N
nodito
Guest
I don’t mean to derail the thread, but the Standard Days Method IS a method of NFP, and rhythm IS a method of NFP (though not a modern one) and rhythm and Standard Days Method are NOT the same.NFP is NOT “the rhythm method” (sometimes referred to as “Standard Days Method”). NFP is monitoring and recording signs of fertility, which vary from woman to woman and cycle to cycle. It can be very effective, if both spouses are on the same page about needing to avoid (or wanting to conceive) and if there aren’t health problems that make reading fertility signs difficult (though frequently these can be resolved).
PLEASE do not continue with this misunderstanding of what natural family planning is. It is a disservice to women’s health (real women’s health, not the euphemism that it frequently means) to do so.
NFP is an umbrella term that encompasses so many different methods (symptothermal, Marquette, Creighton, Billings, Two Day, Standard Days) and these modern methods I listed are all very effective. There are oodles of clinical trials proving SDM’s effectiveness for preventing pregnancy for couples who meet the 26 -32 days cycle requirements. It’s not for everyone, sure, but it’s a good option for some women.
Otherwise, I agree with your post.