Living together

  • Thread starter Thread starter MercyMia
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh, Serap, I’ve read enough of your posts to know you’ve had an astounding life and to be where you are now is quite an accomplishment! 👍 God meets us where we are and if we follow Him He will take us where He wants us to go. You and your husband are a great hope to many of us who are watching the usual teenage garbage and it gives me tremendous personal hope that my own children, even if they veer off the path, will find their way back. If you could do it without the love and prayers of your mother, imagine the children whose mothers are caring and praying for them will find their way more quickly.

I do know of one young woman who went to live with her boyfriend’s family. I suspect abuse was going on in her home. She married him eventually and they have lived a long and happy life together. I recognize that sometimes a man is literally the salvation of someone in a bad situation. I’m not God and I don’t send people to hell for stuff. I just know our society is undermining the basis for family and marriage and articles that equate living together as test drives do nothing to elevate our humanity and dignity.
Thank you. I know this is off topic, but sometimes I pray so hard that I’m crying when I tell God that I really want to be a good mother and wife. I know I’m achieving it all, but my daughter is only 2 and I cry when I watch her play or when she hugs me b/c I have such an ache in my heart to be a good mother. Yes, I have a tear in my eye right now…I’m such a whuss.

I just hope that I can instill faith and esteem in my children, so that they won’t do something like cohabitate and they will achieve high standards of morality.
 
And God is blessing you, Serap. He trusts you and is giving you those babies. You’re doing great! Just put your feet up and enjoy the countdown to your Christmas bundle of joy!

It’s amazing the transformation God can create in people’s hearts! What you went through has made you absolutely determined to be a better mother to your children. And you will be. Your kids will never doubt your love and so hopefully they’ll never go looking for love in all the wrong places. You suffered so they don’t have to.

I tried to be that way for my children. I’m having difficulties with one in particular right now, but I keep trying to be loving. Your story gives me hope that when my own little girl is grown up she will have an understanding of what motherly love is really about and will see me in more charitable terms. I am not trying to be her friend, I’m trying to be her mother.

You are right… hopefully your daughter will never be faced with the life you were and so her choices will be made from a position of strength. Keep praying for her. I gave all my kids’ Guardian Angels their middle names… I do pray to them also to help guard and guide them. Even though they aren’t teeny and adorable anymore. They’re teens and not so adorable. :o
 
And God is blessing you, Serap. He trusts you and is giving you those babies. You’re doing great! Just put your feet up and enjoy the countdown to your Christmas bundle of joy!

It’s amazing the transformation God can create in people’s hearts! What you went through has made you absolutely determined to be a better mother to your children. And you will be. Your kids will never doubt your love and so hopefully they’ll never go looking for love in all the wrong places. You suffered so they don’t have to.

I tried to be that way for my children. I’m having difficulties with one in particular right now, but I keep trying to be loving. Your story gives me hope that when my own little girl is grown up she will have an understanding of what motherly love is really about and will see me in more charitable terms. I am not trying to be her friend, I’m trying to be her mother.

You are right… hopefully your daughter will never be faced with the life you were and so her choices will be made from a position of strength. Keep praying for her. I gave all my kids’ Guardian Angels their middle names… I do pray to them also to help guard and guide them. Even though they aren’t teeny and adorable anymore. They’re teens and not so adorable. :o
You just made me totally cry and thanks for those kind words. Reading it put things into perspective more clearly. It’s beautiful and a good reminder of God’s love.

As for your teenage daughter, they always resent their mothers for about 10 years and then they come around and realize how great their mother is. That’s when they become very close to their mom again. It’s funny how consistent it is that teenage girls all go through this phase. Just be tough and all your hard work will pay off.

The vocation of motherhood is not easy!!! Make sure you keep your hair on your head…don’t pull it all out at once 😛
 
Some Loony In The Paper:
That’s why I’m very skeptical about the recent University of Denver study that suggests that couples who live together before marriage have a way better chance of getting divorced. Really? The study suggests that couples who cohabitate may be entering into marriage for the wrong reasons – like financial convenience, testing out the waters, or because of a “We’re already here, why not?” mentality.
Can this woman not see the obvious? Of course people who live together will be more likely to divorce. You are starting out cohabitating in a little commitment relationship. Marriage must be a full commitment relationship. The two are opposites.
 
I have thought about this since learning of the higher divorce rates among those who cohabited before marrying. (I believe I first heard this in a Psych or Sociology class in college).

My unscientific opinion, is that as a poster upthread mentioned, the act of getting married is kind of “less exciting” if you’ve already been living like husband and wife.

I think many (but not all, Steve!) couples living together think that when they get married, their relationship or feelings will change…but they don’t. All those changes happened when they moved in together, and having a ceremony won’t make things different in terms of day-to-day living. If the author of that article needed to know about laundry issues before marriage, then I feel bad for her. If you love him, who cares about the closet. Is that a basis for divorce? Can you not overlook closet hogging if you have a wonderful, decent, loving spouse?

I don’t feel that I learned anything substantial about my husband when we finally got married and moved into our home, that I didn’t already know after 4 years of dating. THe fact that he always leaves his uncapped shaving cream can on the vanity, or leaves his empty drinking glasses all over the house is not a deal breaker for me!

In my opinion, all that living together does for a relationship is make it easier and “OK” to break up. If you are not ready to get married for whatever reason - I don’t think you’re ready to live together either. For me, it was “in for a penny, in for a pound.” If we had lived together for years and then broke up, I think it would have been as emotionally devastating as a divorce. When I was sure about him, it was sure enough to declare it and commit to him in front of God and the world.

And to live together for fun, when marriage is not the ultimate goal - well, different strokes for different folks. Goldie Hawn and Kurt Russell seem very happy, but that was just not for me!
 
If we had lived together for years and then broke up, I think it would have been as emotionally devastating as a divorce.
That’s a great point. That’s why I don’t understand the need for a “test drive”. It seems like cohabitating serves to intertwine the couple’s lives even more, yet without that concrete committment. I don’t see how that can be helpful. 🤷
 
No, you are not legally required to have sex with someone you are cohabiting with. But I would venture that a healthy young couple in love that could live together for months or years without succumbing to temptation or without that temptation becoming a spiritual problem has another issue going on. If they DON’T want to sleep with each other, what is going on?
There are many people that aren’t overly lust filled that can go years without sex. Relationships don’t have to be like people see in the movies - trying to rip off each other’s clothes every ten minutes.
Given the number of people who come to CAF as married people complaining that NFP restricts them from having sex for a week or two a month, apparently people living with each other are incapable of living chastely. (How’s THAT For a leap of logic? 👍)
So you’re taking the case of married people who want to have sex and extrapolating that to imply that unmarried people must have the same desires. That’s not a leap in logic, that’s false logic.
Someone who is willing to have premarital sex does not believe in self control or the sanctity of sex within a marriage.
You’re talking about two different sins that are only mildly related. There are many people that had premarital sex but would never cheat on a spouse because they don’t believe in adultery. That’s like trying to make the argument that someone who masterbates is probably also a child molester.
And by the way, even for those living chastely, those rare stalwart saintly souls who can manage to play house and not fall into bed at some point… this experiment in sharing a roof means little because it is a relationship without the graces of the sacrament.
This isn’t about you judging another person’s situation or the value of their relationships - it’s about finding a sin in cohabitation, which by itself, is not a sin. Playing a game of solitaire doesn’t give any graces of a sacrament, but that doesn’t mean there’s anything wrong with it.

And it’s not about “playing house”. There are many reasons people live together: a foreign citizen moves in with his US citizen girlfriend and they’re civilly married to obtain a visa before their canonical marriage, a woman falls into extreme financial hardship and has no where else to live but with her fiance, a man is extremely ill and needs his fiancee to move in and help out with things for a few months, etc.
 
However, you will never get me to say that mocking the sanctity of marriage is okay.
Who is mocking marriage? Who is “playing married”?

It comes down to this: it may not be the ideal situation in many cases (and in some cases it might be), but there is nothing inherently a sin. You can advise a couple all you want about what you think, in your extremely myopic opinion, is the best thing for their relationship and their future life, but what they’re doing is not a sin and it’s irresponsible and negligent of you to do that.
 
I really don’t know whether it does or it doesn’t - it’s completely beside the point. We are not to live in a "marriage-like’ relationship with someone who is not our spouse. Not because “something bad” will happen if we do, but because the bad thing that happens is that you are living with someone who is not your spouse, behaving as if you were spouses to one another.
You’re making an assumption about what a cohabitating couple would do, then you’re evidently projecting that onto every cohabitating. Simple cohabitation is not a “marriage-like” relationship. Two people with the same front door does not make a marriage. If it did, I’d have been married to about 10 different people (some same sex!) before marriage.
 

  1. *]Your posting distresses me a bit though. Your main concern seems to be whether or not you can have a Catholic wedding, instead of whether or not you ought to be living with a man you are not married to. I think you should be more concerned about that. Otherwise I don’t understand why it’s important for you to get married in a church that you don’t agree with by your very actions. I apologize for my bluntness, and wish I had time to sugar-coat that better, but I’m about to leave work and want to send this posting off.

  1. *]Please consider that point in all sincerity.
    You are doing an extreme disservice to others by posting this. Just because she is cohabitating doesn’t mean that she disagrees with fundamental Church teaching, of course unless you can show me where cohabitation is in Tradition or in the Bible.

    What are you are doing is projecting your personal beliefs about morality and attempting to ground that in religion, then using that to chastise an individual. This is, frankly, very dangerous to the point of being scandal, as your comments will confuse others and push them away from the Truth.
 
Living together is itself giving scandal. Given the culture we live in now, nearly everybody assumes that a couple living together is having sex, because that’s how practically everybody does it.

What is worth more? The convenience or whatever it is that would make one want to live with a significant other, or understanding that the choice to do so may be a huge stumbling block to most onlookers?

I was pretty earthy-crunchy in college, and didn’t shave my legs for a couple years. Then one day a very sweet girl in the dorm came up to me and told me how glad she was to see that a good Christian could also be a lesbian. You can bet I shaved that very afternoon! Because I was sending a message that I most certainly did not want to send.

Did I have the right to have unshaven legs? You bet. Hair removal is a pain in the neck. But I was more than willing to give that up to make sure I wasn’t giving scandal. I doubt as many people assume that unshaved legs=lesbian as assume cohabitation=fornication, but I wasn’t about to take the chance.
 
You are doing an extreme disservice to others by posting this. I disagree.

Just because she is cohabitating doesn’t mean that she disagrees with fundamental Church teaching, of course unless you can show me where cohabitation is in Tradition or in the Bible. Her actions are not in agreement with the Church’s teaching that cohabitation is immoral and scandalous. I made no comment about what she thinks regarding any of the rest of the Church’s teachings.

What are you are doing is projecting your personal beliefs about morality and attempting to ground that in religion, My personal beliefs about morality are a exact reflection of the Church’s teaching–I have no others. You are clearly out of touch if you think that the Church doesn’t teach that cohabitation is sinful. The only PERSONAL beliefs I may push on other people are things like, “kittens are cuter than puppies”, and “football is the greatest sport ever!” 👍

then using that to chastise an individual. That’s your spin on it. My intention was to provoke thought on a important point.

This is, frankly, very dangerous to the point of being scandal, I am correct regarding the Church’s teaching; you are not. You are the one causing scandal, misleading people to think that the Church doesn’t regard cohabitation as sinful. Educate yourself.

as your comments will confuse others and push them away from the Truth. You are the one causing confusion. I’m in line with Church teaching.
You seem very defensive toward me and other posters. It makes me wonder if this stems from a personal experience with cohabitation and your effort to justify it.
 
What is worth more? The convenience or whatever it is that would make one want to live with a significant other, or understanding that the choice to do so may be a huge stumbling block to most onlookers?
👍
 
I think a good question to ask oneself if they are considering cohabiting with a significant other is, is this something that will glorify God? Am I doing this for the glory of God or is it purely my own desire that I am satisfying?

Seems like it would be difficult to justify at that point…
 
FastLearner:
You are doing an extreme disservice to others by posting this. Just because she is cohabitating doesn’t mean that she disagrees with fundamental Church teaching, of course unless you can show me where cohabitation is in Tradition or in the Bible.
Um, as a Catholic you should know that it is firmly entrenched in Church teaching that cohabitation between an unmarried man and an unmarried woman is sinful. :eek: Try reading John Paul II’s Love and Responsibility.

As for where it is in the Bible? Um, try the seventh commandment: “Thou shalt not commit adultery” (i.e., fornication, such as premarital sex).

How about St. Paul? 1 Corinthians 7:8-9: “Now to the unmarried and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I am. But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion.”

Note he does *not *say: “But if they cannot control themselves, they should shack up until they’re sure they want to marry.”
 
You’re making an assumption about what a cohabitating couple would do, then you’re evidently projecting that onto every cohabitating. Simple cohabitation is not a “marriage-like” relationship. Two people with the same front door does not make a marriage. If it did, I’d have been married to about 10 different people (some same sex!) before marriage.
If she’s just your room mate, then presumably she has her own bedroom, she buys her own groceries and cooks separately, pays half of the bills, and you just call her your room mate - you don’t behave around her or treat her as if she were your wife - but if she’s your girlfriend, then you need to live separately until the wedding.
 
So you’re taking the case of married people who want to have sex and extrapolating that to imply that unmarried people must have the same desires. That’s not a leap in logic, that’s false logic.
I don’t get it. Are you saying unmarried people will acquire desires that only married people have *after *they get married? It seems to me if you like sex you like sex, and if you don’t you don’t. Being married or unmarried won’t change your desires just like that. Aging might, but that’s beside the point.

You keep arguing that cohabitation itself isn’t a sin. Far be it from me to know anything about the Church teaching, I don’t see how any priest would back you up on your argument. Maybe living together itself isn’t a sin, but anyone who agrees to living together with someone is probably in a serious relationship and has high hopes about getting married. I would think cohabitation can only lead to the couple thinking, “What the heck? We’re going to get married anyway,” and from what I can tell it is agreed that fornication prior to marriage is a sin. Now I agree some of us have enough self-control not to do anything we’re not supposed to do, but I don’t believe half of us can control ourselves as well as we like to think. Besides, if love is involved things always get messy and out of control. If you’re a normal person who’s been in love before I’m sure you know what I’m talking about. 🙂

And yes, I, too, wonder: why are you so defensive about this subject? :confused:
 
I have been trying to bite my lip on this comment, but I must proceed. The reason I am so upset with the tones in this thread is because I have seen it multiple times: a cohabitating couple that’s not incredibly strong in their faith is told that cohabitation is a mortal sin, that they’re “living in sin”, and that they can’t be married in the Church. What happens? They go get married someplace else and put their souls at risk.

That is exactly what is happening here. Someone comes in and mentions that she is cohabitating, and she’s basically told that she’s not Catholic and shouldn’t get married in the Church because, obviously, she doesn’t understand what the Church teaches.

Talk about the work of the Devil…
Living together is itself giving scandal. Given the culture we live in now, nearly everybody assumes that a couple living together is having sex, because that’s how practically everybody does it.
I don’t know how old you are, but these days dating for more than a week gives the assumption that two people are having sex. A couple that cohabitates, has two different bedrooms, shops separately, and has separate property actually sends the opposite signal to anyone who visits their house. But the average parishioner doesn’t see the inside of their house to know their living arrangement? The average parishioner also doesn’t know that they have the same address.
What is worth more? The convenience or whatever it is that would make one want to live with a significant other, or understanding that the choice to do so may be a huge stumbling block to most onlookers?
Again, you don’t know the person’s situation, you’re assuming it’s a “shacking up” situation. Here’s an example: a young woman lives at home with her parents and does not work (she’s planning to be a stay at home mother). She’s engaged and about to be married. Suddenly, both parents are killed, they have debt so the house and cars are repossessed, and the woman is on the street with no money. Her fiance has a house but can’t afford to pay for his house and a separate apartment for her. What a horrible couple they are…

What to hear how it continues? They go to setup their wedding at his parish, and when they tell the secretary they have the same address, she tells them that they can’t be married if they cohabitate since it’s a sin.

Want me to go on? Emotionally distraught, they get married outside of the Church, are prevented from receiving the sacraments, and become so bitter that they lose all of their faith. Then, I spend 15 years trying to convince them that the right thing to do is to convalidate their marriage, only to have them long on here and read this thread.
Her actions are not in agreement with the Church’s teaching that cohabitation is immoral and scandalous.
Please point me to the sin. Scandal is about the best you can do, and that is situation dependent. There are many people in the Church that point to cohabitation being a bad thing, and I agree. There are many people in the Church that advise against it, and I agree. But, there is no specific sin associated with sharing a roof with another person of the opposite sex, even if you intend to marry that person. Someone cohabitating is not inherently anti-Catholic, someone cohabitating is not inherently in sin.
You are the one causing scandal, misleading people to think that the Church doesn’t regard cohabitation as sinful. Educate yourself.
Actually, that is the opposite.
How about St. Paul? 1 Corinthians 7:8-9: “Now to the unmarried and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I am. But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion.”
Two people, two bedrooms, separate property - they are controlling themselves. Two people, one bedroom, common property - they are not controlling themselves. These are two separate instances.

The issue you get into is assuming that everyone who cohabitates falls into the situation where they 1) want to cohabitate, and 2) fornicate. That’s a dangerous assumption to make.
And yes, I, too, wonder: why are you so defensive about this subject?
Beyond being none of your business, the opinions of many posters on here are wrong, and a previous thread (and now this one) on the topic are directly preventing at least one couple I personally know (and have been fighting for) from returning to the Church.
 
That is exactly what is happening here. Someone comes in and mentions that she is cohabitating, and she’s basically told that she’s not Catholic and shouldn’t get married in the Church because, obviously, she doesn’t understand what the Church teaches.
Do you know of couples that were refused Catholic weddings because of cohabitation?

EDIT: Sorry, I just saw the part further in your post where you mention that it as an actual event, not a hypothetical example. That’s pretty unfortunate. What’s the parish secretary doing making pastoral decisions like that, anyway? :confused:
 
I have been trying to bite my lip on this comment, but I must proceed. The reason I am so upset with the tones in this thread is because I have seen it multiple times: a cohabitating couple that’s not incredibly strong in their faith is told that cohabitation is a mortal sin, that they’re “living in sin”, and that they can’t be married in the Church. What happens? They go get married someplace else and put their souls at risk.

That is exactly what is happening here. Someone comes in and mentions that she is cohabitating, and she’s basically told that she’s not Catholic and shouldn’t get married in the Church because, obviously, she doesn’t understand what the Church teaches.

Talk about the work of the Devil…

I don’t know how old you are, but these days dating for more than a week gives the assumption that two people are having sex. A couple that cohabitates, has two different bedrooms, shops separately, and has separate property actually sends the opposite signal to anyone who visits their house. But the average parishioner doesn’t see the inside of their house to know their living arrangement? The average parishioner also doesn’t know that they have the same address.

Again, you don’t know the person’s situation, you’re assuming it’s a “shacking up” situation. Here’s an example: a young woman lives at home with her parents and does not work (she’s planning to be a stay at home mother). She’s engaged and about to be married. Suddenly, both parents are killed, they have debt so the house and cars are repossessed, and the woman is on the street with no money. Her fiance has a house but can’t afford to pay for his house and a separate apartment for her. What a horrible couple they are…

What to hear how it continues? They go to setup their wedding at his parish, and when they tell the secretary they have the same address, she tells them that they can’t be married if they cohabitate since it’s a sin.

Want me to go on? Emotionally distraught, they get married outside of the Church, are prevented from receiving the sacraments, and become so bitter that they lose all of their faith. Then, I spend 15 years trying to convince them that the right thing to do is to convalidate their marriage, only to have them long on here and read this thread.

Please point me to the sin. Scandal is about the best you can do, and that is situation dependent. There are many people in the Church that point to cohabitation being a bad thing, and I agree. There are many people in the Church that advise against it, and I agree. But, there is no specific sin associated with sharing a roof with another person of the opposite sex, even if you intend to marry that person. Someone cohabitating is not inherently anti-Catholic, someone cohabitating is not inherently in sin.

Actually, that is the opposite.

Two people, two bedrooms, separate property - they are controlling themselves. Two people, one bedroom, common property - they are not controlling themselves. These are two separate instances.

The issue you get into is assuming that everyone who cohabitates falls into the situation where they 1) want to cohabitate, and 2) fornicate. That’s a dangerous assumption to make.

Beyond being none of your business, the opinions of many posters on here are wrong, and a previous thread (and now this one) on the topic are directly preventing at least one couple I personally know (and have been fighting for) from returning to the Church.
You are absolutely right. In this case, there is no sin. I feel bad for couple like the one example you gave. I was cohabitating with my now husband and the priest still married us. What a shame.

I think the priest in my case, was happy to marry us to get us out of sinning and back to the faith.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top