of his or her life. This inner disposition can be fostered, for example, by recollection and silence for at least a few moments before the beginning of the liturgy, by fasting and, when necessary, by sacramental confession. A heart reconciled to God makes genuine participation possible. The faithful need to be reminded that there can be no* actuosa participatio* in the sacred mysteries without an accompanying effort to participate actively in the life of the Church as a whole, including a missionary commitment to bring Christ’s love into the life of society.
Clearly, full participation in the Eucharist takes place when the faithful approach the altar in person to receive communion (169). Yet true as this is, care must be taken lest they conclude that the mere fact of their being present in church during the liturgy gives them a right or even an obligation to approach the table of the Eucharist. Even in cases where it is not possible to receive sacramental communion, participation at Mass remains necessary, important, meaningful and fruitful. In such circumstances it is beneficial to cultivate a desire for full union with Christ through the practice of spiritual communion, praised by Pope John Paul II (170) and recommended by saints who were masters of the spiritual life (171).
We don’t truly participate through the singing of banal songs. We participate when we are drawn into the mystery. I would suggest, if you are truly interested, to prayerfully read the entire document
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top